How Does Jimmy Carter Use The Voice In Foreward To Arctic National Wildlife Refuge
As a former United States President, Jimmy Carter has a voice that many listen to. In “Foreward to Arctic National Wildlife Refuge: Seasons of Life and Land,” Carter uses that voice to encourage the American people to protect the wilderness. Carter prompts people to preserve the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and help the area to remain undeveloped. Carter maintains that it is imperative to protect this refuge by using personal anecdotes about his own time spent in Alaska, powerful word choice to draw the reader to his side, and employs the word “we” in order to instill a sense of coalition between the readers and Carter. Carter begins to construct his polemic of supporting the refuge by introducing several personal experiences of his own …show more content…
Carter stresses that this is a truly amazing piece of land with many aspects that make it worthwhile to leave it undisturbed. Starting off strong, Carter begins: “The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge stands alone as America’s last truly great wilderness.” Right away, Carter establishes rapport with the audience by describing the refuge as an alluring and unique wilderness. By using such powerful wording, Carter is able to provoke inside the reader a feeling of awe, as if they had experienced the magnificence of the refuge for themselves. Carter then goes on to describe the refuge with phrases such as “a once-in-a-lifetime wildlife spectacle” and “magnificent area as vast as it is wild”. The readers are able to gain a sense of what being at the refuge is actually like, and are more willing to advocate for its protection. Carter then switches gears again by compelling the readers to undergo an emotional response to threats against the refuge. He introduces phrases like “tearing open the heart of our greatest refuge” and “little of that precious wilderness remains” to pull at the reader's heartstrings. The readers are then left with the sense that destroying this refuge would be akin to destroying the heart of their very nation. Carter’s use of heart-rending terms familiarizes readers with the refuge, and gives them a sense of what they should fight
Everett Ruess: A Short Story
1356 Words | 6 PagesIt was a cold November 16, 1934 and Everett Ruess was in a sticky situation. He was stuck in a snow igloo hastily made 6 days before his hands were poisoned by a rattlesnake’s bite. The rattlesnake that had bitten him had an owner, Frank Dandis, his greedy childhood friend who moved to Escalante, Utah five years before. Six days ago, they were the best of friends, but now they were bitter enemies stuck in an igloo because of a whirlwind snowstorm. Frank Dandis was a farmer who had always dreamed of being a roamer, one who explores nature’s natural beauty as a profession.
Richard M. Donovan's Paddling The Wild Neches
1104 Words | 5 PagesRichard M. Donovan wrote the book “paddling the Wild Neches”. Once the story is fully read, the realization of what a human will do in order to keep an important place that values so much, it is magnificent. Richard was 66 years old during his 200 mile canoeing expedition, he did not think that he was going to make it happen. However, he accomplished what he felt he needed to do so he can open minds about a place that needs their help. He captured what was hidden in the river and wanted to tell his story about it.
Summary Of Arctic National Wildlife Refuge By Jimmy Carter
412 Words | 2 PagesIn Jimmy Carter’s foreword to Arctic National Wildlife Refuge: Season of Life and Land, A Photographic Journey, he argues the reason why the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge should not be developed as an industrial site. The former U.S. President signed the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act, which safeguards at least 100 million acres of parks, forests, and refuges in Alaska, as a monumental Legislation. To strengthen his argument, Carter uses evidence that supports his claims along with reasoning to connect the two, and uses pathos to appeal to the audience's’ emotion. Evidence and reasoning are used to support the claims that the Refuge should be kept a reserve.
Summary Of Arctic National Wildlife Refuge By Jimmy Carter
564 Words | 3 PagesIn Jimmy Carter’s foreword to Arctic National Wildlife Refuge: Seasons of Life and Land, he strongly advocates for the preservation of the Artic Refuge. To build upon his argument and persuade his readers, Jimmy Carter by providing specific facts about the wildlife that resides in the Arctic Refuge. In addition, he provides reasoning to support his claim such as, how the people living in that area would be affected. Finally, his selective and persuasive word choice further builds upon his argument and evokes the reader. Jimmy Carter supports his own idea by providing evidence related to his experience.
Rhetorical Analysis: The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge
528 Words | 3 PagesFurthermore, Carter mentions that “there are few places on earth as wild and fierce as the Arctic Refuge” to prove to the audience that the refuge is distinctive, rare, and does not
Analyzing The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge By Jimmy Carter
661 Words | 3 PagesThe article “Arctic National Wildlife Refuge: Seasons of Life and Land, A Photographic Journey" by President Jimmy Carter discusses American government involvement in shutting down the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and turning it into land for industrial usage. Writer President Carter argues that the Arctic Refuge should not be developed for industry. Through the use of vivid word choice and imagery, evidence and appeals to emotion, Jimmy Carter is able to build an argument to persuade his American audience that the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge should not be destroyed for its small amount of oil. At first, President Jimmy Carter uses intense words and imagery to further his argument that the Arctic Refuge should remain as it is. In the
A Rhetorical Analysis Of Arctic National Wildlife Refuge By Jimmy Carter
770 Words | 4 PagesThe piece is organized such a way that it leads the reader to forming an emotional connection with the Refuge, making them value and want to protect it. It begins with the President sharing a personal anecdote,
Who Is Jimmy Carter's Personal Experience In The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge
645 Words | 3 PagesWhen describing his personal experience in the Arctic Refuge, he uses phrases that represent his awe of the area, such as "flooded with life," "once-in-a-lifetime," and "great wilderness," to make the Arctic Refuge area seem sacred, and almost creating a sense of guilt in those considering development in the area, attempting to lead them to abandon their project plans. However, when Carter is discussing the damage that industrialization of the area could do to its wildlife and Native people, he takes on a very concerned tone, describing the Native American conservation efforts as a "struggle to safeguard one of their precious human rights," and stating that the Arctic refuge is a very small piece of "precious wilderness" that still remains after modernization took over the United States and obliterated its
Wildlife In Dead Armadillos, And Aldonald's
87 Words | 1 PagesThe following poems all teach readers the importance and significance of wildlife and the horrible treatment they too often receive from human beings. As everything becomes more modern, we can not help but stray farther away from nature. This increasingly insensitive attitude can have detrimental effects on the environment. Although the elements of poetry used in the following poems vary, Gail White’s “Dead Armadillos,” Walt McDonald’s “Coming Across It,” and Alden Nowlan’s “The Bull Moose,” all share one major conflict; our civilization 's problematic relationship to the wild.
Analysis Of The Trouble With Wilderness By William Cronon
90 Words | 1 PagesIn his 1995 essay “The Trouble with Wilderness,” William Cronon declares that “the time has come to rethink wilderness” (69). From the practice of agriculture to masculine frontier fantasies, Cronon argues that Americans have historically defined wilderness as an “island,” separate from their polluted urban industrial homes (69). He traces the idea of wilderness throughout American history, asserting that the idea of untouched, pristine wilderness is a harmful fantasy. By idealizing wilderness from a distance, he argues that people justify the destruction of less sublime landscapes and aggravate environmental conflict.
Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Rhetorical Analysis Essay
668 Words | 3 PagesWith the specific explanation about the influence of the Alaska National Interest Land Conservation Act, that it “specifically created the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, doubled the size of the former range, and restricted development in areas that are clearly incompatible with oil exploration”, Carter supports his argument that protecting the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge is necessary from a professional perspective of the singer of a relative major act by using ethos, and it not only appeals to the audiences by referring his character as the former US president, but also helps the author to raise credibility of his central argument. In conclusion, Jimmy Carter adeptly utilizes pathos, logos, and ethos to strengthen his argument that the industrial development in the Arctic National Wild Refuge should be prohibited in his foreword to Arctic National Wildlife Refuge: Seasons of Life and land, A photographic Journey by Subhankar
Dreamers And The Misfits In Into The Wild
209 Words | 1 Pagesseclusion, so called simplicity, the beautiful landscapes, its hard no to believe that alaska could cure all of our issues. the dreamers and the misfits that jon krakauer meantions in the quote from page four in Into the Wild expect alaska to patch up the unsatisfactory holes in their lives. a person being interviewed from Into the Wild, Jim Gallien, explains that people, such as Chris McCandless, have certain expectations for alaska; these expectations include easily living off of the land and claiming "a piece of the good life". all of these people that expect "the frontier" to save us believe that since they will live an imagined simplier life, most of their problems will be cured. the holes they search for something to fill could be caused
Rhetorical Analysis Of Foreword To Arctic National Wildlife Refuge
438 Words | 2 PagesHe describes the Arctic Refuge by providing an anecdote to when he and his wife visited. On paragraph 2 he says, "We had hoped to see caribou during our trip, but to our amazement, we witnessed the migration of tens of thousands of caribou with their newborn calves". He provides the anecdote in order to give the audience a firsthand experience of what the Arctic Refuge is like. This story from the President allows the audience to understand the beauty of the Arctic Refuge and why it is important to preserve it.
Argumentative Essay On Into The Wild
915 Words | 4 PagesThe Alaskan Bush is one of the hardest places to survive without any assistance, supplies, skills, and little food. Jon Krakauer explains in his biography, Into The Wild, how Christopher McCandless ventured into the Alaskan Bush and ultimately perished due to lack of preparation and hubris. McCandless was an intelligent young man who made a few mistakes but overall Krakauer believed that McCandless was not an ignorant adrenalin junkie who had no respect for the land. Krakauer chose to write this biography because he too had the strong desire to discover and explore as he also ventured into the Alaskan Bush when he was a young man, but he survived unlike McCandless. Krakauer’s argument was convincing because he gives credible evidence that McCandless was not foolish like many critics say he was.
Similarities Between A New Land Of Opportunity And The Last Wilderness
631 Words | 3 PagesThe passages titled, “The Last Wilderness Preserve'' by Kendra Washington and “ A New Land of Opportunity” by Micheal Serillio both accommodate a familiar topic about the continent of Antarctica. However, though both passages contain the same concept, both writers (Kendra Washington and Micheal Serillio) have contrasting opinions on if human action should be permitted in Antarctica. In spite of their disagreement, Micheal Serillio’s passage uses stronger reasoning, various evidence and a preferable explanation as to why Antarctica should be investigated by humans. To begin, Kendra Washington’s passage titled “The Last Wilderness Preserve” claims that “Any human action that would harm Antarctica is a crime against nature and a threat to our
More about How Does Jimmy Carter Use The Voice In Foreward To Arctic National Wildlife Refuge
Everett Ruess: A Short Story
1356 Words | 6 PagesRichard M. Donovan's Paddling The Wild Neches
1104 Words | 5 PagesSummary Of Arctic National Wildlife Refuge By Jimmy Carter
412 Words | 2 PagesSummary Of Arctic National Wildlife Refuge By Jimmy Carter
564 Words | 3 PagesRhetorical Analysis: The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge
528 Words | 3 PagesAnalyzing The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge By Jimmy Carter
661 Words | 3 PagesA Rhetorical Analysis Of Arctic National Wildlife Refuge By Jimmy Carter
770 Words | 4 PagesWho Is Jimmy Carter's Personal Experience In The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge
645 Words | 3 PagesWildlife In Dead Armadillos, And Aldonald's
87 Words | 1 PagesAnalysis Of The Trouble With Wilderness By William Cronon
90 Words | 1 PagesArctic National Wildlife Refuge Rhetorical Analysis Essay
668 Words | 3 PagesDreamers And The Misfits In Into The Wild
209 Words | 1 PagesRhetorical Analysis Of Foreword To Arctic National Wildlife Refuge
438 Words | 2 PagesArgumentative Essay On Into The Wild
915 Words | 4 PagesSimilarities Between A New Land Of Opportunity And The Last Wilderness
631 Words | 3 Pages