Aristotle Vs Darwin

765 Words4 Pages

Throughout centuries of investigation, the understanding of Nature had gone through some revolutionary changes and it accounts for the shaping of modern society. In this paper, the revolutionary changes from Aristotle to Newton, and from the creationists to Darwin will be discussed. Furthermore, the importance of these changes for the shaping of modern society will be introduced. From Aristotle to Newton, the understanding of Nature had changed from philosophic thinking to the mathematics representation. Aristotle understood the Nature simply by observing the real object and thought of a theory to explain the reality people see. The theory proposed by Aristotle were only based on simple observation and philosophic thinking. For example, Aristotle proposed every object have its nature and the motion of the object is related to its nature. Different from Aristotle, …show more content…

Before Darwin, people mostly believed that God was the one who created everything, so people tended to worship God for fortune, and ignore the facts they observed if it was contradictory to the creationists. For example, although Aristotle’s model of astronomy was proved wrong by Galileo’s observation, people still treat Aristotle’s model as the truth because it matches with the thought of creationists. However, in modern society, everything stated should be proved with evidence, and the evidence is not simply the sayings of God. Take LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people) as an example, in the past, people treated LGBT people as devil because it is contradictory to Bible, but in modern society, researchers discovered that LGBT have some relationship with genes, so people tends to treat LGBT people as normal due to the research, but not treating them as devils created by God. This change created a more pluralistic society, which is an important characteristic of modern

Open Document