John Krakauer wrote the book Into the Wild about Christopher McCandless, who takes a wild journey. This book tells of his crazy adventures of him being in the wild. This book contains personal information on what might have led McCandless to go on his own and live the lifestyle that he lived. Chris is a figure both admired and criticized in the years following his death. Some believe McCandless to be a noble, determined, brave, and extraordinary adventurer worthy of admiration for living his life to the fullest. Others believe McCandless to be arrogant, selfish, disrespectful, silly, and ignorant. Author Jon Krakauer states, “Nothing is more damaging to the adventurous spirit within a man than a secure future. The very basic core of a man’s …show more content…
To be determined means to be firmly set in one's decisions and not break just because things get tough. Many people were put in McCandless’s way that tried to knock him off the path that he wanted to take because they knew that it was not the safest thing for him. He had met someone named Jim Gallien along his travels that had warned him “the hunting wasn’t easy where he was going, that he could go days without killing any game” (Krakauer 5). McCandless was so stubborn and he would pretty much turn anyone down on any advice they tried to give him. McCandless was a very independent person and didn’t want to rely on anyone to do something for him. “I won’t run into anything I can’t deal with on my own”(Krakauer 6). Chris also “hadn’t spoken to his family in nearly two years”(Krakauer 6). He wanted no one to interfere with him finding himself and those examples show just how determined he was to do so. One of Chris’s biggest goals for himself was to make a life of his own and not end up like his parents. Being determined like in those specific examples, is what led him to be his own person and not just another variant of his parents. There was nothing that would make McCandless doubt that he could make it in Alaska on his
McCandless made a lot of mistakes in his journey because of his stubbornness and arrogance. During an exchange of words between McCandless and Jim Gallien, Gallien thought that McCandless did not have the proper equipment to survive in the wild so he tried to convince him to get the necessary gear and equipment but McCandless refused to do so. “Gallien thought the hitchhiker’s scheme was foolhardy and tried repeatedly to dissuade him: “I said the hunting wasn’t easy where he was going, that he could go for days without killing any game. When that didn’t work, I tried to scare him with bear stories. I told him that a twenty-two probably wouldn’t do anything to a grizzly except make him mad.
Chris McCandless was a traveler and nature enthusiast. He wanted to get away from life in society and be with himself for a little. In Into the WIld, Jon Krakauer characterizes Christopher McCandless as Brave and Unprepared. Chris was a brave man. He went into the toughest wild by himself.
Jon Krakauer in the book, Into The Wild(1996) investigates a young man named Christopher McCandless that went missing in the Alaskan wilderness. Krakauer talks about his investigation by writing about where McCandless traveled and who he talked to before he went missing. Krakauer talks about McCandless and the mistakes that he made during his travels. The main reason for McCandless’s death was because of how stubborn and reckless he was. First off, Chris was not prepared for his journey in Alaska.
He gave away his possessions, including his savings, and set out on a journey that would ultimately lead to his death. There are several reasons why McCandless can be seen as a fool. First, he was unprepared for the harsh Alaskan wilderness. He lacked proper gear, supplies, and training. He didn't bring a map or a compass, and he didn't have any experience living off the land.
In the non-fiction piece, Into the Wild, by Jon Krakauer, the audience follows young Christopher McCandless through his journey across the American west to his inevitable death, dragging Krakauer in the narrative throughout. In a story about the life and death of the young boy, Krakauer continuously interjects his own experience and beliefs regarding Chris’ travels relentlessly. In this way, the author represents a perspective on Chris contrasting many criticisms of the young man, though Krakauer carries his own criticisms of the young adventurer. Jon Krakauer, author of Into the Wild, inserts himself into the text through his personal experience and connection to Christopher McCandless and his beliefs effectively providing contrast to those
He felt that he could live by himself in the wilderness without them, which didn't workout that way. In Krakauer's novel he mentions McCandless “wanted to prove to himself that he could make it own his own, without anybody else’s help.” (Krakauer 159) which shows how rebellious McCandless really was. I think if he wasn’t so rebellious and had different philosophical views that he wouldn’t have made the actions he did to go into the Alaskan wilderness and would've lived a normal
“Look deep into nature, and then you will understand everything better”-Albert Einstein. Chris McCandless had to find out who he truly was as an individual by leaping out into the wild and isolating himself. The inspirations of Jack London, Henry David Thoreau and Leo Tolstoy guided Chris into the wild of the unknown to search for true bliss and meaning to his life. He believed that that in order to be one with oneself you must remove yourself out of society and push yourself physically and mentally to take in and comprehend the fullest understanding of life. Chris grew up never worrying about money, easily relating to Tolstoy in the sense of their family being well supported.
His continuous urge to live according to his values suggests that he is a brave soul. Similarly, he is courageous during his journey to the Alaskan wilderness. Throughout his life, McCandless abstained from receiving help from others. When hitching a ride from Jim Gallien in the freezing weather to Alaska, Gallien notices that "his gear seemed exceedingly minimal for the harsh conditions of the interior... Alex's cheap leather hiking boots… and his rifle only .22 caliber, a bore too small to kill any large animals...
When McCandless was in Alaska he was fully self-reliant, hunting and gathering supplies. Krakauer needs to rely on others to bring him his supplies. Mcandless doesn’t have to rely on others like Krakauer did, in fact, one of Mcandless's biggest concerns was not being fully
In Into the Wild written by Jon Krakauer, the circumstances surrounding Chris McCandless’s death in the Alaskan wilderness have led some to argue that his lack of preparedness and disregard for safety is a tragic waste of his life. McCandless’s story begins with the discovery of his body by Alaskan hunters who visit Denali National Park and Preserve. Krakauer, tells the story of McCandless, a young man who left behind his comfortable life to live in the wilderness of Alaska. The text explores themes such as the pursuit of individualism, the search for meaning in life, and the dangers of idealism. Throughout the publication, Krakauer examines McCandless’s motivations and decisions and attempts to unravel the mystery of why he chose to leave
He achieved his goal of seeing parts of Alaska that most people would dream of doing but wouldn’t actually conquer it because they are too scared of what might be out there. To start off, McCandless felt as though he accomplished his goal from the journey that he went on because of all the passion that he had for nature. Nothing stopped him from going out into the
What really drove Chris McCandless into the wild? I believe the top three of the countless reasons that drove McCandless into the wild was the emotional damage from his parents, rebellion of the youth & risk taking tendencies, and his hubris and detestation against authority and/or someone telling him what to do. Some may believe that Chris McCandless went into the wild because of his literary heroes Leo Tolstoy, Ralph Waldo Emerson, Henry David Thoreau , and Jack London but the real reason he left everything was because of those reasons. In this essay I will elaborate on why I believe those are the reasons that drove McCandless into the wild.
This is just one of the many people who comment on McCandless’s small weight. This shows that McCandless was constantly hungry, but he still did not decide to go home. He enjoyed living this way. Also, he encountered many unpleasant events in the wild such as “a crown [falling] off one of his molars” (Krakauer 164) and “fly and mosquito hordes” (Krakauer 166). These events were months before his death, so he could have decided to go home before it was too late, but he does not.
Chris McCandless was a college student with a need for adventure. On April 28, 1992, he left on a journey which would lead to the end of his life. After news of his death had reached public ear, most people came to the same conclusion: Chris McCandless was an uneducated, arrogant boy who went on a journey seeking death. However, in the novel Into the Wild, Jon Krakaur portrays Chris McCandless’ transcendental quest as a journey full of wonder. Throughout the novel, Krakaur defines McCandless as an intelligent, hard working, determined young man.
Into the Wild by Jon Krakauer is a biography that follows Chris McCandless and his journey through the wilderness while finding himself along the way. Chris McCandless died in the August of 1992 after a four month journey through places like Mexico and Alaska. Krakauer investigates his actions and analyzes his identity after his death, trying to find meaning within his seemingly unnecessary expedition. Chris McCandless constructs his personal identity as a man who wanted to be challenged and inspired by his actions and interests with people he met on the road, and his beliefs and values as a stubborn person. Chris McCandless’s actions are unusual in many ways; for one, he graduates college with honors, but instead of pursuing a career,