ipl-logo

How Is Andrew Jackson A Foe To The Cherokee

472 Words2 Pages

Brayden Hawk
Ms. Warhurst
English I
April 6, 2023

Is Andrew Jackson a friend or a foe to the Cherokee

Introduction (Thesis) While some may say that president Andrew Jackson was a friend to the Cherokee Indian tribe, he was actually a natural enemy. I think Andrew Jackson was an enemy because in Doc 1,4, and 5, it states many things that make him an enemy. Andrew Jackson did help the Cherokee Indian tribe, but they lost so many things they can’t reclaim. Andrew Jackson got more than what the Cherokee gained and the Cherokee lost many things while Andrew Jackson lost nothing.
Body 1 In doc 1 Andrew Jackson is trying to convince the United States Congress that moving the native americans will be beneficial to all. Andrew Jackson states that it will make the southwestern frontier stronger, which will help other states to repel invasions without help and it will separate Indian tribes from contact with whites. Andrew Jackson also has said some questabile things about the Cherokee, Has enabled them to pursue happiness in their own rude way or to cast off their savage habits. In the background of this doc it says that it would be beneficial to all but in this doc it only beneficial to the whites. …show more content…

So he sent them a message saying they needed to move or they would have difficulties. In the message he also uses the condition of the Creeks as a threat all so saying their men are committing depredations to the white citizens and they are making blood shed. Andrew Jackson uses many threats to the Cherokee but making it sound like they are

Show More
Related

  • Did Andrew Jackson Deserve To Be On The 20 Dollar Bill

    1107 Words  | 5 Pages

    Even though Jackson was saved by a Cherokee native, he would not return the favor. " Chief John Ross sent Junaluska as an envoy to plead with President Jackson for protection for his people, but Jackson's manner was cold and indifferent towards the rugged son of the forest who had saved his life. " Junaluska was sent to beseeched President Jacksons to not push forward with the Indian Removal Act. Jackson wasn’t very magnanimity with the natives by pushing them off their ancestral land just so the U.S. can

    Read More

  • Georgia Vs Cherokee Case Study

    611 Words  | 3 Pages

    2.2 In Andrew Jackson’s argument, Jackson addresses his opinions about the treaty and Cherokees that let us know the main purpose of this treaty, “[i]t seems now to be an established fact that [Cherokees] can not live in contact with a civilized community and prosper.” And he also explains the new settlements and those people’s lives, “…the Indians are removed at the expense of the United States, and with certain supplies of clothing, arms, ammunition, and other indispensable articles; they are also furnished gratuitously with provisions for the period of a year after their arrival at their new

    Read More

  • Case Study: The Indian Removal Act Of 1830

    738 Words  | 3 Pages

    In President Jackson’s message to Congress, he wrote of wanting to remove the Indian’s from their land for the purpose of increasing the land of the Whites. He wrote this letter as if he was doing the Native’s a favor in paying for them to move and giving them land to live on. It was as if the Indian’s were given the opportunity of a lifetime, and they should take this opportunity for their own good. President Jackson wrote: Can it be cruel in this Government

    Read More

  • What Is Andrew Jackson's Experience With Racism Toward Native Americans?

    1874 Words  | 8 Pages

    The policies made by Jackson during his presidency were indeed motivated by racism, and he used them to ruin the lives of Native Americans, eliminate their culture and uniqueness, as well as to drive them out of their homes. One way Jackson’s

    Read More

  • How Did Andrew Jackson Impact On Society

    693 Words  | 3 Pages

    He would refer to them in inhumane ways and forced them to move from their tribes just so he could benefit from their land. Jackson commented “... and perhaps cause them gradually, under the protection of the government and through the influence of good counsel, to cast off their savage habits and become an interesting, civilized, and Christian community” (Document 5). The Indians are being portrayed as aggressive animals when Jackson refers to their “savage habits.” Jackson not only made negative remarks about the Indians, but he also allowed soldiers to make the removal of Indians brutal, while knowing there was no way the Indians could defend themselves. Soldiers would not allow Indians to gather any belongings when they were picked up, not even another change of clothing.

    Read More

  • Essay On Was The Government Justified In Saving The Cherokee

    649 Words  | 3 Pages

    As president Jackson had many plans for the United States. He founded the Democratic Party and supported the country with his individual liberty. That’s the bright side of what he has done, but on the darker side he has passed a law that would remove the Natives from their land. Gold was also found within Cherokee territory and that gave more reason to the greed thirsty Americans to remove the Natives from their land.

    Read More

  • Andrew Jackson American Indian Analysis

    239 Words  | 1 Pages

    President Andrew Jackson’s views regarding American Indians also challenged the law. Treaties were and continue to be legal agreements among sovereign nations. However, Jackson refused to believe that Native American tribes were sovereign and thus viewed Indian treaties as an absurdity. Ultimately, he forcibly removed a number of tribes, most notoriously the Cherokee, from their homes.

    Read More

  • Andrew Jackson's Speech On Indian Removal

    423 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the Andrew Jackson speech to congress on indian removal, It talks about the reasons why they should be removed. Andrew Jackson's main reason why they should be removed is because of westward expansion and how it's the whites turn to develop the land. He also says how it will benefit both people even though it would actually make the Indians life worse. I thought it was interesting how they thought the Indians were the problem on westward expansion. In their eyes they thought whites and Indians couldn't mix.

    Read More

  • How Did Andrew Jackson Stand For The Common Man

    1302 Words  | 6 Pages

    Andrew Jackson supposedly stood for the rights of men, however he treated men like nothing more than a vermin and livestock. The Trail of Tears is “ one of death and dying--for old men, young women, small children, and expectant mothers, all under the bayonets of white troops. The Cherokee were hunted down, herded into stockades, organized in wagon trains, and sent forth under military guard”(Gottesman). They were treated as outsiders, something to get rid of. However, the people were there a lot longer than any of the people taking their own land.

    Read More

  • Westward Expansion Dbq

    893 Words  | 4 Pages

    According to “The Trail of Tears,” American History Illustrated, 97% of Georgians voted for Jackson for president because he supported their expansion into Indigenous lands to the northwest (Document A). This made westward expansion a major policy goal of the Jackson campaign, which was possible only by relocating Indigenous peoples. So what? Moreover, in President Andrew Jackson’s message to Congress on Indian removal on December 6, 1830, Jackson presented the removal of Indigenous “savages” as a positive idea for the growth of the nation (Document E). He presented the building of cities, farms, and industries as natural progress, which the Indigenous peoples were blocking.

    Read More

  • Andrew Jackson's Economic Policy

    1064 Words  | 5 Pages

    P.2a Cherokee Policy Paper Andrew Jackson was one of the most controversial presidents due to his affiliation with the Trail of Tears and the devastating aftermath that emerged. Nations, like President Jackson and the US, establish their decisions with the basis of social, economic, and political policies. Consequently, Jackson’s contribution to the removal of the Cherokee Indians, an act that has been compared to ethnic cleansing, impacted these three principles. The Jackson Administration’s proposal to remove the Cherokee Tribe west of the Mississippi River resulted in a continuation of the previous social and economic policies, but changed the political policies conducted by the US towards the tribes.

    Read More

  • What Are The Pros And Cons Of Eminent Domain

    1566 Words  | 7 Pages

    Andrew Jackson, the 7th President of the US government shared his strong beliefs behind his initiative called the “Indian Removal Act'' that forced Native American tribes to relocate to Oklahoma territories. The policies in which native american’s were forced away to Oklahoma territories was known as the Trail Of Tears, and it was an awful process filled with death and despair for the native population and their culture. Andrew Jackson stressed that his policies, “will separate the Indians from immediate contact with settlements of whites” and therefore allow for both parties to prosper (Jackson, 371). Similarly to eminent domain, Jackson’s intention could be beneficial to everybody, unfortunately however the Native Americans would later nearly completely perish due to the disease and wars with colonists. However, the land taken from the Native Americans was later built on and used to benefit American citizens at the expense of Native Americans who lived there.

    Read More

  • Andrew Jackson: Not Guilty Of Crimes Against Humanity

    1737 Words  | 7 Pages

    He believed Jackson needed a reality check. The Indians were there first, it was their land. He force the Natives to move away from their homeland, with brute force. He believes Jackson could not justify his actions just because it was for America’s benefit. He also stated Jackson refused to listen to many people, and he refused to let Indians live.

    Read More

  • Andrew Jackson: A Hero Or Villain?

    865 Words  | 4 Pages

    Andrew Jackson’s sentiment towards the Native Americans was certainly not a kind one. Manifest destiny was a popular belief among Americans, including Jackson, and he would go to the extent of forcing Native Americans out of their homes to reach their “ordained goal”. He believed in the expansion of southern slavery which is why he pushed for removing the Indians west of the Mississippi, which makes it the more disgraceful. The Indian Removal Act of 1830 said that it will allow American government to offer in-state territories to the Indian’s for their western land. This wasn’t the case when the U.S. went in and drove the Indians out by force.

    Read More

  • Andrew Jackson Good Or Bad

    516 Words  | 3 Pages

    Although Jackson was important, he was part of many terrible things. Around the 1820s there were many major indian tribes in eastern United States such as Cherokee, Chickasaw, Creek and Seminole. This soon came to a change. Andrew Jackson thought these Indians were in the way of eastern development, using the Indian Removal Act which the congress had approved he decided to kick them out and send them west. In 1831 the Supreme Court ruled that the Cherokee Indians had the right to self government and the United States could not interfere with that.

    Read More

More about How Is Andrew Jackson A Foe To The Cherokee

Open Document