Extended Essay
Title: To what extent is language used to persuade the public about the possible threats of global warming?
Abstract:
The language of global warming is widespread and almost everyone is familiar with it. Children are taught it starting as early as in the primary years. When we hear words like ‘greenhouse effect, cfc’s and ozone layer’ we can visualize polar bears without ice, smog over big cities in developing countries and sun rays penetrating the skies and burning our skin and causing cancer. The language and terms used for discussing global warming are not new. According to the University Corporation for Atmospheric Research, the term 'greenhouse effect' was coined in the early 1800’s and at that time it was used to describe
…show more content…
9
Manipulating people perception 10 – 11
Advertising technologies 12 – 15
Conclusion
…show more content…
This is why I am interested in this topic because I know English is one of the dominant languages of the world.
The issue of global warming has developed to become a controversial question around the world and my research question shows how people are being manipulated into believing Global warming through language, what are the reasons that people become easily to be persuaded?
The issue was first starting to make headlines in the 1980’s with the foundation of the IPCC. In 1988 ‘The IPCC or, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change was created. It was set up by the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) and the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) to prepare, based on available scientific information, assessments on all aspects of climate change and its impacts with a view of formulating realistic response strategies.’ It was at this point in history that we were first being told that ‘SOMETHING IS GOING
In Dangling Particles, Lisa Randall argues that the lack of good communication between scientists and the public leads to misunderstandings and problems; therefore, communicating clearly and genuinely is essential for scientific development because science matters to all people. The use of terminology in scientific articles is the main factor leading to miscommunications. Many scientific articles use difficult terms that are unclear to common people because not everyone has a background in science. For instance, the term “Global Warming” had lead to many debates because people had thought that this meant the earth is getting warmer. That’s why the term was changed to “Climate Change” in order to avoid misunderstandings.
We are like boiling frogs, Failing to act against climate change. As the severity of the situation continues to increase the world is reaching catastrophic levels. The recent article, “It's not too late to stave off the climate crisis, U.N. report finds” by Lauren Sommer, uses persuasive language to alert the public that the time to act on climate change is now. The world has enough technology and solutions to fix this problem as stated in the article whilst the author uses pathos to help support the quote.
Global warming has been a growing issue to global security, with nations all around the world working to ease the soon possible negative effects. Throughout the world; many media outlets and sources online have covered and have formally addressed this topic. Each media and sources all holds bits of truths inside of them, however, all cannot be entirely unbiased. Most if not online sources covering this topic; list good reasons to battle climate change, due to this they all have their own manipulative techniques used to persuade the audience, favoring the liberal side CNN writes sources and has experts in specific fields to cover a topic relating to their political agenda, Nasa being a very pro-science uses logos to persuade the audience, CNS
A few months ago, strange, frigid weather was sweeping across the nation. Some places saw their first snowfall in eight years. Other cities ended up being colder than cities that were closer to the North Pole. Scientists believe that this is because of global warming. Some people don’t believe that this weird weather means that global warming is a serious thing: “Some question how it could be so cold if the planet is heating up.
When dealing with the facts of life, many people like to be lied to because they believe that it would lessen the hopeless feeling the news would bring. However, when dealing with issues such as global warming and pollution, the matter should be dealt with in the strictest and most truthful manner due to the severity of the issue. Many authors have published fictional books about events that may happen if humans do not change their ways, however, it heavily relies on the reader’s emotion to empathize with the main character and some events that occur is speculative. When it comes to non-fiction pieces about global warming, like in the article like “Coming Home,” by Roy Scranton, this article is rooted in statics and real life events and are
Our current President, Donald J. Trump, has spread false information many times, but in December 2012 he tweeted “The concept of global warming was created by and for the Chinese in order to make U.S. manufacturing non-competitive” (1). A person with high publicity that can spread a message to millions shouldn’t spread propaganda that is anti-science. As a nation we can’t be swayed to believe that a group of individuals are being sensitive and
Al Gore, an elected official and environmental activist gave a speech in April 2004 at Yale University called, “The Climate Emergency,” which argued that there was an immediate need for a change in the rapid decline of our climate and environment at the hand of human actions. Through facts, statistics and appeals to his audience’s emotions, Gore shows that as a result of extreme climate conditions, our environment has taken a turn for the worse. Al Gore wanted to illustrate leading causes of negative climate change through the use of our rising population, new technology, and our way of thinking in order to prove that it is because of human action that we haven’t found a solution to this climate emergency. Gore’s educated audience at Yale
Almost anyone who will read this essay has undoubtedly heard of the climate phenomenon Global warming. Global warming is a topic that gets discussed very often nowadays, most notably during political debate and discussion. Politicians use certain stances on global warming to appeal to voter’s emotions and logic in order to gain votes and support for their campaign, however climate change is nothing new, during the past several hundred thousand years the Earth has heated up and cooled down and even experienced so called “ice ages”, which is a period where glacial deposits located at the northern and southern hemispheres have grown due to dramatic global cool downs. Don’t be confused by climate terminology though, the global warming so widely
In the article ‘Why Bother?’ Michael Pollan, a Professor of Journalism at the University of California, examines the dangers of climate change and how ordinary citizens can reduce its effects on the environment. Although most scientists are concerned and have warned nations of its disastrous effects some still deny the existence of climate change. As if melting ice caps and the ever-increasing blue waters were not enough proof, some citizens believe that climate change is an “unproven theory or a negligible contribution to natural climate variability” (Hall 3). Nevertheless, citizens who believe in global warning can change how they live for the better.
Thumberg presents herself as well-educated and prepared, by using memorization she approaches the audience with a lot of confidence and information: “Rich countries like Sweden need to start reducing emissions by at least 15% every year, that is so we can stay below a two- degree warming target.” Thunberg appeals to the audience's sense of logic and reason by informing them with real statistics. She makes clear, and logical connections between her idea’s and includes the use of facts and statistcs to convince the audience. “We already have an extra level of warming perhaps as high as 0.5-1.1 degrees celsius.” By using reliable sources and statistics she proves to the audience that Climate Change is a very real crisis and that she isn't lying or being biased.
Nancy Lord’s Early Warming and Elizabeth Kolbert’s “The Darkening Sea” both discuss how global warming is affecting the world. Lord and Kolbert talk about the negative result of climate change and try to raise awareness to global warming. Both Lord’s Early Warming and Kolbert’s “The Darkening Sea” use many different kinds of rhetorical strategies throughout their text. In Lord’s Early Warming, Lords relates to the community about climate change and tells stories about how global warming has affected many people around us.
The recipient is affected by superficial level of the communication for instance visual and social factors. The more arguments are going to be given to the receiver, the greater probability that he or she will be persuaded. The receiver is not motivated or involved, then it is recommended to include in the message attractive source factors. In contrast to central processing route, it is quantity of arguments that is crucial, receivers persuaded by the peripheral route are passive, they are not highly involved in the topic and the message, they are not likely to investigate and pay much attention to the main information, and due to those facts That is why attitudes shaped or reinforced in such way, are mostly of short duration.
Speech Outline I. Introduction A. Attention Grabber and Introduction Paragraph: The Earth is warming and places are burning. Water is rising, and cities are flooding. The air isn’t safe to breathe in certain areas. Global warming is responsible for all this.
The first question “What is Global Warming?” Global warming is the gradual increase of the temperature of earth 's atmosphere and oceans. In simple word, it means the global is hotter and hotter day by day.
Name: Khalid Albaiji Section: SC135 TOPIC: Global Warming GENERAL PURPOSE: To Persuade SPECIFIC PURPOSE: To persuade my audience to aware them about the harmful effects of Global Warming and encourage the audience to help make a difference to stop global warming.