In order to discuss this topic we must first clearly define the terms “shared knowledge” and “personal knowledge”. Shared knowledge is facts that people agree with such as math or biology. These kinds of topics are usually developed by people that are experts in these subjects such as scientists and as a result those facts are usually accepted by the public. On the other hand personal knowledge is one’s own opinions, beliefs, imaginations, ideas and experiences which are developed by him and that’s the reason why personal knowledge may be subjective to the public. An example could be art since it is developed by someone’s own imagination.
The fundamental difference between personal knowledge and shared knowledge is the want for most people to accept different situations. Personal knowledge is knowledge that is a result of opinion, while shared knowledge is knowledge that is acknowledged and understood by many individuals. The difference between personal knowledge and shared knowledge is usually acknowledged by the contrast between what “I know” and what “we know”. Personal knowledge is essentially what originates from a person’s experiences, ideas and opinions. It is mostly subjective meaning, not everyone would accept one’s personal knowledge as we all have our individual personal knowledge.
From the very first moment we are born, or perhaps even before that, we start gaining knowledge through using different ways of knowing. We learn from the others by absorbing shared knowledge as much as we grow our own understandings and establish personal knowledge. While shared knowledge refers to knowledge which is made of collaboration of many and hence is mostly or totally objective and widely accepted, personal knowledge is unique to each individual and is usually subjective by its nature. These two types of knowledge exist in parallel and they often influence each other. In addition, shared knowledge can experience advance and change over period of time, and personal knowledge may be influenced accordingly.
Going as far back as science and history can take us; we’ve evolved to a highly knowledgeable species. In this process of attaining knowledge, we have discovered many truths about our environment and our self. This truth further corresponds to the knowledge, which we can classify as either ‘personal’ or as ‘shared’. It is however, extremely important to consider the balance between these differences. It is empirical that ‘Knowledge’ varies from knower to knower.
To answer this question, we must first understand the two main terms, personal knowledge and shared knowledge. Personal knowledge can be knowledge that is personal to an individual, through the ways of knowing and examples could be knowledge from memory, habits and emotions. Knowledge can also be the work of a group of people working together either in concert or, more likely, separated by time or geography. This is known as shared knowledge. ("Theory of knowledge guide," n.d.) However, this definition is limited as shared knowledge can also be seen as knowledge shared by a group and not something people come up with together.
They never really seem to take into consideration the nature of ways of knowing that are involved, whether they form a network or not. Knowledge refers to the general information that can be interpreted and stored in the human brain. Knowledge is obtained through different ways of knowing namely emotions, reason, language, etc. The essay is set out to show whether these ways of knowing need to be used together in the process of acquiring knowledge. This question can be answered by arguing areas of knowledge
During my school years, topping my class in all the exams and winning as many competitions as I could seem to be the only things I focused on, rather than the actual knowledge attained. This changed when I moved to my undergraduate studies, where learning from my peers and relating concepts to their practical applications seemed to be the perfect way to increase my knowledge base. At my workplace, the spotlight shifted to understanding the organizational culture, the different perspectives of peers and leaders and then working towards the common goal of the organization. According to the Kolb’s model of learning styles, I find myself to be a mixture of a Converger and an Accommodator. I would prefer to ‘think’ about it, ‘feel’ it if there’s a chance and then make an attempt to ‘do’ it.
Is it true that we can know something through experiences? What does knowledge really mean? Is knowledge truly necessary? In general, knowledge result from the interpreted and understood information from the group of data and may acquire through experience and own interpretation. According to Andre Boundreau, “Things that are held to be true in a given context that drive us to action if there were no impediment”.
While on the other hand, personal knowledge is gained by firsthand experiences especially through emotion, imagination, faith and intuition. This begs the question of where is the line between shared and personal knowledge and furthermore, to what extent are we even capable of purely personal knowledge.
Before we go in depth of this essay I would define personal knowledge and shared knowledge, shared knowledge is something when we refer to things as ‘we know…’ They are the information which are more than facts and accepted by the people cooperatively, subjects like maths and the sciences. Shared knowledge is frequently developed or addressed by the experts who have study about that particular subject for years due which public believes and has faith on them and their knowledge. On the other hand personal knowledge is when we refer to things as ‘I know...’ It is the knowledge that can’t be shared easily. Any knowledge that is made by Ways of Knowing and is not shared is personal knowledge. It is information gained from individuals ideas,