6) How was Caesar able to become dictator for life? How did his actions lead to his assassination? What did the conspirators hope to gain by killing a popular leader? Caesar was able to become dictator for life in Rome heavily due to his ability to build a strong and power military. With an army that had great size and power it made it possible for him to conquer and expanded his empire. At control of one of the most power army and largest empire known to man at that time, Caesar could rule largely by fear and tactical control over aspects of life such as government, trade, politics, and society. In much of Greek and/or Roman culture and society during ancient times respect, popularity, and fame was judge by a man military experiences and
Caesar was a great military leader, he was a man of strength, and he conquered all of Rome. Caesar was not afraid to take charge to take Rome high and make them more powerful. If he had to Caesar would kill anyone that stood in his way of making Rome more powerful. “Kill everyone inside” “without hesitation, his men, swords drown, burst inside the bar, and soon the street was quiet.”
Upon becoming dictator in ?? BC, Caesar had various powers and honours bestowed upon him, including life consulship, and imperium (source 12). Suetonius claims that as a ‘mere mortal’, Caesar should have refused these powers (source 12). Although, this stance most probably represents the adverse views from primary sources, such as Cicero, Suetonius would have based his authorship on. Furthermore, beholding these authorities was crucial for Caesar to implement the measures Rome required to achieve stability.
He fought many battles for 8 years all to better his country. When he went to war, all he had on his mind was to expand Rome. He didn't think about what people were going through at home. He also didn't think that his friends would betray him when he returned. Caesars army fought big and small battles.
Julius Caesar was one of Rome’s most successful and outstanding leaders. The question of whether or not he deserved to die is very simple. No, Julius Caesar did not deserve to be assassinated for the good of Rome because he was the good of Rome. Politically, militaristically, and economically he benefited Rome. Did the conspirators kill Caesar for the good of Rome or for their own personal motives?
Matt Roer 5/18/15 Did Julius Caesar rule through power or authority during his political reign? During Caesar’s political reign, he ruled through authority because he was able to deliver the needs of the majority populares group while satisfying the optimates by building public works projects, creating reforms that benefitted foreigners and the populares, and conquering the land of other regions. Caesar convinced others that it was in their best interest to be ruled because he provided Romans and outsiders with opportunities to be financially successful. When Caesar first got into power, he decided to stack his supporters by doling out citizenship to people from regions where he used to live such as the Alps (B).
Another thing that played a key role in his success was the fact that senators had no real way of opposing him. The senators had no military power, Augustus having it all to himself. That leads to the question of how did Augustus manage the entire might of the Roman army? The first thing that he did was reduce the number of soldiers from 500,000 to 300,000. This allowed him to root out legionaries who might betray him, as well as have fewer troops likely to cause a
He is considered to be the greatest leader of all time, but he only ruled for a short period of time. In 45 BC, Julius won the title of dictator of life, and it led into a fight
He was a statesman, Roman general, counsel, and a notable author of Latin Prose. He played a significant role that leads to the collapse of the Roman Republic and the rise of the Roman Empire. By age 31, Caesar had fought in several wars and was able to conquer new land with his army at his grasp and command. Caesar made political alliances that helped him rise to power and become a dictator in the Roman world in 48 BC. When Julius Caesar started to acquire more control, many of the senators feared he was an ambitious and a dangerous man.
According to Document C, he had nobility and warlike achievements. However Suetonius expressed his opinion that Caesar “did not surpass, the greatest of men.” While Caesar lead, mostly everyone gladly followed and
By dismantling his armies and by granting broad absolutions to his adversaries, Caesar gained more and more political clout. This resulted in his appointed, in 45 BC, as dictator for a period of 10 years. Within the next one year, Caesar had accepted to be appointed dictator for life. This marked the beginning of the end of the Republic and the ushering in of a new era in which Roman rulers would govern with absolute power and without any term limit. As Bishop observes, this led to a multiple political quandary for the Roman Republic.
He increased how many rights the common allied citizen had. He also granted full citizenship to all of the teachers and doctors in Rome that did not already have it. Although it can appear as if Caesar wanted to be King, this was not the case. The reason he passed these laws was to grow Rome. Growing Rome would not only grow the amount of people in the Roman army it would also help the Roman economy because when there are more people buying items, there are more people selling the items, thus adding jobs to Rome, thus lowering the unemployment rate.
The tyranny of Julius Caesar started when he was appointed special commander by the Senate. They did not know at the time, but this was a big mistake because such position would only lead to his conquering of Rome. Julius Caesar was a dictator in the Roman Republic who not only broke constitutional laws but also disregarded Roman morals. He saw a broken system and thought that the only way to fix what the Republic had done to the people of Rome was to rule himself. He was popularis (Frankforter, pg. 148) in the pursuit of freedom for the poor.
This paper will show you how Julius Caesar became the man he was and the pros and cons of his leadership. Before Caesar’s monarchy, he was a successful leader of armies. His victories in the Gallic wars only heightened his want for power. By 51 B.C. Julius’ ability to run a military was incomparable, which alone jeopardized Pompey’s leading. Thus, in 50 B.C. Pompey ordered Caesar to disband his army, step down from his military command, and return to Rome.
He put his self-interests aside, and placed the betterment of Rome before everything else. After becoming the Dictator for life, Caesar defeated his remaining enemies. He then gave his past enemies government positions in order to preserve peace. In this way, he attempted to preserve the ideal that Romans do not kill Romans to the best of his ability. He also allowed defeated foreigners to become citizens of Rome.
This proved his worthiness to being ruler by justifying his abilities to provide for and protect his empire. Since the Romans did not like that title of king, “he received the title Augustus by decree of the senate.” During his reign, Caesar accomplish countless things, which is why he is still talked highly about to this day. He repaired the conduits of aqueducts, dozens of temples, and completed the Julian forum and the basilica. He did these things because, like Qin, he loved and truly cared about his empire and wanted to see it flourish and restored; not broken and destroyed.