Guyer High School Archetypal Literary Criticism of Batman: Nightwalker Gavin Godfrey English 4 Coach K March 8, 2023 When reading through a novel, readers can find deeper meanings from the text, then what is written. Literary theory can be used to lead readers into understanding the texts' different meanings. In Marie Lu’s Batman: Nightwalker, the reader is shown coming of age through the struggles with loss, sense of purpose, and vulnerability during his maturing process. The hero archetype pairs well with the antagonist's temptress character archetypes as well as the tower symbolic archetype help illustrate the novel's theme of coming of age.
Anaya utilizes Tenorio as a recurring motif embodying the theme of evil and revenge. Although Tenorio has good reason to despise Ultima, he casts a blanket of hate over many other characters. Throughout the novel, Antonio views Tenorio as the true essence of evil, while he views Ultima as the essence of good. Anaya provides the reader with reasonable proof of Tenorio´s despicable nature. Praying on the dormant fears of normal people, he manages to turn them against Ultima under false accusations.
In the novel Bless Me, Ultima, written by Rudolfo Anaya, follows the journey of the main character, Antonio, from his childhood into his early maturity. His journey slowly stripped away at his innocence and continually challenged his religious beliefs shaping him into the person that is seen at the end of the book. Growing up can be a challenge and through this book, it shows how Antonio grew up from a six year old boy into a man through the help of his family, his religious belief, the challenges caused by different people, and especially Ultima, a healer. One example of Antonio growing up into a mature person was when he witnessed the death of Lupito. After seeing Lupito get shot and die right in front of him, he started questioning
In the hero 's journey, this comes in the form of a rival. A rival can start out in the form of a helper but slowly develop into an antagonist that may lead the hero to never fulfill their hero status. This character is often unpredictable, and may not understand themselves, causing them to project their anger on
You've got Batman, Superman and these Saints.” This relates back to the traits of an antihero raising the doubts of morality. When society cannot decipher whether they are good or evil, that is when you have an antihero. The use of these interviews at the end of the film really puts what a hero and an antihero is into perspective. Some would say that they are evil due to their use of lethal force upon their victims.
Context Heroes. Although heroes were not seen as gods they did enjoy the privilege of being divine or at lease semi-divine (LoCicero, 2008:3). Heroes are often admired due to their
Batman is one of the most iconic superheroes in the world of fiction, and his story has inspired countless interpretations across various media. In the novel Batman: Nightwalker by Marie Lu, we see the Caped Crusader in his early years as a crime-fighter. Through his encounters with a dangerous criminal known as the Nightwalker, we see various hero archetypes that show a sense of purpose in Batman's actions. Firstly, Batman exhibits the archetype of the "reluctant hero.
Mahdi Jaber Mrs. Schwartz British Literature Dec 5 2015 Heroes “Heroes represent the best of ourselves, respecting that we are human beings. A hero can be anyone from Gandhi to your classroom teacher, anyone who can show courage when faced with a problem. A hero is someone who is willing to help others in his or her best capacity (Martin).” Respectively, anyone can be a hero but heroes are classified as people with aspects including Faith, loyalty, modesty, courtesy, honor, and bravery. Merriam-Webster’s Dictionary defines a hero as “a person who is admired for great or brave acts of fine qualities.”
Heroes in books and movies alike are celebrated for saving frail women from demonic fiends, saving planets from alien invasion, and are often seen as role models and figureheads who serve as society’s source of admiration. However, not all heroes exhibit these stereotypical traits; an example of this break from the trend includes the anti-hero, or a hero who is conspicuously lacking in heroic qualities. And although most people expect such a character to be cowardly or even unheroic altogether, contrary to popular belief, the anti-hero possesses a fundamental role in the progression of a story. In the novel Grendel by John Gardner, Gardner relates his own separation from society to the character of Grendel by establishing him as the antihero
Preamble: In all pieces of literature, there are many different types of characters, in which there are variations between these types. Characters like the hero, villain, anti-hero, and victim play an integral role in the expression of the author’s ideas within the novel. The hero, however, is deemed to be the character who is the protector and enforcer of what is good and just. Despite this, a hero is not immaculate, as his/her decisions can reveal certain flaws.
An anti or un hero is a character that has good intentions but uses bad reasoning, makes bad choices, or is not honest about how they got to be where they are. They are someone like Jay Gatsby. Jay Gatsby threw parties, bought an expensive house, let anyone come over all for one person, Daisy. Anything he every did was for her. He wanted her to love him again.
Society wants to understand its heroes and their motivations; the ones who are more “human” tend to be more popular and possibly even beloved. Making a mistake out of love is understandable to most people but making a decision to cause terror and compliance is not very relatable. The ability to see ourselves, our flaws, our weakness, and our strengths in our heroes makes them more likable and understood, even when
Napoleon is viewed in many different ways between different people. Many ask themselves if he was a villain or a hero, was he beneficial for the people, and did he cause the downfall of France. When you ask yourself these questions, you will come up with your own answer but many others will disagree with you. Napoleon is a true villain and despite the fact that he was a good leader for the military because he caused more negative than positive things to happen to France. The first problem he caused was becoming a dictator, the second was making many surrounding countries turn against him and lastly, he didn’t care about his people like a leader should.
This shows how she isn’t willing to conform and be so respectful of what people think. Hero however is very conforming so it shows the difference in just how they go about certain
It is wrong to highlight only parts of a person’s life. A person may have done many great things that people know, yet could have done bad things people do not know. If you only know parts of a person you do not know who they truly. It is common to discuss heroes about their flaws and strengths side-by-side, but that should not be the main point of discussion. A hero 's past have many secretes in which it can change a person 's viewpoint on a hero or on villains as well.
