Comparison of anti-colonialist struggles
In this article, I would like to analyze the history of anti-colonialist struggles in Africa and India by viewing ideas of Concerning Violence by Franz Fanon and Gandhi’s Non-violent power in Actions. Both Franz Fanon and Mahatma Gandhi were great philosophers and revolutionary writers. Their intellectual works were influential in leading anti-colonial revolution, political freedom and human right movement. Their insightful thoughts finally inspired their colonized countrymen to fight for decolonization and independence. Though their philosophies positively impacted anti-colonialism movement, they were not the same in terms of employing violence. I will illustrate my opinions by first reviewing their meaningful thoughts and then comparing them in my analysis.
Mahatma Gandhi was the prominent hero of Indian Independence. Reflecting the history of
…show more content…
Gandhi believed that hurting people was not necessary to achieve a satisfactory outcome. The abuse of immoral approach, such as violence and discrimination to Gandhi was of no use to protest British colonizers. Gandhi’s nonviolence disobedience derived from Indian spiritual and religious environment. Abstaining violence was a useful means to change the society and political conditions in Gandhi’s practice and rejecting the use of war was applied as an alternative to armed struggle against oppression. Gandhi advocated his philosophy of nonviolence in their “Britain Quits” campaign and it took in different forms such as mindful persuasion, noncooperation education and adoption of interventions in economical, social and political fields. After decades of civil disobedience and violence resistance, Gandhi eventually achieved the peaceful independence of India and avoided wounds of people’s lives. His nonviolence was not a passive movement but a noble spiritual and philosophical
For many years India struggled greatly for their independence. The three major events in the Indian fight against British rule were: the Golden Temple Massacre, the Salt March, and the homespun movement. During the Temple Massacre British and Gurkha troops killed at least 379 unarmed Indians meeting at the Jallianwala Bagh, to discuss nonviolent resistance and protest. However, the British had passed a law that said they were forbidden from encouraging and having meetings about nonviolent protests. The Salt March, which took place in India, was an act of civil disobedience.
Gandhi once said, “An eye-for-an-eye makes the whole world blind.” What he meant is that fighting violence with violence helped no one. During his lifetime, Gandhi fought against oppressive British rule in India, and his journey was known throughout the world. Martin Luther King Jr. and Nelson Mandela both shared Gandhi’s thirst for freedom, basing their respective movements for peace on Gandhi’s. All three men fought peacefully for equality, whether it was for India’s freedom from the British empire, emancipation from apartheid laws that prohibited black Africans from being truly free, or liberation from Jim Crow laws to keep black Americans inferior to whites.
It is out of the selfless act of heroes and heroines of civil disobedience such as Mahatma Gandhi that the society is enjoying the fruits today. This speech is going to demonstrate how civil disobedience has played roles in social reforms, containing unjust rulings
Gandhi people manage their anger and have peace against the British. He did this by creating a philosophy and encouraging people to follow that philosophy. Gandhi also used peace instead of violence against the British. Gandhi did this because he believed that he can achieve peace among everybody. Gandhi’s philosophy didn't work on everyone.
Imperialism is a policy by a stronger nation to create an empire by dominating weaker nations economically, politically, culturally, or militarily. There are many that are for imperialism but also many who are against it. After hearing from both sides of the argument about imperialism, I feel that imperialism is wrong because of moral and political, racial and economic reasons. Some that are for imperialism may think that it is a good thing for us because it makes the U.S bigger and stronger. I feel as though we already have enough responsibilities and difficulties as it is so why should we want to expand and dominate when that is only going to add onto the responsibilities and difficulties.
This tactic allows Chavez to gain credibility, which strengthens his overall argument that peaceful protest is key to truly changing the world. He continues to portray nonviolence in a favorable light by using Mahatma Gandhi as a prevalent historical example. Gandhi is a famous advocate for nonviolent protest, as he successfully gained India’s independence from Britain in the 1940s. With the use of Gandhi’s example, Chavez proves that nonviolent tactics can be truly effective in bringing forth change, and can even suppress the violence to create peace. Directly following this example however, Chavez illustrates the detrimental effects that a violent conflict has on a community.
Intro “Freedom is never granted; it is won. Justice is never given; it is exacted.” This quote by A.Philip Randolph is brought to life by and applies greatly to Mahatma Gandhi, an Indian man who dedicated his life to obtaining his country's independence from British rule. He fought for his country’s freedom and in acquiring it, obtained justice.
Mohandas Gandhi was a “key figure in the Indian struggle for independence.” He worked to use nonviolent ways to fight for equality and change in India. Gandhi was able to unite many groups and “inspired the common people of India to work for change.” In addition, Gandhi advocated using a more traditional approach (Wadley 202). Although Mohandas Gandhi 's satyagraha campaign caused violence, his advocacy for those who were discriminated against in Indian society led to the initial unification of India to gain independence from Great Britain.
Civil Disobedience by Thoreau is the refusal to obey government demands or commands and nonresistance to consequent arrest and punishment this had an extreme effect on Martin Luther King Jr and Mahatma Gandhi. They were fighting for different beliefs. However they both had the same believes about civil disobedience and they both end in the same place, jail. In the first place Gandhi believed that the only way to confronted injustice was with non-violent methods.
India’s leader Mohandas Gandhi (Mahatma Gandhi) was influenced by David Thoreau 's Civil Disobedience arguments while sitting in jail. Gandhi loosely adopted the term “civil disobedience” for non-violent protests and refused to cooperate with injustice. Following his release, he protested the registration law by joining labor strikes and organizing a large non-violent march. After the marches, the Boer government finally agreed to end the most divisive sections of the law. In 1907, he campaigned in South Africa and wrote a translated synopsis of Thoreau 's argument for the Indian Opinion.
The nonviolence worked because people were willing to sacrifice themselves for the greater good. “But whether or not we succeeded in obtaining these conveniences, every one of us was firm in his resolution of passing his term in jail in perfect happiness and peace.” (Document C, Gandhi). Gandhi’s followers knew the price they would have to pay for their civil disobedience, and they all accepted it. Their unwavering loyalty kept their movement alive.
Gandhi always made sure that they kept the movement nonviolent. They had meetings on how they were going to approach the movement, they were organized and had a plan. Gandhi got many of his ideas and principles through reading the bible, reading the Bhagavad Gita, and writers like Henry David Thoreau. Gandhi and the Indian people created some dilemmas to throw the British government off balance. Gandhi told the Indian people to boycott all British goods and only buy Indian goods.
Gandhi talked about Gandhi and Thoreau are recognize how both talked against the
Malcolm X and Mahatma Gandhi were two incredible men, both fighting for independence among their people. These distinctly different men were among the strongest fighters who set foot in authority. Malcolm X, an African-American leader spread religion to combat the weakening of his fellow African-Americans, as well as to expand the supporters of Muslim beliefs. Mahatma Gandhi, a leader in India’s independence movement from the British, weakened British rule through civil resistance. While Malcolm X and Gandhi both fought for their people’s freedom, their religion, beliefs, and methods for achieving independence differ in certain aspects but also have similar elements.
This is true, violence cannot solve people 's problems. Gandhi, a prominent leader, believed in civil disobedience as he stated in his letter to the British Officials in India. Gandhi writes “And the conviction is growing deeper and deeper in me that nothing but unadulterated non- violence can check the organised violence” (Gandhi). Gandhi truly and deeply believed that nonviolence is more pure and will overcome violence. Gandhi was both a civil rights activist and leader.