ipl-logo

How Successful Was Henry In Restoring Royal Authority By 1170

1127 Words5 Pages

How successful was Henry in restoring royal authority by 1170? Henry had the essential and perilous task of restoring royal authority. Under Stephen it could be deemed that there was little or no royal authority in place so when Henry came to power he had to lay down the basic fundamentals before he made serious drastic changes. A smooth running of the government was essential in restoring royal authority, it was imperative that the people knew there was an effective and powerful government in place in order for them to subject to royal authority. Under Stephen not only was the government weak due to the lack of control and organisation by Stephen but it was also severely disconnected. Sessions of the Exchequer had not been …show more content…

Henry reformed, reshaped and fundamentally altered the law of the land creating a framework for English common law. Under Stephen thieves were left unpunished and many had escaped justice, church men did as they pleased without any implications, there was anarchy in terms of justice in Stephens reign. Henry created an impressive justice system which laid the precedent for the future. There was the Kings and County courts which dealt with land disputes and serious crimes and then there was the Hundred and Vill courts which dealt with small and less serious crime. Furthermore Henry created the Honourial court which was for barons and the Manorial courts which was for knights. They both dealt with land disputes between tenants and heard mostly petty crimes. Finally there was the Ecclesiastical court which dealt with crimes committed by the clergy, land disputes concerning the church and moral crimes. This effective structure ensured royal authority was restored. The question of proof combined with testifying under oath, introduction of juries and the Mort d’ ancestor changed the way how people were found guilt and convicted. For Henry the justice system was the most important and efficient way in asserting royal authority. However some parts of the system had been in place long before Henry II, the ordeal by iron, water and battle had been around since Henry I and William I, it was only that Stephen did not enforce the law but the creation of laws was already in place. Henry systematised the law, he did create some new procedures in an attempt to streamline and make the previous laws more effective. He also restored royal control over certain capital crimes to ensure the crown was involved in the most serious crimes. All the reforms of law and order led many to experience royal authority in some form

Show More
Related

  • How Did Henry Vii Influence The Royal Government

    1985 Words  | 8 Pages

    Throughout his reign, Henry VII attempted and was partially successful in strengthening royal finances. He aimed to have a stronger financial base that would give him power and strength if there was a rebellion, and also to create a stable treasury for his dynasty. Henry was a rapacious and miserly character who went to many lengths in order to increase the annual income of the royals, so that they could be comparable to that of France and Spain who at the time were making a significant amount more than England. When Henry came to the throne he realised the limitations of the Exchequer to administrate crown finances and began to restore the use of the Chamber system. He was able to strengthen royal finances by implementing methods of Ordinary

    Read More

  • King John Research Paper

    862 Words  | 4 Pages

    Perhaps the most important and famous document of all time is the Magna Carta. It was the first document to establish that every man is entitled to justice and a fair trial and that even the monarch was obliged to obey the law of the land (Breay and Harrison, 2016). The extortionate taxing of barons and his people was the beginning of a revolution against King to deprive him of his absolute power. The barons (who were punished severely if they refused to pay) demanded that John obey the law. When the king refused, they retaliated (Breay and Harrison, 2016).

    Read More

  • What Extent Did King Henry Did Not Face A Genuine Threat To His Position As King

    994 Words  | 4 Pages

    “Henry did not face a genuine threat to his position as King from 1485-99.” Explain why you agree or disagree with this view. [25 marks] I find I partly disagree with the statement. Although it’s true that Henry VII was able to overcome all of the major threats to his reign during this period of time, and some of these threats were not as major as others - that does not necessarily mean any of the events were not dangerous enough to jeopardise Henry’s position as King. Notably, Perkin Warbeck’s ability to gain support from many royals around Europe put Henry into a position where he could likely be usurped, had Henry not been smart with his foreign relations, and had the imposter had sufficient military support in order to successfully land in England.

    Read More

  • To What Extent Was Henry Vii Successfully Established Royal Authority By 1487

    891 Words  | 4 Pages

    ‘Henry VII successfully established his royal authority by 1487’ I think that royal authority means that the king would have had an heir to carry on his line and his opposition has been dealt with to a suitable extent. By 1487, Henry had spent two years on the throne after defeating Richard III at the Battle of Bosworth, and within those years, I believe that Henry VII had successfully established his royal authority by 1487. However, there are arguments that suggest Henry did not successfully establish his royal authority by 1487.

    Read More

  • Consolidation Of Royal Authority: Due To Henry VII

    1545 Words  | 7 Pages

      Following the Battle of Bosworth of 1485, it was indisputable that Henry needed to establish new means of controlling the size and power of the nobility to levels which posed no threat to the throne. The Wars of the Roses 1455-85 resulted in 30 years of instability for England and thus Henry’s accession to the throne saw him take control of a fragmented country in which the crown was weak yet the nobility strong. Henry initially diluted noble power through the Act of Attainder which seized the titles and possessions of nobles suspected of disloyalty whilst simultaneously ensuring obedience as members of the nobility stood to lose everything should they be attained. Moreover, Henry was prepared to reverse an attainder if it would secure future loyalty evident in the fact that of the 138 attainders passed, 46 were later reversed.

    Read More

  • Examples Of Fairness In King Henry Viii

    573 Words  | 3 Pages

    Henry VIII did not act with a sense of justice or fairness throughout his rule, demonstrated by his disregard for both his people, but also their wishes, as he acted based only on what he wanted. Henry VIII did not follow what could be considered a moral compass - he followed his own self compass. One of the most prominent acts of selfishness that Henry committed was his separation from the Roman Catholic Church in order for him to annul his marriage to Catherine of Aragon. By separating from the RCC for solely his own reasons demonstrates that he is neither fair or just to his people, as many of them were followers of the RCC. When Henry VIII was excommunicated by pope ____, the foundation for his hatred of (this religion) began, which was

    Read More

  • How Did King Henry Viii Rule

    742 Words  | 3 Pages

    King Henry Viii Ruled over England for more than 37 years. He was best known for having 6 wives and being the driving force behind the English reformation. When Henry came to power he was described as extremely handsome and was considered to have “superior” physical attributes, but as time passed and events occurred Henry developed into a less than aesthetically pleasing man, he lost his admirable physique and repulsed those who looked upon him. Henry’s character is an aspect which is known to be widely disagreed upon, it is accepted by most that Henry was fundamentally strong, self assured, intelligent and determined.

    Read More

  • Foreign Policy And Diplomacy: The Role Of Queens In Medieval England

    1378 Words  | 6 Pages

    The Role of Queens Regnant and Consort in Medieval England; Foreign Policy and Diplomacy. England has witnessed many queens regnant or consort than kings. As a ruler in her own right or a king’s wife, each made a significant contribution to English history. These women could act freely of male impact, as well as sake of their own particular dynastic diversions. It rises questions such what it was to be regnant or consort queens in England, how was female involvement in diplomacy, what was the foreign policy agenda of queens regnant or the role of queens consort within matrimonial alliances, military treaties and political partnership with their kings ' consort.

    Read More

  • Logos And Ethos In Henry David's Civil Disobedience

    610 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the essay ‘’Civil Disobedience’’ by Henry David it teaches the very beginning moment of resistance the government for the cause of knowing something for being morally wrong. This is because of the ideas that he formed in his essay of a sharp-witted planned out study introducing the main three methods of persuasion. He included by giving each example of logos, ethos, and pathos. Henry made himself clear what he was advocating for and inspire other to do Civil disobedience movement in the near future.

    Read More

  • Why Did Absolute Monarchs Grow Their Power In The 1600s

    674 Words  | 3 Pages

    Most of the population were poor farmers, that had no idea what was happening within the country. Obviously this system was not the best. Eventually countries found a more efficient way of running their countries. A single ruler began to consolidate the power from the city-states and make a more uniform government for the country. The ways these absolute monarchs consolidated and increased their powers were similar in the 1600s and 1700s, by decreasing the nobles’ powers, increasing military, and increasing bureaucracy.

    Read More

  • King Henry's Act Of Fairness

    147 Words  | 1 Pages

    Louis had a philosophy that money was of more power than the sword this information was passed on to Henry as when he was king he made Lords pay tax to make England rich and make himself wealthier,. This was seen as an act of fairness and equality something that made Henry increasingly popular with his subjects as fairness was a good characteristic of a king and earned him respect whilst he was founding the Tudor dynasty. He showed fairness in other ways as well by publically rewarding some of his local servants, knighting 11 of them on the battlefield showing that he saw courage in those of a slower rank than him, this was probably taught to him by Francis who put Henry in care of de Rieux who was lower than him in rank but who Francis saw

    Read More

  • Henry V: Union Of Kingdoms

    529 Words  | 3 Pages

    An Interesting Union of Kingdoms In Shakespeare’s play Henry V, the union of England and France were beneficial to both countries. King Henry V desired to obtain rule of France, especially since he believed to be a rightful heir. King Charles of France would not content easily with Henry, but eventually he realized the union was for the best.

    Read More

  • Why Is King Henry Bound For Greatness

    161 Words  | 1 Pages

    Henry was bound for greatness from the moment he came into this world. His father was Henry IV and mother, Mary de Bohun. Henry was born during the time that Richard the II was king. Before becoming king, his father Henry IV had been living in exile. During that time of exile, it is believed that Richard the II, took Henry the V, under his wing.

    Read More

  • The King Ran The Courts In Medieval England

    165 Words  | 1 Pages

    The king ran the courts in Medieval England. The king 's court is a term that describes the king 's council and household. The court travelled with the king wherever he went. The king would seek advice from the wise (hopefully) men of his court which would include relatives, barons, lords, and members of the church such as bishops. The name "court" comes from the fact that most kings held court and made judgments.

    Read More

  • The Anglo-Saxon Social Structure

    547 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Anglo-Saxon social structure was divided into several social classes, which might vary from place to place. At the top was always the king. We know that the King is always ruling over the order of society and that if there any crime against him he essentially has the power to grant what he sees a fit punishment. In the Laws of King Alfred it states that “ If any one fight in the king’s hall, or draw his weapon, and he be taken; be it in the king’s doom, either death, or life, as he may be willing to grant him.” (Alfred, line 7)

    Read More

More about How Successful Was Henry In Restoring Royal Authority By 1170

Open Document