‘Sheila is the character who changes the most over the course of the play’ Discuss
This morality play is written by J.B. Priestley and takes place in the dining room of the Birlings’ house in Brumley, an Industrial City in the North Midlands. The Birlings’ family are celebrating a special occasion. Sheila’s overall mood at this time is carefree. Sheila is engaged to Gerald Croft and she is pleased and excited at the prospect of her marriage. In this scenario Sheila and Gerald are in love with each other. The Birling family is upper middle class. This play is set in 1912 (which was before World War 1) and was performed in 1946 (which was after World War 2). There was a big change in society during this time. J.B. Priestley was a socialist,
…show more content…
She becomes more mature. In Act 3, after the inspector has left the Birlings’ house, Sheila mentions, ‘… The point is, you don’t seem to have learnt anything…’. This quotation indicates that Sheila is a dynamic character who is willing to change. Through her interactions with the inspector she goes on a learning journey. Sheila has matured and she is now more responsible. She clearly understands what she has done and she is willing to learn from her mistakes. This is also indicated in Act 3, ‘…I behaved badly too. I know I did. I’m ashamed of it…’. Sheila’s understanding of her mistakes suggest to the reader that she will change to become a better person and a more caring person who understands other people’s feelings. This would make the reader question the possibility that the inspector is portrayed to spread J.B. Priestley’s socialist message across to Sheila, as from contextual knowledge J.B. Priestley was a socialist. Towards the end of Act 3, Sheila character further develops. She begins to stand up for herself and to stand up to what she believes is right, ‘… I tell you – whoever that inspector was, it was anything but a joke…’. The imperatives ‘I tell you’ suggests that Sheila has now become assertive. She is now showing a greater understanding that people’s actions could lead to very serious consequences. This is highlighted by the tragic death of Eva …show more content…
Eric becomes more assertive as well, similar to Sheila’s character change. In Act 3, Eric responds to his father’s question, ‘…Well, I’m old enough to be married, aren’t I, and I’m not married, and I hate these fat old tarts round the town…’. This reply shows that Eric is trying to strongly indicate to his father that he is a grown man and not a young boy. Eric is clearly struggling with the lack of control he has of his own life. He is assertive and now has more confidence in himself to stand up to his parent’s. Eric is also portrayed as rebellious, as he is not willing to comply with his parent’s
(Cullen 376) When society does not understand content, they turn to others for help. In this situation, it is exactly what Eric wants; more people aware; more attention. He wants the entire world to know what he has accomplished and what they have made him do. Eric blames the world for pushing him to become a murderer and that they should all die with
In his Diversion and therapy sessions, he used manipulation to make it appear that he was growing and maturing. He would admit to some things, such as trying alcohol but disliking it. This gave more credibility to his other lies, such as when he said Zoloft was not doing enough and his doctor switched him to Luvox. This made it appear that he was trying to control his anger issues. Eric understood what empathy looked like, and used this knowledge to get away with his crimes and misbehavior.
This was because of how talented Eric and Dylan were in the art of manipulation. Nobody, not even the boys’ parents could have predicted what they were planning. Both boys appeared to have their futures planned. Eric was working on becoming a member of the Marines in order to please his parents, who were frustrated by his lack of consideration for his own future (Cullen 208). He even lied to a coworker, telling him that he planned to quit his job at Blackjack Pizza when he graduated.
Although Shelia’s action show that she is a jealous and envious person, she completely took responsibility and guilt with what occurred to Eva. she was Apologetic to what she did “No, not really it was my own fault”. She showed remorse even before she knew that she was involved in this incident “Oh – how horrible! “. Moreover, this clearly shows that Sheila accept responsibility for her action feels ashamed for contribution for Eva’s
Eric would hide his true self from everyone. No one knew Eric was a psychopath, not even his parents. Eric created pipe bombs in his bedroom and stored them in his bedroom. The typical parent would come into their teen’s room occasionally to check on them. “Eric and Dylan had planned to be dead shortly after the weekend, but Friday night they had a little work to do: one last shift at Blackjack” ( Cullen 393.)
Sheila in the play goes through a massive change. She starts of as a young childish and naïve young girl. Who conforms with the social expectations of her family. She is down treated by her family and accepts that. She shows her courage in accepting her wrongs and shows how she would honestly like to reform unlike her father who are very Hippocratic.
In The Bass the River and Sheila Mant, W.D. Wetherell uses character development of Sheila and internal conflict of the narrator in order to show that the choices you make to please others are not as good as the choices you make to help yourself. In the beginning, the narrator explains character development to describe Sheila and why she is so desirable. The narrator likes Sheila so much because she is a little bit older than him and that makes it harder to be with her, which drives the narrator more and more. The narrator is describing Sheila, in the beginning of the story to show how interested he is with her.
At the beginning of Act 3, Eric enters the room "miserably," and his request for a drink suggests that he is trying to avoid facing the consequences of his actions. However, as the scene progresses, Eric begins to take responsibility for his behaviour and acknowledges the harm he has caused. For example, when the Inspector suggests that Eva Smith/Daisy Renton was pregnant with Eric's child, Eric admits to being the father and expresses his regret: "My God!... I wasn't in love with her or anything—but I liked her—she was pretty and a good sport—" This quote reveals that Eric has learned to take ownership of his actions, and his use of the phrase "My God!" highlights the gravity of the situation.
Through all the misery Eric went through in this book is unbelievable, he stays courageous to keep his friend Sarah safe and keep her feeling special, at least special to Eric. Eric was filled with courage throughout this whole book by staying calm in scary scenarios, staying fat for Sarah through all the years they have been friends and standing up to Virgil Byrnes while he was a major threat to Eric and Sarah. In
In An Inspector Calls the character Sheila changes and matures significantly throughout the play. Priestly aims to encourage and persuade the 1912 audience to consider the negative power of capitalists and that socialism is a better way forward. Sheila contributes to Priestly’s moral message about socialism and capitalism by emphasising the possibility for change which is up to the younger generation. At the start of the play, Sheila is portrayed as a spoiled daughter who has been taught to be submissive to her parents.
An inspector call can be seen as a moral play as it show the conflict between the characters and clearly highlights to the audience who is right and who is wrong. J.B priestly uses characters to portray his ideas across to the audience and one example is when he purposely presents the change of Shelia from a selfish spoilt little girl to a mature and clear headed woman at the end of the play. Soon after the inspector started interrogating Shelia it soon became apparent to the audience that Sheila to did have a part to play in the death of Eva Smith, a common lower class woman struggling through life. She had forced the manager at Millwards to fire her due to her being jealous about how well the dress fitted her.
In his one sided relationship with Rufus this prejudice only changed operators. Eric came to the city to escape his issues, but quickly found he needed to escape from the city as
At least, I’m trying to tell the truth.” Sheila acts devastated by the death of Eva which according to her is entirely her fault, thing which is proven wrong later in the play; nonetheless her genuine regret and bravery in accepting culpability is admired by the
When confronted by the Inspector about his involvement with Eva Smith, Eric initially tries to evade the truth but eventually confesses, saying, "I did what I did. And mother did what she did. And the rest of you did what you did to her" (Act II). This admission reflects Eric's acknowledgement of his actions and his recognition that each member of the family played a part in Eva Smith's tragedy. Eric's statement underscores the importance of personal accountability and challenges the family's attempts to shift blame onto others.
In Act 1, Priestly presents Mr Birling as idiotic when he says the “there isn’t a chance of war" and that the Titanic is “unsinkable”. Priestly uses his power as the writer to make fun of Mr Birling by using irony as the audience know the war happened and the Titanic sunk. He does this so that when Mr Birling introduces his capitalist views the audience is untrusting. Furthermore, in Act 2, Sheila says that she is “to blame” and she tries to get her mother to “stop before it's too late” this presents Sheila as compassionate and smart because she takes responsibility for her actions and knows more about the inspectors plan then anyone. So, when Sheila displays her socialist attitude, the audience automatically trusts her.