ipl-logo

How Successful Was Henry II

543 Words3 Pages

One of the problems Henry II faced was the barons. Under Stephen the baron had become too powerful and Henry had the issue of regaining this power. Many baron had taken advantage over Stephens lack of control and authority, several barons built castles without asking the kings permission and had taken over large areas of land Henry had to reassert his authority as the barons where becoming too powerful. If the barons carried on as they were Henrys fate would have ultimately reflected that of Stephens. Also the barons would have been seen as undreaming the king’s power and authority. Henry took control of the situation by demolishing the illegal castles built in Stephens’s reign the barons saw this as an attack on baronial power but the king was asserting his authority and keeping the barons on a tight leash to prevent them from becoming too powerful. Furthermore Henry had the problem of resolving the splits in the country which had caused confusion. During Stephens reign there were resentments from supporters. Henry had to regain the support of his people as he would not have been able to …show more content…

The Scottish king began taking land in the North east of England bordering Henrys II kingdom, he had to regain all the land that had been taken by the Scottish king in steepens reign. If he allowed the king to keep the land it would have made him looked weak. Additionally the Church was a major problem for Henry II Stephen gave so much power to the church Henry had to regain the power to stop the church from having too much control. Henry II right to the throne was his “Divine right” if the church was seen as discounted from the king by the people they would have rebelled because at this point in time the church was a big factor in people lives Henry faced many problem becoming king which were largely due to Stephen and his lack of control. Henry II effectively dealt with many of the situations which lead him to assert his

Show More
Related

  • How Did Henry Viii Influence Rome

    1230 Words  | 5 Pages

    This is shown through Henry recognising the importance of finance in methods of gaining power through loyalty and outside the country, as stated above and in the use of bonds and recognisances to consolidate his dynasty. This is demonstrated additionally in Henry’s use of the Chamber System where Henry would personally check all the items of income received in the chamber and sign each one, and the position of Treasurer of the Chamber was held by two of the king’s most beloved servants; Sir Thomas Lovell and Sir John Heron. However there is one unconvincing phrase in the interpretation of Henry’s attitude towards money, that his reputation as a miser was a result of a ‘misunderstanding of his policies’ which doesn’t take into account the extortionate reputation of Empsen and Dudley through their exploitation, therefore not showing the full extent of Henry’s dedication to

    Read More

  • How Successful Was Henry In Restoring Royal Authority By 1170

    1127 Words  | 5 Pages

    How successful was Henry in restoring royal authority by 1170? Henry had the essential and perilous task of restoring royal authority. Under Stephen it could be deemed that there was little or no royal authority in place so when Henry came to power he had to lay down the basic fundamentals before he made serious drastic changes.

    Read More

  • Henry Fleming's Beliefs Of Soldiers In The Civil War

    606 Words  | 3 Pages

    Henry's confidence is somewhat based on the curiosity of his young age. He is confident that war will bring him honor and glory, but he doesn’t yet realise the hardships that are associated with war. “He felt that in this crisis his laws of life were useless. Whatever he had learned of himself was here of no avail. He was an unknown quantity.”

    Read More

  • What Extent Did King Henry Did Not Face A Genuine Threat To His Position As King

    994 Words  | 4 Pages

    “Henry did not face a genuine threat to his position as King from 1485-99.” Explain why you agree or disagree with this view. [25 marks] I find I partly disagree with the statement. Although it’s true that Henry VII was able to overcome all of the major threats to his reign during this period of time, and some of these threats were not as major as others - that does not necessarily mean any of the events were not dangerous enough to jeopardise Henry’s position as King. Notably, Perkin Warbeck’s ability to gain support from many royals around Europe put Henry into a position where he could likely be usurped, had Henry not been smart with his foreign relations, and had the imposter had sufficient military support in order to successfully land in England.

    Read More

  • Patrick Henry Ethos Pathos Logos

    561 Words  | 3 Pages

    Henry says "They tell us, sir, that we are weak; unable to cope with so formidable an adversary. But when shall we be stronger? Will it be the next week or the next year? " Henry is appealing to logic by discussing the weakening spirit within the colonies due to the Intolerable Acts. It’s important because by knowing the weaknesses we know how to become stronger.

    Read More

  • Consolidation Of Royal Authority: Due To Henry VII

    1545 Words  | 7 Pages

    ‘The consolidation of royal authority, in the years 1487-1509, was due to Henry VII’s control over the nobility.’ Explain why you agree or disagree with this view. It can be argued to a certain extent that the consolidation of royal authority for Henry VII, in the years 1487-1509, was a result of control over the nobility. The challenge lied in the ability to decrease their power without alienating them whilst removing their position of threat. However, there were other contributory factors in Henry’s consolidation of his royal authority, such as his diplomatic skills in dealing with foreign powers and the indispensable use of royal finances.

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis: Give Me Liberty Or Give Me Death

    793 Words  | 4 Pages

    The image of imprisonment creates fear and rebellion among the colonists and motivates them to think that Henry 's claim is more

    Read More

  • Logos And Ethos In Henry David's Civil Disobedience

    610 Words  | 3 Pages

    But they put themselves in a level with wood and earth and stones [...] than men of straw or a lump of dirt’’. Henry’s ethos shows the audience of his strategy of going against the government corruption. Henry’s speech was well-planned out to shows his audience of his experience when rebelling the government; in addition, receiving forced punishment for not paying his poll-tax. He thought out things that made himself to commit this disobedience against the government and wanted to express his experience of his ideas and strategy to disobey the government.

    Read More

  • The Red Badge Of Courage: A Soldier's Dilemma

    802 Words  | 4 Pages

    Henry’s flawed nature and inner desire to be morally upright are revealed as he escapes the battle and as he justifies himself

    Read More

  • Comparing Rhetorical Strategies In Henry V And Joan Of Arc

    871 Words  | 4 Pages

    Although Henry did not alway carry himself with much dignity in his early years, he is portrayed as a powerful and honorable. Being a king puts him at the top of the social ladder, and garners respect from almost all below him. Along with this respect though, comes expectations. Henry is expected to be fearless and fair based upon his position in society.

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of Patrick Henry

    2011 Words  | 9 Pages

    Henry fought against Lord Dunmore , who ordered all the gunpowder taken away from local patriot forces. He believes that fighting for ones freedom is a great responsibility of God and their country, he aligns God on their side of the colonists. The outcome would have been different if henry wouldn’t have announced his meaningful speech , war would haven’t happened

    Read More

  • Is The Rhetorical Question In Patrick Henry's Persuasive Speech

    184 Words  | 1 Pages

    Patrick Henry’s use of rhetorical questions aided his persuasive speech to the Virginia Convention. First of all, he used a rhetorical question when he said, “Shall we try argument,” (Henry 101). This quote proves that the common people shouldn’t attempt to create a dispute between themselves & Britain. He said this because he didn’t want things to get more worse than they already were.

    Read More

  • What Is The Use Of Ethos In Patrick Henry's Speech

    699 Words  | 3 Pages

    His well structured speech touched the people, gave them courage. Henry's speech made them consider he was right and war was soon to begin. Henry's use of of rhetorical devices helped make his speech more powerful. Henry’s use of ethos helps him gain people's trust and helps encourage them to do what is right.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Patrick Henry And Thomas Jefferson

    854 Words  | 4 Pages

    The implication is that the people are being ruled. Henry used his skills in speech to persuade the Council or Parliament that trying to rule over others was wrong. He spoke out against the way things had always been done and

    Read More

  • The Importance Of Duality In Shakespeare's Henry V

    538 Words  | 3 Pages

    Henry’s temper is hard for him to control because he is sometimes faced with situations when he cannot distinguish between King Henry and friend Henry. This duality, paired with the duality that is being a king is an obvious cause for confusion and rage. Henry had such a strong bond with his old friends, that when his new friends were so quick to betray him he was deeply hurt. Another time Henry exhibits incomplete control of his temper is during the battle of Agincourt. Throughout the battle, Henry’s soldiers have taken many French soldiers prisoner and seem to have the advantage.

    Read More

More about How Successful Was Henry II

Open Document