Employment Inecurity Affects Social Alienation

Interest in studying the reason behind people being poor would be to argue against the popular thought that “it is the poor’s fault for being poor”. “Sociology needs to strike out in a new direction…treating social facts as things.

1. Introduction Income inequality has grown significantly during this past decades and this phenomenon continues to increase over the years. This problem is constantly discussed in the daily news all around the world. Several consequences of this increase of inequality between people leads to economic problems such as high unemployment rates, lack of work for young people, fall of demand for certain product. The gap between rich and poor is increasing, the rich are richer and the poor are poorer as a result politicians and economists try to adopt certain policies in order to reduce this gap.

This data collection should allow this study to acquire an acceptable level of trustworthiness, even when taking into considerations some limitations that may occur.   Section 1: Introduction Introduction Unemployment as an economic problem exists in each countries and it is often a measure of the health of the economy. It is known as waste of scarce economic resources and as a result it decreases the future growth potential of the country’s economy (Riley, 2005). It is essential to understand the factors which causes the unemployment and its relation and impacts to other economic issues. For instance, of the causes are considered the extreme unemployment benefits, excessive minimum wage and hiring cost, too high real wages level, the disparity between the unemployed labour and job offers on the market in terms of skills and many others reasons (Bell, 2000).

Inflation is an increase in general price levels and has undesirable impacts on households and firms which means the government is justified to use policies to maintain price

It has existed early in the 20th Century and continues until today. The main difference, however, lies with the reason behind the anti-immigrant sentiment in the 20th Century and the anti-immigrant sentiment in the 21st Century. During the 20th Century, anti-immigrant sentiment was prevalent because of the loss of economic security and the job tenure. The immigrants were more than willing take on jobs despite being offered lower wages.

The three main debates include pooling/ socialization of risk, the presumed conflict between equality and efficiency, and whether the existence of the welfare state stimulates of shows the economy. For efficiency and equality the conflict is what the outcome of the economy will be. The concern is that the market system will damage and crumble if more social programs that give to the poor are created, because it will lead to higher taxes and stricter regulations. Production will be cost effective, therefore producing fewer

Many politicians, business owners, and citizens hold fast to the belief that heightening the salary attached to minimum wage positions will yield negative benefits for our society. This opinion is supported by three vital view-points. The first can be found in the news article, “The Argument Against Raising Minimum Wage.” It expresses how the enlargement of this payment will take a toll on employment. The document reasons that if the amount of money employees earn is expanded, companies will be less likely to hire as many workers (Huppke).

It is particularly these factors that incline individuals to move from one place to another taking considerably less consideration of how life in their home country is. And hence, according to Daugherty H. G. and Kammeyer K. W.1995, migration activities are mostly a result of economic opportunities elsewhere. Ernest Ravenstein has also mentioned that migration leads to further migration, so a variable could possibly be set up for

• Lower Government Acquisitions: Economic growth makes higher assessment incomes and there is less need to use funds on profits. For example, unemployment benefits. Subsequently, it serves to diminish obtaining. Likewise, it assumes a part in decreasing obligation to GDP degrees. DISADVANTAGES Long term financial development puts an awful effect on the inhabitants of any nation.

Compared to those with external attitudes, individuals with medium or internal locus of control are less likely to be low-paid or unemployed. Schnitzlein and Stephani (2013) also find that internal control beliefs have influence on the labor market processes at the low-wage margin and can significantly facilitate escaping from the unfavorable employment status. Semykina and Linz (2010) empirically examine gender inequalities in earnings in Russia, Armenia, and Kazakhstan and investigate whether personality traits contribute to explain the gender pay gap. Employees with internal locus of control are more likely to earn higher earnings, and the pay gap between the most internal and the most external employees reaches to about 70 percent. Locus of control explains gender differences in wages better than education and other conventional human capital

Although there are many ways to look at minimum wage, such as the increase and decreases, and how it will affects today 's economy it has both negative and positive effects. I believe that the minimum wage has an overall negative impact because whenever the minimum wage is increased it only makes more people recede into poverty when it is supposed to do the reverse effect. Minimum wage was originally made for people just starting out or a pay for low-skilled employees. I believe that if people can 't afford the stuff they need because of a minimum wage, then they should work harder to either get a pay raise or move to a higher paying job. This would not only help our economy grow but help people out of debt and poverty.

Also, it might take time for employers of many low-skill workers to learn how to economize on their labor costs. They will over time since the incentives to do so are much larger and that would be bad news for the very low skill workers the higher minimum wage is designed to help. Whenever increasing the minimum wage is discussed, there is always a concern that doing so might hurt job growth or imperil businesses that employ low-wage workers business they have to pay their works more and that could be hard for some business or companies. The effect of increasing the minimum wage on employment is probably the most studied topic in labor economics because the government has to worry about inflation and prices going up and also the consensus of the literature is that moderate increases in the minimum wage have little to no effect on employment.

Unlike the American workers, the immigrants do not bargain over the welfare compensations. Therefore, many organizations are likely to employ immigrants compared to the American employees just to lower the operating expenses to the corporation. Taking into account all these effects of immigration of skilled employees, the rising numbers trained immigrants will eventually pose a threat to the unemployment and a fall in wages in

This could lead other shops and industries to raise their prices as well. This would result in a higher cost of living and eventually lead to another push to raise minimum wage once again. It could be argued that by raising the minimum wage people will have more money to spend and therefore businesst activity will increase. This theory is not valid because the weakening of the workforce would greatly outweigh any benefit obtained by people whose wages were raised by just three dollars. “Some policymakers may believe that companies simply absorb the costs of minimum wage increases through reduced profits, but that 's rarely the case.

Yet some see these low-skilled workers as a contribution so the higher-skilled workers