1. This article explains how homophobia doesn’t just hurt the LGBT community, but that it also hurts the heterosexuals as well. It explains the different kinds of homophobia that can be experienced and talks about the repercussions of homophobia. Specifically, this article lists ways in which everyone is negatively affected by the four kinds of homophobia. The author illustrates the social construction of homophobia as a social problem that needs to get fixed. He believes that in the end homophobia hurts every single person in society, so we all need to work on stopping it. That we all have an opportunity to work together to overcome this oppression against homophobia. 2. Homophobia works on the following four interrelated levels: Personal, interpersonal, institutional, and cultural. Personal homophobia refers to the view that people perceive them as either an unfortunate person who can’t control their sexual desires because there is …show more content…
This could include not allowing them to join or giving them the same benefits and rights that straight people receive. Lastly, cultural homophobia is when society has behavior codes that enable oppression. This could be done by stereotyping or by making it seem unacceptable to talk about it and encouraging people to deny what is occurring. 3. Homophobia locks all people into rigid gender-based roles that inhibit creativity and self-expression. I feel as if this is a significant limitation because not everybody enjoys doing the same things just because their gender expects it. It limits people on doing what they truly enjoy and are possibly gifted at. People end up doing what is expected of them so that they aren’t labeled as homophobic and don’t get ridiculed because of it. Therefore they aren’t expressing themselves in the manner that they want and end up sacrificing some of their
In this day and age, the LGTBQ+ community is expanding rapidly. Therefore, the community has included the plus sign at the end to represent those who are questioning, pan-gendered, intersexed, transsexual, or two-spirited and the many new ways people are self-identifying. Each generation is becoming more exposed to more information and are capable to choose from openly out members of the LGBTQ+ community as role models. For younger generations, it may become easier to recognize and acknowledge one’s sexual orientation or gender identity than those apart of Generation X and the Baby Boomers. However, even in this more open-minded society, homophobia is still living, breathing, and thriving.
On the other hand, Loffreda notices the problem that is practically neglected by the media and the public, which the LGBT people’s position in the community are rather hard and the problem of hate and intolerance towards minorities are not yet solved. From the university president Phil Dubois, “nothing could match the sorrow and revulsion we feel for this attack on Matt. It is almost as sad, however, to see individuals and groups around the country react to this event by stereotyping an entire community, if not an entire state” (Loffreda, 244). The media is categorizing everyone in Laramie as the same, full of hate and prejudice, not because they are just generalizing the problem, but they want to feel superior and tries to show that they have more progressive mindset compared to the citizens in Laramie.
Hatred against the LGBTQ begins with the environment and people we are surrounded by in our daily lives. Individuals often justify their actions by claiming that they feel “invaded” and “menaced” in the presence of a person who identifies as a homosexual. For instance, in the article “L.G.B.T. People Are Most Likely to Be Targets of Hate Crimes,” by Haeyoun Park explains how a psychology professor, Mr. Herek, states how same sex marriage usually trigger those who strongly oppose this shifting culture. “They may feel that the way they see the world is a threatened, which motivates them to strike out in
In Jonathan Alter’s “Degrees of Discomfort” (published March 12,1990), he determines whether or not homophobia is equivalent to racism. That is one question that can be debated all day long by individuals. Some people believe that homophobia is equal to racism, while others believe that homophobia is worse than racism. Instead of arguing for one of these sides, Alter explores why homophobia was considered less serious than racism. Alter writes about both sides of the argument, while he keeps his thoughts neutral.
Kinsey’s continuum measures sexual orientation based off of experiences, affection, and desires ranging from being exclusively heterosexual to exclusively homosexual. Kinsey’s study allowed for the fluidity of sexual orientation to be measured and exist. I think hate crimes and homophobia stems from negative beliefs towards people regarding other’s preference. Hate crimes are the act of aggression and homophobia is bias against homosexuality. I think institutions along with other social structures impact people’s beliefs and influence these inequalities systemically.
One specific form of intertwined oppression is race-sexuality and how queer racism demonstrates this idea. “These children of Black queer couples are more likely to live in poverty because their parents are more likely than Black heterosexual and White queer couples to be poor” (Kendi, 2019, p. 193). The intersection of these identities leads to multiple forms of oppression at once, which leads to the greater increase of harm and discrimination they are being faced with. These policies that target certain races that are then mutually combined together continue to strengthen each other because it is supporting the idea that certain groups, like Black or queer individuals, are not as worthy or deserving of the same opportunities or respect as other groups, like White individuals. If someone was to only fight the racist ideas in society, there would still be those who are facing homophobia, genderism, etc.
specially women and minorities, are given the same opportunities as men and majorities are given. As political philosopher, Susan Moller Okin writes in her article entitled, “Sexual Orientation,” “Because of many changes during the last twenty-five years, explicit legal discrimination on the grounds of sex is now considerably less extensive than is legal discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation. But there are still many ways in which social, economic, and political structure and expectations, as well as some laws, privilege men over women” (30). There are still many who believe men are tougher than women, or that women are terrible drivers, compare to men. Having to live in a community, filled with stereotypes about each gender
This paper will demonstrate that the official version of law hides homophobia and sexism within institutions that create and enforce laws. In order to understand how the law
People who were prejudice against the homo’s increased their dislike for the homosexuals more after the big breakout. Others were scared of getting AIDs and HIV because of health reasons. For example, people who haves AIDS are more likely to get sick than others. The people around fear them more because they think that they might get the disease by physical contact. In general, the society, they prejudice the homo’s and AIDs people just because of the one character they do not like.
Queer theory challenges students and scholars alike to consider the overarching power structures and institutionalized hierarchies that permeate society, culture, and politics. Careful attention to issues such as biopolitics, Homonationalism, and hate crime/civil rights, remain essential to feminist thought. Queer approaches to such issues provide the tools with which to push back and intervene, however, the practice seems imperfect because there are contradictions within queer approaches to these issues. While touting an image of inclusivity, queer theory becomes ensconced in the biopolitics that it seeks to destabilize by positioning some queer populations as more ideal than others and thus promoting a homonational identity. Queer theorizing
This essay will demonstrate the creation and sustained social expectation of masculine and feminine lesbians as a continuation of heteronormative systems and fear of heterosexual hatred. While taking into
Ambiguous Homoerotic Why does it seem peculiar to the general public for an individual to openly identify themselves as being a homosexual or homoerotic? A post on Urban Dictionary defines the term homoerotism as, “the highly charged sexual tension brought about when two members of the same sex (usually men of whom one or both are generally believed to be heterosexual) behave in a way that displays closeness, sexual chemistry, flirtation and other actions that if were occurring between a man and a woman” (Urban Dictionary). The general public has been conditioned to believe it is standard for an individual to be attracted to the opposite sex and it is sinful to be attracted to an individual who is the same sex due to personal, political or religious beliefs. This has caused an abundant of individuals who are homoerotic be ashamed of their sexuality, or deny their sexuality. Leighton Grist, author of “It’s Only a Piece of Meat” describes the film as, “[The film] comes closest to realizing its impulse to overcome difference concludes that the film "presents a genuine, if limited, challenge to homophobia.”
“Nearly a fifth of the 5,462 so-called single-bias hate crimes reported to the F.B.I. in 2014 were because of the target’s sexual orientation, or, in some cases, their perceived orientation”(Park and Mykhyalyshyn). This statistic concludes that out of 5,462 single bias hate crimes approximately 1,092 of them were due to the targets sexuality. Although this statistic pertains to the year of 2014, its emphasis that harassment and hate crimes directed towards the LGBT community is relevant in present times. Because males of the LGBT community fail to fulfill society's interpretation of the privileged or hegemonic masculinity, they experience difficulty in being accepted by others. This modern identity “crisis” not only affects men of the LGBT
In Bryne Fone’s book Homophobia: A History the word was defined as, “Antipathy to homosexuals and condemnation, loathing, fear, and prescription of homosexual behavior.” Despite the multiple definitions we could locate for this word, they all come back to the root meaning that “Homophobia” is a fear of homosexuals. Homophobia has taken on a whole new meaning in the twenty-first century. Homophobia is not being portrayed as a fear of homosexuals rather as a prejudice towards this specific group of people; It is the uneasiness and aversion to change that has the power to create this so called fear.
WHAT MATTERS MOST IN YOUR LIFE AND WHY While in most people’s life, what matters most in their lives may be riches or their training or maybe someone they love, what matters most in my life is equality. This is due to the reason that I feel overjoyed whenever I see everybody around me is treated evenly and not discriminated against. Hence, when I see inequality in any view of life I feel as though a thirty two inch blade has been pierced straight through my spirit. This is all I have ever wished for and mattered most in my life is equality. But life is not a wish granting factory.