How Does Jimmy Carter Use The Voice In Foreward To Arctic National Wildlife Refuge

The Alaskan Bush is one of the hardest places to survive without any assistance, supplies, skills, and little food. Jon Krakauer explains in his biography, Into The Wild, how Christopher McCandless ventured into the Alaskan Bush and ultimately perished due to lack of preparation and hubris. McCandless was an intelligent young man who made a few mistakes but overall Krakauer believed that McCandless was not an ignorant adrenalin junkie who had no respect for the land. Krakauer chose to write this biography because he too had the strong desire to discover and explore as he also ventured into the Alaskan Bush when he was a young man, but he survived unlike McCandless. Krakauer’s argument was convincing because he gives credible evidence that McCandless was not foolish like many critics say he was.

It was a cold November 16, 1934 and Everett Ruess was in a sticky situation. He was stuck in a snow igloo hastily made 6 days before his hands were poisoned by a rattlesnake’s bite. The rattlesnake that had bitten him had an owner, Frank Dandis, his greedy childhood friend who moved to Escalante, Utah five years before. Six days ago, they were the best of friends, but now they were bitter enemies stuck in an igloo because of a whirlwind snowstorm.

Usually, when people have to give a speech or write an essay they have to convey a message or convince the audience of a specific idea or argument. In this instance it is very important for the speaker to use the correct techniques so they can connect to the audience and convince them of their point of view. For politicians especially they must be able to have the audience intrigued and convinced of their ideas. In his speech to prevent those who wanted to industrialize and drill oil in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska, President Jimmy Carter can be seen using many of the common argumentative techniques, such as logos, pathos, and ethos, to convince his audience against the industrialization of the Refuge. To build his argument, the reader can see Carter use his personal experiences, historical evidence, and alternative options to support his claim.

Jimmy Carter, a former US president effectively incorporates logos – facts and evidence, pathos – appealing word choice and emotion, and ethos – credibility to build his persuasive argument. Carter strives to contend that the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge should not be developed for industry.

Richard M. Donovan wrote the book “paddling the Wild Neches”. Once the story is fully read, the realization of what a human will do in order to keep an important place that values so much, it is magnificent. Richard was 66 years old during his 200 mile canoeing expedition, he did not think that he was going to make it happen. However, he accomplished what he felt he needed to do so he can open minds about a place that needs their help. He captured what was hidden in the river and wanted to tell his story about it. Richard wrote about every little thing he saw, touched, heard around him while he was on the trip. The Neches River was not just a river to him, it was a home to animals and people that carried history within itself. In the book of “Paddling the Wild Neches” it

seclusion, so called simplicity, the beautiful landscapes, its hard no to believe that alaska could cure all of our issues. the dreamers and the misfits that jon krakauer meantions in the quote from page four in Into the Wild expect alaska to patch up the unsatisfactory holes in their lives. a person being interviewed from Into the Wild, Jim Gallien, explains that people, such as Chris McCandless, have certain expectations for alaska; these expectations include easily living off of the land and claiming "a piece of the good life". all of these people that expect "the frontier" to save us believe that since they will live an imagined simplier life, most of their problems will be cured. the holes they search for something to fill could be caused

“The Frontiersmen” was written by Allan W. Eckert in 1967. It is a narrative historical fiction story. The book is full of excitement and adventure chronicling the relationship between the American frontiersman and the Native Americans. Mr. Eckert did research for seven years, hiking around the United States. He learned to live off the land and find out all that he could about wildlife and survival during difficult circumstances. His years of living off the land paid off with the writing of The Frontiersman; it contains factual information combined with some fictional situations making it exciting and interesting while, at the same time, giving the reader many situations which help to understand a lot about the history of a young United States between the French and Indian War and the War of 1812.

The 39th president of the United States of America Jimmy Carter fears the domination of domestic use of the Artctic Refuge. Carter argues that it is the duty of everyone to preserve the Arctic Refuge rather than dig holes in it to extract oil. The Arctic Refuge is a crucial refuge as it is one of the few left in the Arctic and around the world. In his letter, Carter uses ethos and pathos to persuade his audience to preserve the refuge and keep it sheltered.

President, Jimmy Carter, in his speech, Foreword to Arctic National Wildlife Refuge: Seasons of Life and Land, argues that Arctic National Wildlife Refuge should be kept safe. Carter's purpose is to prevent the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to be developed for industry. He adopts a sympathetic tone in order to get Americans to protect the wildlife.

Most people feel protective towards things they love, and hate the idea of losing those things. In his foreward to Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, President Jimmy Carter presents a case for why he believes the national park ought to be preserved, playing upon that protective feeling. The piece uses a mostly emotional appeal to convince the reader, with some factual backing. The piece is organized in such a way that it carries the reader through Carter’s argument, building within the reader an emotional connection to the Refuge. The piece primarily uses its organization and emotive word choice to persuade the reader, as well as a small amount of factual evidence.

Jimmy Carter demonstrates the use of ethos to build his argument, which is that the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge should not be developed for industry. For example, he quoted "Twenty years later, I signed the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act, monumental legislation that safeguarded more than 100 million acres of national parks, refuges, and forests in Alaska". The author tries to point out in the quote that Jimmy Carter safeguarded national parks, refuges, and forests in Alaska by signing the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act. The author depicts the usage of ethos to give Jimmy Carter credibility since the president signs the

The article “Arctic National Wildlife Refuge: Seasons of Life and Land, A Photographic Journey" by President Jimmy Carter discusses American government involvement in shutting down the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and turning it into land for industrial usage. Writer President Carter argues that the Arctic Refuge should not be developed for industry. Through the use of vivid word choice and imagery, evidence and appeals to emotion, Jimmy Carter is able to build an argument to persuade his American audience that the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge should not be destroyed for its small amount of oil.

Former U.S President Jimmy Carter intends to urge throughout the passage that the United States

The following poems all teach readers the importance and significance of wildlife and the horrible treatment they too often receive from human beings. As everything becomes more modern, we can not help but stray farther away from nature. This increasingly insensitive attitude can have detrimental effects on the environment. Although the elements of poetry used in the following poems vary, Gail White’s “Dead Armadillos,” Walt McDonald’s “Coming Across It,” and Alden Nowlan’s “The Bull Moose,” all share one major conflict; our civilization 's problematic relationship to the wild.

In the poem “Arctic Rhododendrons” by Al Purdy, colours and sounds, and the additional first person narration that the author includes in the conclusion, create an effective and powerful poem. Purdy employs colours and sounds frequently throughout this poem to create unique and striking pictures for the reader to consider. By bringing his own perspective into the poem, he takes a poem that could be read impersonally and turns it into something that the reader connects with. Through the use of created myth, Purdy constructs a passionate poem with his personalization and descriptions that contrast sharply to his poem “Trees at the Arctic Circle”.