Mohandas Gandhi inspired the world by showing his non violence to the world. “Gandhi’s actions inspired others like Martin Luther King Jr. and Nelson Mandela”(Biography.com). Gandhi once said,”Nonviolence is the first article of my faith. It is also my last faith.” He only believed in nonviolence, never violence. “His belief in simple living gave people a beacon of hope”(Biography.com).
Even Martin Luther King Jr. noted Gandhi as a spark of inspiration to lead him to help change discrimination against African American. Gandhi was a peaceful man who never wanted to fight with violence. Through love and gentleness, he led India to freedom, even though many people disagreed with his ways. Although his mother was ignorant, her devotion to religion never left Gandhi through his life. Which changed Indian history forever.
Even though Mohandas Gandhi was small in size his impact on India’s independence was tremendous. Gandhi had moral courage in fighting for India 's independence. Secondly, when fighting for India 's independence, he used non-violent protesting. Finally, because he used non-violence, his moral courage cost him his life. By examining Gandhi’s fight for India’s independence, non-violent protesting, and how his moral courage costing him his life, it is clear that he was a beautiful and courageous man, who fought for what he believed in.
Thoreau, Gandhi, and Mandela influenced equality in culture, social, and political. They wanted to be respected, fight oppression with passive resistance, and free their country from that oppression. Henry David Thoreau, introduced an idea of man as an individual, rather than a subject. Thoreau was a person that believed in civil disobedience and in justice. According to some investigation I made it indicated that Thoreau-inspired leaders for generations.
Mentioning Gandhi, and stating his thought son the best ways peacefully cause change. This is showing the audience that Chavez realizes that these men have proved their methods the best, and he doesn't want to change them just try to use them for the benefit of the people. “ The boycott, as Gandhi taught, is the most nearly perfect instrument of nonviolent change, allowing masses of people to participate actively in a cause”. This quote really does work so well because of the organization that is used by Chavez to convey Gandhi’s message. If Chavez had not eased this very power quotes into is writing, they would not have been hear the same way.
One of the key leaders of the INC was a man named Gopal Krishna Gokhale, known for his restraint and moderation. This method of retaliation inspired Gandhi to use it but, importantly, manipulate the process to make it look solely Indian. The British authorities ordered a search of Gandhi because they needed to acknowledge the threat he posed to British rule. Gandhi was, however, deemed a harmless, peculiar man who posed no threat. Gandhi then began a Satyagraha campaign which aimed to help poor Indians in Bilar.
Both Gandhi and Thoreau are alike because Gandhi admired Thoreau’s civil disobedience. Both Thoreau and Gandhi wanted peace and equality considering the fact that both men fought for what they believed was right. In their determination for freedom and tranquility, they believed that injustice should be no more. In both “Civil Obedience” and “On Civil Obedience both men interpret that the government
Fighting for what you believe in doesn’t necessarily mean violence. It's possible to resolve conflict without the use of savagery, because it has been proven by many leaders fighting for their cause. Mohandas Gandhi, Martin Luther King Jr., and Nelson Mandela are the epitome of civil rights leaders who achieved rights without violence and have left a tremendous legacy behind for the modern era. Mohandas Gandhi is known for leading India’s Independence movement against British rule. The most significant part
To start this off I would like to talk about our two topics That I will be comparing and contrasting, Hitler and Gandhi. First things is first is to tell you about who they are so I will start with Gandhi. Gandhi was an important man who was inspired by peace when he was to lead India’s movement of independence for the civil right of Indians. He was a man who inspired millions to follow him on his journey and I believe was an amazing, successful leader. He did grow up with an education as Hitler tried but failed, which could have been the reason to the man’s anger during his leading.
But Dr. King 's legacy of nonviolence and standing up for what was right had a huge positive effect on not just America but worldwide. Many know of Dr. King because of his famous speech, “I have A Dream”. Dr. King’s speech brought greater attention to the civil rights movement, it also brought the message of non-violence worldwide, and it made the congress move faster to sign the Civil Rights Act. Life nowadays has made some improvements but, Martin would be pretty disappointed to see what 's going on in the world right know. Somehow Dr. King used his abilities to somewhat unite America.
Douglass makes sure to remind his audience that their “fathers were wise men”, and so their decision to engage in violent resistance was just as well a wise decision (Douglass 111). Perhaps the most compelling argument Douglass makes throughout the entirety of the speech is that The United State’s fathers “were peace men; but they preferred revolution to peaceful submission to bondage. You may well cherish the memory of such men” (Douglass 113). Including this points out how America’s founding fathers are cherished for the change they brought about through the means of violent resistance. If they could be celebrated for such actions, how can the enslaved be so reprimanded for taking part in the same determined fight?