How Does Juror Number 8 Trying To Raise Reasonable Doubt In 12 Angry Men
Reasonable doubt can be defined as a doubt based on reason and common sense and not purely on speculation. In the play “12 Angry Men”, a boy is accused of stabbing his father to death with a “rare” knife. Juror #8 is the protagonist in this play and he is trying to raise reasonable doubt in the jury room. He sees all sides of every question and is very persuasive. He takes the vote from 11-1, guilty, to 12-0, not guilty. Juror #8 believes there is room for reasonable doubt and refuses to back down until the jury agrees.
Juror #8 uses persuasion when trying to raise reasonable doubt by acting out what the old man claimed happened and proving that the testimony given by the old man may not have been completely true. He acts out the testimony
…show more content…
The store owner claims that the knife was one-of-a-kind and he had never seen anything like it before. Juror #8 asks the guard to bring in the knife that was presented in court. When the guard brings in the knife, Juror #8 sets it on the table and then proceeds to pull an identical knife out of his pocket that he had bought at a pawn shop. Juror #8’s providing of this knife proves that the knife was not as rare and unique as the store owner made it sound.
Lastly, the testimony given by the woman across the street was brought up and proven to not be 100% accurate. Juror #4 reminds everyone of what the woman said in her testimony, “She said that she went to bed at about eleven 0' clock that night. Her bed was next to the open window and she could look out of the window while lying down and see directly into the window across the street. She tossed and turned for over an hour, unable to fall asleep. Finally, she turned toward the window at about twelve-ten and, as she looked out, she saw the boy stab his father.” Juror #8 uses the visual testimony of the old woman to provide reasonable doubt. He brings up the fact that she had markings on her nose from glasses. Juror #8 asks Juror #2 if he wears his glasses to bed and he replies “Of course not!”. The woman would not have worn her glasses to bed and most likely would not have put her glasses on to turn over in her bed. This proves that
What Does Juror 4 Mean
519 Words | 3 PagesJuror #4 does not attack Juror #11 himself for what he said but instead explains why he believes the defendant is guilty. He brings up facts that are relevant to the situation and his argument to make it more persuasive. While Juror #4 does hypothesize, it is a reasonable assumption due to all of the evidence he has already listed as well as the evidence brought in court. Moreover, Juror #4 describes how the witness “saw the killing through the windows of the passing el train. She says that the lights went out immediately after the killing but that she got a good look at the boy in the act of stabbing his father.
Rhetorical Strategies In To Kill A Mockingbird And 12 Angry Men
526 Words | 3 PagesHe argues that there is reasonable doubt in the case and that the accused might not be guilty. Juror #8's credibility is further strengthened when he produces a similar knife that the accused used to kill the victim and shows that the knife is not as unique as the prosecution claimed it to
Reasonable Doubt In Twelve Angry Men, By Reginald Rose
323 Words | 2 PagesThe eighth juror says “Why show it to friends that could identify it. ”(Rose 31). If somebody was going to commit murder why would they buy the knife the night of the murder, unless to show they just snapped. They would buy it before they committed the crime. This does not, however, answer the question of why he would showed the weapon to his friends.
Guilty In 12 Angry Men, By Reginald Rose
661 Words | 3 PagesReginald Rose compares Juror 8’s method of thoroughly going through all the evidence to find any possible doubt and Juror 3’s method of stating the evidence that was given and attempt to reassure
Jury Opinion Shift In Twelve Angry Men
1440 Words | 6 PagesWhen discussing whether the crippled old man could walk from the house to the door in 15 seconds, Juror 3 initially insisted that the old man's testimony must be accurate, but then said in the heat of the moment that the old man's words were not necessarily accurate. At this point, everyone realized that there were doubts about the crippled old man's words, as well as the inconsistencies in the views expressed by Juror 3, who was a bit too radical. After Juror 8 demonstrated the scene of the limping old man walking from the bedroom to the front door, he had a confrontation with Juror 3. Juror 3's impulsive "I'm going to kill you" statement, which had been their evidence of the defendant's guilt, was again overturned when the other jurors fell silent and looked at Juror 3. It was also here that the jurors began to suggest that people should not bring personal feelings to bear on the guilt or innocence of the
Analytical Essay On 12 Angry Men
744 Words | 3 PagesJuror 8 took it into his own hands to prove the prosecution wrong and purchase the same knife at a
Juror Eight Argumentative Essay
372 Words | 2 PagesThere were twelve Jurors, but one of them, Juror eight changed everybody’s opinion about the murder. There were many arguments presented by Juror eight that convinced the other Jurors that proved that the teenager who was accused of murdering his father was not guilty. Juror number eight verified that the old man who swore he had saw the murder in only 15 seconds did not. The Jurors recreated the old man seeing the murder and timed it. 39 seconds.
Ethos Pathos In 12 Angry Men
997 Words | 4 PagesJuror #2 finds it “interesting that he’d find a knife exactly like the one the boy bought”(24). Afterwards, the 8th Juror suggests that the old man, one of the witnesses, lied because of the point Juror #3 tried to make. Juror #3 says, that the old man “[ran ] to his door and [saw ] the kid tearing down the stairs fifteen seconds after the killing”(42). Juror #8 then suggests that the old man could not have done that because of his stroke.
Examples Of Prejudice In 12 Angry Men
915 Words | 4 PagesThroughout the whole play, Juror Ten remains stubborn in his decision that the defendant is guilty. Yet, at the end the finally sees that there is reasonable doubt (62). Interestingly enough, on the previous page Juror Ten is called out by Juror Four (60). The foreman also has some prejudice at the beginning of the case. He brings up another case that is similar to the one they are doing.
Evidence In 12 Angry Men
488 Words | 2 PagesOne piece of evidence that proves the boy’s innocence is the uncommon kind of knife. The testimony said that it was one of a kind knife, while juror number eight brought the exact same one in a local pawn shop proving that the knife wasn’t that rare. In addition to the not uncommon knife, we also have
12 Angry Men Rhetorical Analysis
1186 Words | 5 PagesMany of the jurors use logos, logic and reasoning, to lay out the evidence in a rational and concrete manner to convince him. An example is when 4th Juror lays out all of the evidence of the knife to convince 8th Juror with seven, linear, factual points. The reader and audience is meant to connect a sense of ethos, reliability or competence, to 8th Juror, as he is the only one who doesn’t, at first, seem to be clouded by ignorance, racism, disinterest, or any other characteristic that might cloud
Analysis Of Stereotypes In 12 Angry Men
747 Words | 3 PagesHe fills in an X and hands the pencil to NO. 12.” (12 Angry Men). He thinks the only pieces of evidence are the witnesses because they said they saw the killing even though there was flaws within their testimony. After further investigation, he agrees the boy is not guilty. Then, juror number three persuades number twelve
Reasonable Doubt In Twelve Angry Men
1011 Words | 5 PagesReasonable doubt proves that critical thinking is important when someone’s life is in someone else’s hands. “Twelve Angry Men” by Reginald Rose, is a play about twelve jury members who must deliberate and decide the fate of a man who is accused of murdering his father. These twelve men must unanimously agree on whether the defendant is guilty or not guilty without reasonable doubt. Just like the jurors, the readers of this play have not witnessed the crime that took place before the trial started. Everyone, but the writer, is in the dark about who committed the crime.
12 Angry Men Murder Scene Analysis
851 Words | 4 PagesJuror eight held his ground and convince the men to look over all of the evidence. Juror eight brought out the files, acted out different situations and the murder scene. The men went back and forth for hours fighting about whether or not the boy was guilt of killing his father Slowly one by one the jurors changed their mind from guilty to not guilty. All but juror three changed their mind, he was the last one standing so the vote was 11-1.
12 Angry Men Case Study
858 Words | 4 PagesThe boy should deserve a careful discussion from jurors before face the result of the trial and he emphases that there were only two people who saw the whole process of the murder stabbing the boy’s dad Juror 8 questioned the weapon which claim to kill father, which is a normal switchblade that even juror 8 owns one himself Juror 8 told other jurors to revote, and if this time 11 jurors still think that the boy is guilty, then he will go with them and say that the boy is guilty too One person voted “Not Guilty” at the second
More about How Does Juror Number 8 Trying To Raise Reasonable Doubt In 12 Angry Men
What Does Juror 4 Mean
519 Words | 3 PagesRhetorical Strategies In To Kill A Mockingbird And 12 Angry Men
526 Words | 3 PagesReasonable Doubt In Twelve Angry Men, By Reginald Rose
323 Words | 2 PagesGuilty In 12 Angry Men, By Reginald Rose
661 Words | 3 PagesJury Opinion Shift In Twelve Angry Men
1440 Words | 6 PagesAnalytical Essay On 12 Angry Men
744 Words | 3 PagesJuror Eight Argumentative Essay
372 Words | 2 PagesEthos Pathos In 12 Angry Men
997 Words | 4 PagesExamples Of Prejudice In 12 Angry Men
915 Words | 4 PagesEvidence In 12 Angry Men
488 Words | 2 Pages12 Angry Men Rhetorical Analysis
1186 Words | 5 PagesAnalysis Of Stereotypes In 12 Angry Men
747 Words | 3 PagesReasonable Doubt In Twelve Angry Men
1011 Words | 5 Pages12 Angry Men Murder Scene Analysis
851 Words | 4 Pages12 Angry Men Case Study
858 Words | 4 Pages