ipl-logo

How King Hammurabi's Codes Were Unjust?

701 Words3 Pages

Visualize having a king who made 282 laws and if a person did not follow them they would get a really big punishment. That is how it was 4,000 years ago when a king named Hammurabi ruled in Babylon. He ruled Babylon for 42 years. King Hammurabi became king of Babylon in 1754 BCE. Were Hammurabi’s laws and codes fair and just? King Hammurabi’s codes were unjust because of the evidence found in the 282 laws. The codes that King Hammurabi wrote about were personal injury law, property law and family law.

First, there is evidence that the codes were unjust. The first, code was personal injury law. For example, in law 218 it states “If a surgeon has operated with a bronze lancet on a free man for a serious injury, and has caused a death, . . .his …show more content…

The third code is family law. In law 195 it says, “If a son has struck his father, his hands shall be cut off.” The son should be punished however, cutting off his hands is very extreme. There is no age listed in this law and what if it was a child? In law 129 it also shows that the laws were unjust. Another reason is “If a married lady is caught [in adultery] with another man, they shall bind them and cast them into water.” This is also a very harsh punishment. The last law is law 148. The last reason is, “If a man has married a wife and a disease has seized her, if he is determined to marry a second wife, he shall marry her. He shall not divorce the wife whom the disease has seized. She shall dwell in the house they have built together, and he shall maintain her as long as she lives.” This is unjust because you should not leave your sick wife alone and marry another woman. Many people think king Hammurabi’s laws were just, but they were not just because of that evidence. Justice is not absolute in this because people worked hard to make a marriage,

Show More
Related

  • Hammurabi's Code Dbq Analysis

    657 Words  | 3 Pages

    Hammurabi’s Code DBQ King Hammurabi’s rule began in the city of Babylon. He later then extended his control by taking over Larsa and Mari a large part of Mesopotamia. After expanding his land, Shamash, the god of justice presented him with a code of 232 laws (Doc A). These laws were then influenced throughout the community and were considered a part of the communities culture. I disagree with Hammurabi’s code because most laws were to cruel and targeted certain people.

    Read More

  • To What Extent Was Hammurabi's Code Was It Just Dbq

    373 Words  | 2 Pages

    Hammurabi’s Code Was It Just? Hammurabi’s code was just because of his personal injury laws. My first piece of evidence that his personal injury laws were just is that he says in doc B that he will protect the weak. He says Hammurabi the protecting king am I.

    Read More

  • To What Extent Was The Code Of Hammurabi Code Just Dbq

    831 Words  | 4 Pages

    He also claimed that multiple gods including Shamash gave him the right to rule. The laws were displayed all over the place on humongous stone steeles which is a pillar-like structure. The question now is, was Hammurababi’s code just or unjust? Hammurabi’s code was unjust because not everyone was treated equally, it couldn’t be changed, and it was written from one perspective. To start, Hammurabi’s code was unjust because it treated people of different social classes differently.

    Read More

  • Hammurabi Dbq Research Paper

    841 Words  | 4 Pages

    How cool would it be to have something stolen from you and a new one would be given to you for free? Almost 4,000 years ago there was a man named Hammurabi and he had that rule. Hammurabi ruled for 42 years; he was the ruler of most of Mesopotamia. He also wrote his own code including the laws and their punishments; it was the most complete code that was ever made. The main question about Hammurabi was are his laws fair.

    Read More

  • Was Hammurabi's Code Just Dbq Analysis

    775 Words  | 4 Pages

    He wrote laws using the writing system, Cuneiform. Some of these laws were harsh. Maybe too harsh. Were these laws just? Was Hammurabi’s code just?

    Read More

  • Hammurabi: A Powerful Ruler Of Babylon

    394 Words  | 2 Pages

    Hammurabi’s Code covered many issues, including trade, marriage, and divorce. I believe that Hammurabi’s code was fair and just. There many reasons why Hammurabi’s code was fair. For example, Property Law number 21 states: “If a man has broken through the wall [to rob] a house, they shall put him to death and pierce him, or hang him in the hole in the wall which he has made.” This law is fair because if you broke through someone’s wall, they will have to spend lots of time and money to repair it.

    Read More

  • Why Is The Code Of Hammurabi Unfair

    696 Words  | 3 Pages

    (Code of Hammurabi 3). One of the more reasonable laws, the punishment of the father leaving the city is appropriate because he should face consequences for taking advantage of his daughter in a sexual way. Thus, Hammurabi’s Code regarding family laws are both fair and just because it established guidelines for citizens’

    Read More

  • Essay On Hammurabi's Code Just

    875 Words  | 4 Pages

    Was Hammurabi’s code just? Nearly 4,000 years ago, a man named Hammurabi became king of a city state called babylon. Hammurabi made a very important code in 18th century B.C.E. Hammurabi made 282 laws and he made these codes to protect the weak and poor from the strong. There are areas of law where Hammurabi’s code can be shown to be both, just and unjust. These are Family Law, Property Law, and Personal Injury Law.

    Read More

  • Hammurabi's Code Vs Modern Law

    489 Words  | 2 Pages

    Hammurabi's code and the modern laws have several similarities and differences. For example, they are both intended to maintain order in society. However, Hammurabi’s code is far more violent than modern law. Also, they have different ways of handling things, different punishments, and different social structure. One way that Hammurabi’s Code and the Modern Laws are different is because Hammurabi’s Code is strictly based on social structure.

    Read More

  • Hammurabi Dbq Essay

    859 Words  | 4 Pages

    Some things we know about Hammurabi is that he was a king for 42 years! In addition to that he was a king of a city state in Mesopotamia called, Babylon. Something else about Hammurabi is that he took power in 1792 BCE. Hammurabi also developed a code totaling an astonishing 282 laws. My question I need to answer is, Was Hammurabi’s Code Fair?

    Read More

  • How Is Hammurabi Unfair

    675 Words  | 3 Pages

    Hammurabi's code is unjust. Hammurabi did try to do what was right by trying to have a community with justice, but the laws are very unequal and harsh. These laws would not last in today's

    Read More

  • Was Hammurabi's Laws Just Or Unjust?

    334 Words  | 2 Pages

    Laws were as important in Hammurabi 's time as they are today because laws keep people safe and keeps everything fair. Hammurabi was a famous Babylonian king who ruled over Mesopotamia. He created the first set of written laws in his 38th year of his reign called the law code. He did this because he wanted to keep peace and order over Mesopotamia even if the laws were harsh. Many people are arguing over if Hammurabi 's code is just or unjust.

    Read More

  • Hammurabi Dbq Analysis

    755 Words  | 4 Pages

    Hammurabi claimed that his laws were both just and helpful to a wide range of people, but the majority of the laws don’t support either of his claims. In the instance of many laws, he appears to be very drastic with his consequences. In one of his codes, he says that if a women is caught in adultery with another man, both people must be tied up and thrown into the water (doc C, law 129). The act of binding the two people together and drowning them is a very specific and extreme repercussion for cheating. Another example of Hammurabi’s unnecessary harshness, was the law stating that if a man has broken into another’s house he shall be put to death by piercing him or hanging him in the hole which he made in the house (doc D, law 21).

    Read More

  • The Judgments Of Hammurabi In The Tale Of The Eloquent Peasant

    1138 Words  | 5 Pages

    The Judgments of Hammurabi are a set of laws that were written by a god. The laws were put in place “to promote the welfare of the people, to cause justice to prevail in the land, and so the strong might not oppress the weak.” The Tale of The Eloquent Peasant, depicts how a peasant has been robbed of his goods and how he eloquently appeals to the king for justice to be served. Both articles discuss; the division of a society’s social class, how gods/kings interpret justice and family relationships within the law. The Judgments of Hammurabi laid out the rules for Mesopotamian citizens.

    Read More

  • Code Of Hammurabi Essay

    731 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Code of Hammurabi was written by King Hammurabi and were the first set of laws to ever be created. Hammurabi created 282 laws, that set standards in his empire and in ancient Mesopotamia. Hammurabi made it clear that the laws were not only to equalize society but also establish fairness and also protect the weak from the strong. However, according to the laws, the punishment for men, women, rich, and the poor, were all different; leading that he made the laws unfair. The women of Mesopotamia had a series of laws where it clearly shows they were classified as property.

    Read More

More about How King Hammurabi's Codes Were Unjust?

Open Document