How Does Mark Antony Use Ethos In Julius Caesar
Plays are an important part of our human culture. One of the best play writers, William Shakespeare wrote a play called “Julius Caesar” which was about the real roman king Julius Caesar. After Julius Caesar died in the play, two important characters, Antony and Brutus went up and made their speeches. Using the 3 writing forms ethos, pathos and logos, I will decide the winner of these two conflicting speeches. This is written by Ramy Alawar, a freshmen high school student that resides in the country of America. Ethos is the rhetorical device to convince someone through trust, or ethics. I believe that both Marcus Brutus and Mark Antony had strong uses of ethos. Brutus starts his speech with a strong use of ethos saying “Romans, countrymen, and lovers! Hear me for my cause, and be silent, that you may hear: believe me for mine honor, and have respect to mine honor, that you may believe” (1). Brutus was saying that all his honor was to be considered …show more content…
I feel like Mark Antony did a lot better than Brutus in using pathos. Pathos is Mark Antony’s most strategically used form of speech. He uses a little bit of pathos in his first speech saying that “He was my friend, faithful and just to me” (4), This says Caesar was a good man, and was unjust to murder. Antony then talks about the stabs in Caesar, he points out the stabs of Casca and Cassius, but doesn’t bring much attention to them. Then he brings attention to Brutus’s stab, Antony says “This was the most unkind cut of them all” (8), He then gets angry, and so do his fellow Romans. He sums his point up by rhetorical irony, saying that the work that the conspirators have done is “honorable”. Brutus’ pathos was not used much, he just used continuous repetition of saying Caesar was a close friend of his, and he was sad to let him go. Due to Antony’s strong use of pathos and Brutus’ mediocre use of pathos, Mark Antony done better than
Pathos In Julius Caesar
663 Words | 3 PagesThe play by shakespeare called julius caesar was about the story of julius caesar. The story of Julius caesar was that he was stabbed to death by the whole senate. At one part in the play two people named Mark Antony and Brutus started to argue and try to persuade the people in some way by using different rhetorical techniques. Brutus used pathos to persuade the people that he chose right and he was still honorable and caesar deserved to die, but brutus mourned for his death just like the people. Antony used a logos and pathos technique to persuade the people that brutus was bad and that julius did nothing wrong, by using examples Antony made a valid point.
How Does Antony Use Ethos In Julius Caesar
1498 Words | 6 PagesBrutus has a hero complex; this is his Achilles heel. The way he justifies his actions makes it sound like he is taking credit for the great deed of murder. Antony uncovers this and uses it to expose Brutus’s hypocrisy. Ethos, logos, and pathos add substantial potency to Antony’s persuasiveness. No matter the motive, the crowd was bound to see the flaws of Brutus’s defense.
Examples Of Pathos During The Seminar
438 Words | 2 PagesDuring the seminar, many different view points and perspectives were expressed. One of the ideas that were discussed was that Antony and Brutus used different rhetoric devices to express their feelings. Antony used many examples of pathos in both his funeral speech and his everyday life. He aims to establish emotional reactions from his intended audiences and sometimes over uses this device. Brutus on the other hand does the exact opposite.
Julius Caesar Rhetorical Devices
592 Words | 3 PagesScene two of act three in The Tragedy of Julius Caesar shows two orators, consisting of Mark Antony and Brutus, giving speeches to a crowd at Caesar’s funeral. Both of them want to convince the audience that their position on the assassination of Julius Caesar is correct. The two both use rhetorical devices to backup their positions. In the end, Antony is victorious. Even though the two speeches have similarities, they also have many differences that made Antony’s speech just that little bit better.
Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis Essay
635 Words | 3 PagesIn the play Julius Caesar, written by William Shakespeare, the emperor of Rome is killed by his best friend, Brutus. At the funeral of the fallen ruler, Brutus gives a big speech to the crowd. He tries to explain why he and the other senators had to kill the emperor, Julius Caesar. In the speech, he informs them that Caesar was too ambitious, and says he chose Rome over his dear friend. Once Brutus was done, Marc Antony gave his speech to persuade the crowd that Julius wasn’t ambitious at all.
Julius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis
1354 Words | 6 PagesIn William Shakespeare's The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Mark Antony uses juxtaposition, irony, anecdotes, and rhetorical questions to appeal to the Plebians with ethos and pathos to convince them that Brutus and the conspirators are traitors. Mark Antony shares a speech with
Julius Caesar Pathos
916 Words | 4 PagesIn William Shakespeare's Julius Caesar, Brutus and Antony both used different techniques in order to capture the audience's attention and approval in their speeches about Caesar's death. They both include repetition, rhetorical strategies, dramatic pauses, and parallelism in order to get the crowd on their sides. Both men use different strategies by knowing the audience and they use this to their advantage. Brutus and Antony both choose the use of Pathos and Ethos specifically appeal to the audience and their love for their country.
Brutus Use Of Ethos In Julius Caesar's Death
706 Words | 3 PagesCaesar killed while running for king. Brutus and Caesar were good friends. However, Brutus persuaded the audience that he did not want Caesar to become king so he had to slew him. They both had some role in Caesar’s death it is just a matter of how much and how they played into it. Antony is the reason why everyone was turning Against Brutus.
Ethos Pathos Logos In Julius Caesar
431 Words | 2 PagesJulius Caesar: Effective Manipulation Using Rhetorical Fallacies People can be very quick to misjudge a situation when they don’t understand the full story. Mark Antony knows this, effectively manipulating the crowd he gathered at Caesar's funeral. In the play, Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, Antony uses Pathos and Logos to create the more effective speech as a means to turn the people against Caesar’s murderers. Antony uses pathos to convince his audience that Brutus isn’t an honorable man.
How Does Brutus Use Ethos In Julius Caesar
736 Words | 3 PagesWhen comparing two brilliant speeches that are presented in the Tragedy of Julius Caesar it is incredibly hard to pick which one I m a fan of. But that is only because of the dramatic irony that foreshadows the play for me. So expecting that you either have read this magnificent play or you haven't, you can decipher for yourself which one you choose to support. Both have their points in common but both have so many differences that it can make it confusing on which one is better. Before Brutus began his speech he said "Cassius go into the other streets and part the numbers.
Rhetorical Devices Used In Brutus And Antony's Speech
721 Words | 3 PagesThis is ethos in the way it gives him credibility as a friend, suggesting that he would truly know Caesar. But, it is also pathos because it makes the crowd sorrowful for him because someone that is close to him has been killed. The use of ethos, logos and pathos made Marc Antony’s argument and speech far superior to Brutus’s. Another reason that makes Marc Antony’s argument more valuable is
Ethos Pathos Logos In Julius Caesar
437 Words | 2 PagesAfter reading excerpts from Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, write an essay that compares Brutus’ speech with Marc Antony’s speech and argues the effectiveness of the rhetorical devices (ethos, pathos, logos) used in each. Be sure to support your position with evidence from the texts. William Shakespeare writes a play about Julius Caesar’s assassination and the speeches his friends gave at his funeral. In the play, Brutus assassinated Caesar because he thought he was protecting Rome. He was saying that if Caesar got all the power he would most likely become vicious and make everyone his slaves.
Ethical Appeal In Julius Caesar
818 Words | 4 PagesIn the play "The Tragedy of Julius Caesar" by Shakespeare, two individuals named Brutus and Antony give a funeral oration to the people of Rome in concern of the justification of Caesars death. Both of them share an opposite view towards the death of Caesar, Antony thinks his death was unjustified, while Brutus believes in the opposite. Despite the fact that Brutus was able to deliver a better ethical appeal. Antony delivers a more persuasive rhetorical speech since he appeals to the crowd more with his emotional and logical appeal Ethical appeal was used by both individuals in their funeral orations, evidently Brutus was able to execute a better ethical appeal than Antony. Brutus wanted to make the people of Rome feel like the death of Caesar was necessary for the sake of Rome.
Compare And Contrast Brutus And Antony Speech
824 Words | 4 PagesJulius Caesar Speech Comparison Essay Brutus and Antony have prepared a speech about Julius Caesar is to convince the citizens of Rome to agree and be by their side. Brutus is the person talking about how it was good for their leader to die. While Antony talks about how it wasn’t good for Julius Caesar to die. It was not a very good idea to kill Caesar, Antony convinced many citizens of Rome. This is why Mark Antony gave a better speech than Brutus.
Compare And Contrast Brutus And Antony's Speech
884 Words | 4 PagesBrutus delivers his speech in a laudatory manner by conveying Caesar’s deeds and claiming he was ambitious, although Antony contradicts Brutus’ claims and says Caesar spurned the crown with the intent to merely rule as a de facto dictator. Brutus’ speech reveals his motives were truly for the benefit of Rome given his nationalistic tone and Antony’s speech was merely used to obscure his true motives, which was to embroil Rome in a series of civil wars to attain power. Brutus and Antony’s speeches consisted predominantly of Pathos and Ethos, but it is Antony who ultimately it is Antony who prevails because of his almost disingenuous attitude and even use of Logos which is seen when claims that reading Caesar’s will would dishonor his compeers and even Caesar
More about How Does Mark Antony Use Ethos In Julius Caesar
Pathos In Julius Caesar
663 Words | 3 PagesHow Does Antony Use Ethos In Julius Caesar
1498 Words | 6 PagesExamples Of Pathos During The Seminar
438 Words | 2 PagesJulius Caesar Rhetorical Devices
592 Words | 3 PagesJulius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis Essay
635 Words | 3 PagesJulius Caesar Rhetorical Analysis
1354 Words | 6 PagesJulius Caesar Pathos
916 Words | 4 PagesBrutus Use Of Ethos In Julius Caesar's Death
706 Words | 3 PagesEthos Pathos Logos In Julius Caesar
431 Words | 2 PagesHow Does Brutus Use Ethos In Julius Caesar
736 Words | 3 PagesRhetorical Devices Used In Brutus And Antony's Speech
721 Words | 3 PagesEthos Pathos Logos In Julius Caesar
437 Words | 2 PagesEthical Appeal In Julius Caesar
818 Words | 4 PagesCompare And Contrast Brutus And Antony Speech
824 Words | 4 PagesCompare And Contrast Brutus And Antony's Speech
884 Words | 4 Pages