I think that the video, “How Evolution Works, Part 2” presented the case it was trying to make the best. I think that people cannot accept the theory of evolution if they only understand the contents of the Bible in a literal sense. I cannot accept much of the scientific knowledge currently in common use, not just evolution, but also when the earth was created. I think we can make a judgment that evolution and creationism are compatible by recognizing scientific facts and by how flexible the Bible is. Someone can ask if dinosaurs should come to the Bible if God made them. But why should dinosaur creation be in the Bible? The Bible is not an account of creation as an encyclopedia. The important essence is that the foundation of the creation
In 1925, the Tennessee legislature passed the Butler Act which banned the teaching of the evolution of mankind in public schools. John T Scope, a football coach and, mathematics teacher, was accused of teaching evolution as a substitute biology teacher. In this re-trial, I hold a position as a jury. Several witnesses had supportive arguments and evidences. Harry Shelton from the prosecution side and Henry F Osborn from the defense side presented the most convincing evidences respectively as Harry’s evidence presented was very acrimonious and unpleasing to John T Scopes and Henry F Osborn provided valid and scientific information to us and the judge.
What Darrow meant in his statement is using the Bible as an argument of why evolution shouldn’t be thought to the children in Tennessee schools doesn’t make sense because the Bible is about religion not science. The next argument Darrow makes is the law does not specify what can be taught but the law does say that you cannot teach anything that conflicts with the Bible. Darrow argues that not everyone who reads the Bible is going to have the same concept of the Bible. Everybody has their own understanding of the Bible and its meaning. Therefore people will have a different view of what teachings conflicts with the Bible.
Ken Ham proudly supports this theory by many displays of dinosaurs in the museum to remind Christians of this theory in Genesis. Bill Nye makes a a spectacle out of this theory, Again, Bill Nye discusses about dinosaur fossils dated back millions of years ago and to go visit secular
In the video featuring “Night Line’s” Ted Koppel who informs the audience in the episode “Battle Between faith and Science” what is going on in a small town because of a statement about Evolution. This controversy is over the theory of Evolution being the only theory taught in the Dover school. Some of the parents believe that Evolution is wrong and should not be a part of the curriculum taught in schools while others think it should be the only theory taught. Thirty-five percent of the population thinks there is no proof of Evolution while thirty-five percent thinks there is proof. The school board decided to place a sticker on the current science book that says Evolution is only a theory.
Overall, Creationism sounds like a children’s story while Evolution is very detailed, informative, and educational. Creationism confuses students and lures them away from their educational thinking process. In many circumstances, Creationism has refuted scientific theories and has unraveled the lot that science, in most schools has taught us about human derivation. Evolution and Creation are two of the most common theories of human origin, although numerous religious people believe in Creation, the bible’s timeline does not match up
However, evolution is very important and should be taught in Biology classes because students need to understand how Homo sapiens evolve if they don’t believe in the biblical story. Everyone may not be Christian, so it’s important for students to get an idea or perspective of where we may have possibly come from. Whether it’s from the eyes of God or from monkeys it at least gives people a chance to choose what they believe, but as well as understand what they
Dinosaurs Fact, Bible, Faith. They still haven't found a 10ft person, but they've found over 100 ft animals in many places. One being “Dinosaurs” are being researched and showing proof while the other being “Bible” are being researched and you just should take their word for it. We can't predict the future, but with our finite minds we’ve put together things that give us roundabout dates of things such as life expectancy, the term of pregnancy, when a SHUTTLE will land on the MOON, when an earthquake, tornado, tsunami and other great and mysterious things mother nature creates for us that happened based off other facts (things that have happened that has proof). I recognize everyone has learned of a thing called mathematics.
Modern creationism, or young-earth creationism, holds the belief that The Book of Genesis is a literal account of the Bible, rather than a metaphorical narrative (Barbour, p. 386). Unlike progressive creationists, strict creationists take the seven 24-hour days of creation in Genesis 1 as literally seven days (Numbers, p.301). To believe that such is true based off eyewitness accounts written in Genesis completely veers off the path paved by the scientific method for the formulation of a theory, and therefore, can be seen as conflict between the two fields. However, not all topics in science and religion are at odds, such as evolution and creationism. Since scientific theories and religious beliefs are not always in conflict, the conflict model proposed by Barbour is not an accurate description of the relationship of the two fields.
In another example of Brady’s misconception about his study of the bible and evolution, Brady says, “I say that these Bible- haters, these ‘Evil-ution,’ are brewers of poison” (70). Every one has their own faith in what they believe and Brady should not force people to believe in what he believes in. Brady is wrong when he is trying to get people think of evolution is wrong and his knowledge of the bible is right. He argues against the teaching of evolution because in the theory of Darwin about human transformation.
Unilineal Evolution is the theory that societies evolve in a linear progression. At the beginning of the line of progression you have the least progressed societies or “savage” societies. At the mid-point of this line there are the “barbarian” societies and at the end of it is the “civilized” societies. There really are no strengths in Unilineal Evolution. All the information is based on the bias that undeveloped societies are less intelligent which is overall a racist Diffusionism is the theory that societal change happens when societies borrow cultural traits.
It is natural for us as individual to promote creationist. It would be no need for criticism if we knew the facts to be valid. Evolutionary is indeed the cornerstone of all modern biology. Evolutionary on the other hand is as if creationist can be several
The book “Darwin’s Doubt” by Stephen C Meyer attempts to negate the negativity surrounding the theory of intelligent design by giving a creationist’s perspective on the different issues surrounding the controversy and provide an argument for the legitimacy of intelligent design from a scientific and rational viewpoint. The book is broken into three different sections part one titled “The Mystery of Missing Fossils”, part two titled “How to build an animal” and part 3 titled “After Darwin. What?” Part one of the book focuses on the lack of validation and evidence hence the name “The Mystery of Missing Fossils” and gives a very brief introduction to the problems of missing fossils, missing phyla, and just general missing validation of the evolutionary
As pointed out in Creation Moments: DO THE EXISTENCE OF DINOSAURS CONTRADICT BIBLICAL CREATION? : “The existence of dinosaur fossils does not by any means invalidate history as found in the Bible. Vast ages are not necessary for the formation of the earth 's sedimentary rocks and the fossils within them. The Flood of Noah, along with other primeval catastrophes, could have formed the rock layers quite quickly, and a global change of weather following the Flood could have led to the extinction of all reptiles programmed for survival in warmer and wetter
There ae sections of the Bible that discuss items such as dinosaurs, hydrology, physics, anthropology, biology and geology (Science and the Bible, 2003). Increasing scientific knowledge has supported the validity of the Bible. The postmodern worldview that does not acknowledge God as the singular source of creation should not be incorporated into a Christian
Evolution is the thought that the first life forms on this planet were tiny microorganisms. These microorganisms then turned into fish, the fish grew legs and walked on land, the land animals turned into dinosaurs, the dinosaurs turned into mammals, and then humans appeared. Many turn to evolution because they think Christianity is founded on claims and has no hard evidence. This is not true. Through science Christians can debunk the myth of evolution, while pointing