Author wrote questions himself to critic questions (If immigrants' culture affects American productivity, reducing investments, how big it could be immigration have to be to yield that affect? (Eduardo Porter)) those who read this articles including who are gave an opinion about immigrants are brining negative to America’s economic situation. Author’s argument appeals to readers to feel immigrants are nothing to do with America’s negative economic situation. But author’s emotional and personal trust start to leaning on President Trump.
Immigration has been a part of many native-born American pasts. Whether first generation or fifth generation, most people in the United States have ties to immigration. Immigration can provide a multitude of benefits to a country including: more diverse culture, new foods, more workers, and more academic scholars. Immigration can provide families, and individuals, the ability to take their aspirations and make them come true. However, with vast immigration comes great responsibility.
Immigration has become a serious debate within these last couple of years, especially these couple of months. Did you know there are 41 million foreign-born individuals living in the United States right now? Immigrants either come to the U.S two ways: by crossing the border or overstaying their Visa. There are many reasons why someone would want to come to another country; but the three main reasons are for religious freedom, opportunity, or survival. Many would argue that because there are so many immigrants, they take jobs and opportunities from native-born citizens.
I have to leave. My mother was in a car accident. She needs me. Doug understands and plans to drive to the gated community where my mom lives more than an hour away from our rented bungalow in Venice. He doesn’t mind the distance despite the 405 freeway being congested at all hours of the day and night.
Until this day, people still have a misconception about immigrants and don’t realize how immigration can benefit the economy. Native-born americans argue that immigrants don’t contribute deeply to the United States as a nation. Therefore, this paper is going to analyze two articles written by Camarota and Bush to determine what they say about the impact that immigration has on the economy. Some of the arguments that Bush stated is the effects of immigrants in the U.S. labor force and the income for natives. The author Steven Camarota argued that immigrants and natives compete within one another to get a job.
According to the Current Population Survey (2016), immigrants account to 27 percent of the total population of the United States of America, which means that the number of immigrants living in the U.S is approximately 84.3 million people. Based on the data by Migration Policy Institute (2015), the number of immigrants in 1970 was approximately 9.6 million people and by 2010, the number had reached approximately 40 million. The number of immigrants keeps on rising, and is expected to continue to rise in the future. The astonishing amount is bound to have some effects on the host country, in this case the United States, in many things including the economy. Many experts and economists argue whether immigrants bring more benefits or disadvantages for the economy of the country they’re immigrating to.
As seen in the chart below, immigrants are vital in some states. The figure below illustrates how vital immigrants have become to the Californian economy. But just how does immigration benefit America? Immigration provides an “economic edge” (Griswald, par 1). Immigrants bring in fresh innovative ideas to the American workforce.
The essays share the same central focus: immigration. Both authors describe the many benefits of immigration for America. “...we would have to conclude that our history and society would have been vastly different if they (immigrants) had stayed home”(Kennedy pg24). Our country has been monumentally impacted by the creations, choices, and brilliant ideas of immigrants.
This opinion has a number of errors to it. In this regard, it does not take into account the rise in labor demand that occurs due to the immigration (Borjas, 23). The demand for labor is acquired from another area, meaning that it is acquired from the demand for final result. The immigrants offer labor to a wide range of markets. On the other hand, though, the immigrants acquire labor income that is directed to the purchase of products and services produced in the local economy.
Clearly, upon their arrival, immigrants earn less than natives of equal attributes. Earnings assimilation refers to the earnings growth rate of immigrants in later years at destination above and beyond the growth rate experienced by natives of similar measured characteristics. Recent immigrants suffer from language difficulties, lack of social networks, and only partial information on the new labor market. The skills acquired in the source country are often not perfectly transferable to the destination country. The transferability of immigrants’ skills is related to the source country from which they arrive.
In Economic and Social Impact of Immigrants Stephen Moore is arguing that immigrants and refugees contribute positively to the American Economy. He conveys this through the use of surveys, data, and facts from multiple sources. In the second paragraph he took a 1986 survey that concluded that a lot of foreigners achieved success in this country in difficult positions such as engineering and entrepreneurship. Two separate studies’ discussed in the sixth and seventh paragraphs dispel common beliefs that immigrants take jobs away from natural born citizens. The studies concluded that the exact opposite of popular opinion, immigrants in fact benefitted the economy for employers, employees, and the US economic position.
The Earth can be improved All we need to do is work together The world needs to see that immigrants are struggling Immigrants are important to our countries in ways that can’t be explained We need to create more job opportunities for immigrants because they help out a lot There are many arguments about minority rights and freedoms
The main reason for immigration has remained economic opportunity, the appeal of better land or a better job. Before 1920, about 30 percent of all immigrants to the United States later returned to their native country. Some immigrants intend to stay in a new country temporarily and then go back home. But others go back because they find adjusting to a new society too difficult. (Source: The World Book Encyclopedia, Volume 10, Page 82).
However, one must bear in mind those better, services, health and education can only come to those who can pay. For an example in most part of the world such as Brazil, China and South Africa migrants occupy informal settlement or slums where they are completely excluded from the so-called pull factors. The issue of population has been cited as one of the contributing factor in
Discussion Contrary to popular belief, migrants are not diseased people; however, the actual process of migrating, depending on the conditions encountered, makes migrants particularly susceptible to physical, environmental, social and psychological problems.5 In short, the migration process makes migrants and refugees vulnerable. Infectious and communicable diseases may spread in conditions where health hygiene and sanitation are poor. Likewise, the incidence of non-communicable diseases may be distributed inequitably due to the stresses of migration and the lack of access to the necessary medical services both in the countries of origin and the receiving states. Psychosocial illnesses like anxiety and depression from traumatic experiences, for example war, may lead to migrants having problems with substance abuse.
