How Successful Was James VI & I In Dealing With The Problems Of Multiple Kingdoms
How successful was James VI & I in dealing with the problems of multiple kingdoms?
The success of James VI & I in the governing of the three kingdoms is a key point in historiographic debate. Whilst there are elements of James’s methods, in terms of dealing with the problems which arose due to the vast differences of the multiple kingdoms, which could have been more successful; overall the post-revisionist view of James’s success seems to present the most convincing argument. Success must be seen within the context of the time, without allowing the benefit of hindsight and the events which were to follow to paint an untrue portrait of James’s leadership.
One problem which James encountered after coming to the English throne was English xenophobia,
…show more content…
The English would have been content with Scotland being treated in much the same way as Wales or Ireland, however this was not acceptable in the minds of the Scottish people, nor James as he wanted a unified Britain. Jenny Wormald suggests that ‘visible hostility of his subjects led him increasingly to tone down the ‘British’ language which he employed so enthusiastically’ . This suggests that, whilst at the beginning of his reign James attempted to blatantly attempt to unite the kingdoms. An example of this would be “you [the English] are to be the husband, they [the Scots] the wife”. Whilst he intended for this to bring about a greater union, the image only served to make relations tenser. After this approach did not work he changed his tactics towards more covert methods of unification. By adapting his methods, it is clear that James was able to react to situations, making him an effective leader. Whilst true unification did not occur under James’s reign, his actions in regards to this still improved relations slightly. There were many factors which were both cohesive and divergent. The fact that Scotland and England were part of one continuous land
Summary Of Expression Of Power In A Medieveal Kingdom By Fiona Watson
772 Words | 4 PagesIn Fiona Watson’s essay, The Expression of Power in a Medieveal Kingdom: Thirteenth Century Scottish Castles, she discusses the importance of castles in thirteenth century Scotland. Overall Watson did an excellent job with this essay. There were many aspects of this argument to consider and she provided a sufficient amount of evidence for each piece. Watson does not disagree with any other author in particular and many even corroborate or elaborate on points of her argument. Watson argues that castles were crucial to the ruling of Scotland in the thirteenth century.
The Darien Scheme And Its Impact On Scotland's History
1474 Words | 6 PagesEngland, Wales, Ireland, and Scotland were joined together by a composite monarchy in 1603 by the Union of the Crowns. This means that they all had separate legal, political, religious,
Summary Of The Scottish Guardianship Of 1286-1306 By Norman Reid
919 Words | 4 PagesIn his article, “The kingless kingdom: the Scottish guardianship of 1286-1306,” Norman Reid argues that Scotland remained strong in the face of difficult times without a king by introducing the community of the realm. He states throughout that this guardianship was effective in governing Scotland and upheld the dignity of the kingdom. This essay will summarise and evaluate his case arguing that it is clear, well evidenced and, therefore, convincing. Reid begins by setting out his points of discussion in the article, indicating that it will only focus on certain periods of time. This will be between the death of Alexander III in 1286 to Edward
Harold Godwinson Dbq
1370 Words | 6 PagesJanuary 1066 was a time of chaos for medieval England. There were three people claiming the throne for themselves, and the result changed Europe forever. There was Harold Godwinson, the most powerful noble in England, who claimed that the king had promised to him the throne at the last minute, as he lay dying. There was William, Duke of Normandy, whom Edward had been friends with since they were children. Lastly, there was Harald Hadraada, a Norwegian noble who was given a claim to the English throne by King Magnus of Norway.
To What Extent Was Henry Vii Successfully Established Royal Authority By 1487
891 Words | 4 Pages‘Henry VII successfully established his royal authority by 1487’ I think that royal authority means that the king would have had an heir to carry on his line and his opposition has been dealt with to a suitable extent. By 1487, Henry had spent two years on the throne after defeating Richard III at the Battle of Bosworth, and within those years, I believe that Henry VII had successfully established his royal authority by 1487. However, there are arguments that suggest Henry did not successfully establish his royal authority by 1487.
Was William A Good King
321 Words | 2 PagesWilliam was a good king. I strongly believe that William was a good king, mainly because he had won many wars for his nation and had given them pride and land to live,work on and rule. Even though that he had raised the taxes really often it was for a good cause, like buy metals and other building material for military purposes or just for building houses for the serfs and their landowners. William was in his time,winning all his wars and bring fame upon his name. He was a good leader and protector for his people because all the invasions that were held in his domain he had successfully held them of and won.
Consolidation Of Royal Authority: Due To Henry VII
1545 Words | 7 Pages‘The consolidation of royal authority, in the years 1487-1509, was due to Henry VII’s control over the nobility.’ Explain why you agree or disagree with this view. It can be argued to a certain extent that the consolidation of royal authority for Henry VII, in the years 1487-1509, was a result of control over the nobility. The challenge lied in the ability to decrease their power without alienating them whilst removing their position of threat. However, there were other contributory factors in Henry’s consolidation of his royal authority, such as his diplomatic skills in dealing with foreign powers and the indispensable use of royal finances.
Comparing King James I And Sir Walter Raleigh
216 Words | 1 PagesKing James I, Queen Elizabeth, General Sir Edward Coke, and Sir Walter Raleigh are all the characters. They each have their own story and exposition that they need to find out if Sir Walter Raleigh is guilty for treason on his country. Raleigh is jealous of King James for all his wealth and honor. Raleigh wanted attention and that’s why he tried to kill King James I more than once. I found out that Sir Walter Raleigh tried and plotted to kill.
Narrative Essay On Immigration To College
639 Words | 3 PagesJames says it was extremely difficult to learn an entirely new language and culture as late in life as he was. He had to put a large amount of effort into it, but now he is able to use English in his everyday life, and when he is presented with something new, he knows exactly how to work hard to get through
Assess The Reasons For The Breakdown Of The Personal Rule
1220 Words | 5 PagesEssay - Breakdown of the Personal Rule – Assess the reasons for the breakdown of the personal rule. Charles’ personal rule was successful in the way that Charles managed to sustain himself and the country for eleven years. However, the enforcement of Laudianism on the Scottish people and the outbreak of war between the Scottish and the English ultimately led to the breakdown of the Personal Rule. Charles was out of touch with his people and lacked the right support and funding he needed to successfully win against the Scots. The failure of the Short Parliament worsened his situation and by arresting opposition, Charles alienated the people whose support he needed.
Absolute Monarchy In The 17th Century Essay
987 Words | 4 PagesShanti Gurung History 101 Final Exam Professor Montague 12/06/2015 1. As some 16th and 17th c. leaders sought to strengthen their control over both the legislative and administrative machinery of their respective kingdoms, others witnessed the destruction of absolutism as their principle governing philosophy. What obstacles did English royalty face in their effort to establish an absolute monarchy in the early decades of the 17th century? (Hint: Remember the tactics monarchs employed to achieve absolutism.)
Themes Of Before European Hegemony
1275 Words | 6 PagesThe main themes of Before European Hegemony revolve around the many aspects of trade, disastrous events, and the many pivotal events and advancements which changed the course of the many rival nations within the era preceding total European dominance. Before European hegemony is a very thorough book, providing insights into the inner workings of several empires in the thirteenth century. The theme of missteps and misfortune among these earlier nations enables Abu-Lughod’s idea of European dominance with the thirteenth century to be solidified and supplemented with validity, with Abu-Lughod providing a flowing narrative of historical events which permitted Europe to take its place as . Abu-Lughod investigations and observations into the economics
What Was The Overall Impact Of The Hyksos
1381 Words | 6 PagesThe overall effect of the Hyksos habitation of the Egyptian lands in the development of Egyptian culture, traditions and military technology, was significant to the impression Egypt has made on world history. However from the perspective of the Egyptian kings in Thebes, Egypt was the victim of Hyksos subjugation. Therefore, the Hyksos were expelled from Egyptian territory through the ‘Wars of Liberation’ which resulted in progression in the roles of queens and foreign policy and also shaped religion and kingship. These effects continued to the death of Thutmose IV. This essay will analyse the positive and negative impacts of the Hyksos across a number of industries and the short term and long term effect of the expulsion of the Hyksos.
Bede Christian Unity
724 Words | 3 PagesIn Bede’s Ecclesiastical History of the English People he writes zealously about the mistakes and trumpets of past rulers; about Christianity and two characteristics that it made obtainable: peace and unity. Bede finished writing in 731 and he dedicates the writing to King Ceolwulf with an underlying notion of moral instruction for everyday life, and guidelines to take towards being a righteous ruler. Bede showed the progression and importance of Christian unity throughout his History. The middle decades of the seventh century were violent, there was the constant threat of war from outside nations and rulers did not want infighting.
Why Was The 1791 Constitution Important
209 Words | 1 PagesOne of them was to take power from the king and give it to the people, but this goal was not entirely met. Since only
More about How Successful Was James VI & I In Dealing With The Problems Of Multiple Kingdoms
Summary Of Expression Of Power In A Medieveal Kingdom By Fiona Watson
772 Words | 4 PagesThe Darien Scheme And Its Impact On Scotland's History
1474 Words | 6 PagesSummary Of The Scottish Guardianship Of 1286-1306 By Norman Reid
919 Words | 4 PagesHarold Godwinson Dbq
1370 Words | 6 PagesTo What Extent Was Henry Vii Successfully Established Royal Authority By 1487
891 Words | 4 PagesWas William A Good King
321 Words | 2 PagesConsolidation Of Royal Authority: Due To Henry VII
1545 Words | 7 PagesComparing King James I And Sir Walter Raleigh
216 Words | 1 PagesNarrative Essay On Immigration To College
639 Words | 3 PagesAssess The Reasons For The Breakdown Of The Personal Rule
1220 Words | 5 PagesAbsolute Monarchy In The 17th Century Essay
987 Words | 4 PagesThemes Of Before European Hegemony
1275 Words | 6 PagesWhat Was The Overall Impact Of The Hyksos
1381 Words | 6 PagesBede Christian Unity
724 Words | 3 PagesWhy Was The 1791 Constitution Important
209 Words | 1 Pages