The use of persuasive and rhetorical devices in writing is an ancient and incredibly successful technique. Three of the most famous persuasive devices – logos, ethos, and pathos – were identified in Ancient Greece by Aristotle. Devices have now evolved into techniques seen in everyday advertisements, such as repetition, use of example, and appeal to authority. One of the most successful and iconic works of rhetorical writing is “The Morals of the Prince” by Niccolò Machiavelli, published in 1532. “The Morals of the Prince” is an incredibly effective work that persuades the reader to adopt Machiavelli’s values, while enlightening the reader on how to be a successful leader. Machiavelli masterfully uses rhetorical techniques such as paradox, …show more content…
Only by reading the entire phrase and fully understanding Machiavelli’s reasoning can one really discern his true objective, and the skilled logic that he conveys. Machiavelli often uses historical examples to effectively persuade the reader, such as Caesar, Alexander the Great, and Fabius Maximus. Machiavelli uses Cesare Borgia and the famed destruction of Pistoia to convey that it is often better to be seen as cruel than as merciful, as can be seen in the following quotation:
“People thought Cesare Borgia was cruel, but that cruelty of his reorganized the Romagna, united it, and established it in peace and loyalty. Anyone who views the matter realistically will see that this prince was much more merciful than the people of Florence who, to avoid the reputation of cruelty, allowed Pistoia to be destroyed”
…show more content…
By using antithesis and repetition, he forces the reader to observe each quality and to make their own judgements on whether or not it is a helpful or injurious quality. The purpose of this sentence is to give an example of the qualities that can cause a man to be hated or loved, yet the reader does not know which quality of the pair causes a man to be praised and which to be blamed, which is Machiavelli’s intention. He wants to show that opinions are unpredictable and surprising, and that two men can admire and hate a man based upon one sole quality. This quotation also achieves the same effect as the opening lines of A Tale of Two Cities by Charles Dickens. By contrasting two subjects over and over again, it becomes engrained in the reader’s mind. Machiavelli’s sophisticated use of logos is one of the most effective rhetorical devices that he uses. His cool and persuasive tone allows his thoughts to be expressed clearly and bluntly, forcing the reader to see the logic in his argument. The following quotation is an excellent example of Machiavelli’s use of logos. Machiavelli states that rulers who are incredibly generous run the risk of falling into debt, and that the solution for being a successful ruler is to not tax one’s people enough to make them dislike you, but to not spend
The book is full of speechwriting teachings for public speakers. In particular, it is based on the knowledge of the past such as Aristotle’s logos, pathos, and ethos concepts, and yet tailored for contemporary public speakers with a broad range of references to day-to-day persuasive instances (Heinrichs 231). Besides being highly informative, Jay Heinrichs’ book (Chapters 1 to 10) is also hilarious and dynamic. As earlier mentioned, the book covers the central rhetorical lessons of both Cicero and Aristotle. However, the author further cites fresh examples, centers on workplace, cultural, marketing and political references.
Patrick Henry’s Give me liberty, or give me death! Is a great example of rhetoric used to its full potential. He does 3 major things in the speech that really emboldens the use of his rhetoric. He uses the simple three modes of persuasion. He got his point across without offending or being rude instead he decided to use logic to polite alert everyone to the crisis he was seeing.
In The Prince (1532), Machiavelli lists elements a prince should have. The biggest thing Machiavelli cautions against is breeding hatred. He claims that “[…] a wise prince should establish himself on that which is in his own control and not in that of others; he must endeavor only to avoid hatred” (Machiavelli 82). Hatred will lead to loss of control. If the civilians hate the prince, then they have control over him.
Throughout the chapter, Machiavelli uses authoritative language to help convince the reader and prince that his ideas are worthy of being followed. “A prince must
Then for Machiavelli he talks about how a prince should show no fear instead for him to show that he is the one with power. That a prince's people should fear him. Both authors go on to talk on how their people react based on the prince and princesse act. The authors then go on to explain how they should view and run their people. Both authors also reflect the fact that the way their people are going to act towards them is mainly based off of how they treat them.
Machiavelli argues the perfect prince will be both feared and loved by his people, and if unable to be both he will make himself feared and not hated. Machiavelli believes it is much safer to be feared than to be loved because people are less likely to offend and stand up against strong characters, also people are less concerned in offending a prince who has made himself loved. Accordingly, Machiavelli believes generosity is harmful to your reputation and the choice between being generous or stingy, merciful or cruel, honest or deceitful, should only be important if it aids the prince in political power. All in all, Machiavelli believes the ruler must be a great deceiver and do what is essential to uphold power over the
The words that decided Rome Have you ever killed your best friend because you thought they were too ambitious? The tragedy of Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare takes place before the fall of Rome and tells a story about a group of noble senators that despise a monarchy. During this time a honorable senator named Cassius convinces his friend Brutus to form a conspiracy group to rebel Julius Caesar's absolute monarchy. Soon after they form a conspiracy group and assassinate Caesar they are confronted by the Roman people. Brutus’ and Antony’s speeches to the Roman people and how it influenced the rest of the play and characters.
Machiavelli begins by crafting an analogy, which serves to expound on his sentiment that a ruler must know how to govern both beast and man, and in governing beast a ruler must know when “to choose the fox and the lion” (Machiavelli ch.18). Machiavelli details how it is necessary for a ruler to have traits of both the lion and the fox, as the fox “knows how to recognize traps, and the lion [knows how] to aw the wolves” (Machiavelli ch.18). The analogy compounds on the necessity of a well-rounded ruler and serves to exemplify the core philosophy that Machiavelli is suggesting – that it is necessary for a ruler to know how best to deal with a situation at
Hence, he uses personal pronouns like “you” and “I” as well as phrases like “My reply is.” This makes it seem like The Prince becoming famous was neither Machiavelli’s first priority nor real purpose; he simply wanted to express his knowledge on the western government and gives advice on how to be a strong leader. Also, some of his words sound like he was in grief. For instance, the sentence that says “But as soon as you need help, they turn against you.” It could be that he was disappointed or was betrayed that he decided to put together The Prince.
Niccolo Machiavelli was an Italian Renaissance writer and diplomat. He wrote “The Prince”, and he expresses several characteristics which he believes are important to be a successful leader. Such as, being feared rather than loved, not revealing the entire and/or real reason they’re doing something unless it’s somehow advantageous to them, being duplicitous, and being narcissistic. I disagree with these opinions. First of all, Machiavelli claims it is better to be feared rather than loved.
The Ancient-modern debate involves two main tenets and philosophers Boethius and Niccolo Machiavelli and both have extremely different and even contradictory views of politics and whether morality comes into play and how. Boethius covers the classical side of the debate where he gets some of his ideas from other philosophers in the classical rea like Plato and Socrates. Niccolo Machiavelli covers the modern aspect of the debate. Both speak on similar themes like the conception of happiness, the role of “Lady Fortuna” or Fortune and politics. The ancient or classical view of in the Ancient modern debate of human nature is that humans are naturally good and naturally political.
Machiavelli has clearly started a lot of thought on how the school of Realism operates. Though his view on humans and some of his methods may be extreme, The Prince and the Discourses shows a lot of insight on what do if a prince wants to hold his power and what action should be done to do
However, it is important to separate lying and deception that endangers the wellbeing of the society, from those that benefit society. Upon reading Machiavelli’s The Prince, it is easy, especially in today’s society, to dismiss his arguments as immoral or wicked. However, upon further inspection, much of his theory, such as his justification for lying, is morally correct and highly applicable to politics
Machiavelli has the most correct ideas on both controlling the people as a ruler and on being remembered as a great one. These two viewpoints had great influence during their time and for centuries to come, both with modern ideas and correct ideas even though they had a lot of contrast. Machiavelli’s The Prince may be thought of the more recognizable of the two in the present, but people in the present day have many of the same ideas that
It is hard to tell if Machiavelli is being a satire or evening mocking the Medici family. After all, the Medici family did torture Machiavelli and they already rule in this type of manner. Therefore, the three qualities are perhaps examples to counter attack the Medici family or even the Pope Alexander VI. Machiavelli was a very intelligent man and proud of his educated mind, which he would use it to voice his opinion to win his arguments. He was also instinctive dramatically that enjoyed producing shock and outrage and like great many Tuscans, he feared he would be taken for a dupe therefore, being considered a monster gives them a more flattering appearance.