The Cherokee was were the last to move.
Furthermore, the Cherokee was only treating the Americans the way that the Americans were treating them first. hb
Has the Americans held a grudge against the Cherokee for that long? Vm
The reasons that it was justified, was the fact it got passed by congress.
The Indian removal act of 1830 was justified and the Cherokees should've moved because they did horrible things to people, were given better land, and was given freedom. Vl
Scalping and burning people is a gruesome thing to do. Kl
The Cherokee which is a Native American tribe, is living in Georgia, which is under U.S. law. ty
The first being that the Cherokee has harmed the Americans in the past. kk
Also America can’t be trusted, when
…show more content…
. . hb
Also there were a lot of controversy with the americans and the indians. mjm
The Indians didn’t want to move, had their land taken away, and wasn’t seen as equals are perfect reasons why this act was not justified kn
The only tribe unwilling to pack up their lives and restart were the Cherokee tribe. Kn
Maybe they were just looking out for their tribe and was trying to take advantage. jt If the Cherokee tribe do in fact move off their land, there is a lot of benefits that come with it in large amounts. sgt
Verb Tense
The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was justified because they killed, signed a treaty, and getting received extra land plus money. Ry
Many Georgians still had hatred and anger towards the Cherokee tribe because of past events that have occurred. ca
Initially, the reason why the Removal Act was not justified is not everyone signed the treaty. Only some of the chiefs signed the treaty of Etocha. Jak
The Americans did officially buy the land from the French, but the Cherokee was still there first it was just a matter of knowing how to claim land.
…show more content…
Jd
The final reason the Indian Removal Act was justified is that the Cherokee were given a great deal. Kl
They were given options to stay, and if the Indians don’t like it, they can leave. Lf
Cherokees killed people, be given free land and money with better resources, and they would be able to have freedom without having to follow the law since the Indian territory is not part of America. Vl
Based on these reasons, the Indian Removal Act was right because if it didn’t happen, the world wouldn't be what it was today. lk
The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was not justified because the Cherokee are getting kicked out of their homelands, the Cherokees were treated poorly, and only a few chiefs signed the contract. Gf
Even though the U.S. had tried to grant them lots of land and money, the Native Americans were just too smart to be fooled again with a treaty they know the U.S. would soon break.
There were pros and cons dealing with the Indian Removal Act of 1830, but it was not justified due to the Cherokee not wanting to move, the Americans taking over the land, and the Americans aren't seeing the Cherokee as equals.
So down below this will explain in depth why the indian removal act of 1812 is not justified Well, for starters we actually killed them using muskets and swords killing the men who tried to stop them. as well as we killed them with diseases that we had and we starved them because we killed animals for sport and we introduced new animals to the ecosystem. and intern were killing their way of life now they may have killed some of us but that is like saying a burglar runs into your house kills your family and then is trying to kill you.
Andrew Jackson and Congress passed the Indian Removal Act in 1830. The Indian Removal authorized the relocation of Native Americans from the lands East of the Mississippi River and to the west. The plan was finished by moving the Native Americans to what is now Oklahoma. The Indian Removal Act was meant to support the expansion of the United States without interference by moving the Natives out of the way. The Indian removal act was rationalized by the self-serving concept of manifest destiny, the belief that the expansion of the United States from the Atlantic to the Pacific Ocean was divinely ordained and inevitable, was used to justify the eviction of Native Americans from their native homelands.
Indian Removal policy The Indian removal act is the act called for the government to negotiate treaties that would make the Native Americans to relocate west. Andrew Jackson had supported a law of moving all the Native Americans to the West of the Mississippi. Andrew Jackson thought that the government had the right to regulate where Native Americans Were allowed to live. To solve this problem Andrew Jackson asked the Congress to make a Law that would make Native Americans either move west or to submit to state laws.(Jackson's Removal Policy) Andrew Jackson grew up really hating the Indians and grew up having the skull of Indians.
President Jackson promised the Indians horses and shelter but he did not give them anything. Indian removal act was not justified because President Jackson was not being a good leader, they Cherokee Indians were there first and claimed their land before the white settlers came, lastly the Indian Removal was very cruel and
Do you like getting kicked out after working hard and establishing a great community. On May 28, 1830 Andrew Jackson signed the Indian Removal Act. This act states that all the indians will have to move from their land that they had first into unknown land that is supposedly a huge hunk of the Louisiana just for them with fertile soil and a water source. The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was terrible and unjustified; indians had already build up an amazing society, they were there first, and the americans have already messed with the indians. For starters, the Indians have built up a respectable town.
The authors of each article tackle the daunting task of representing the Indian Removal Act, the Trail of Tears, and president Andrew Jacksons approach, appropriately while also including their own personal opinions. They also must back up their points with fact and reason. Each author has a unique opinion compared to the others, and when read all together, provide a better understanding from multiple sides and sources. The question the authors debate is whether Andrew Jackson was justified in his removal of Native Americans by use of the Indian Removal Act of 1830. Was he protecting the safety of the Native Americans by moving them, or was he only progressing the agenda of the white man?
The Act led to an array of legal and moral arguments for and against the need to relocate the Indians westward from the agriculturally productive lands of the Mississippi in Georgia and parts of Alabama. This paper compares and contrasts the major arguments for and against the
By far, the Indian Removal Act is a very barbarous thing to put our fellow Native Americans through. To begin with, removal of the indians is a very bribing and forceful action. The fact that we would all take the measures to force them off of their land is uncalled for, especially since it is land of their own. We cannot just bribe and trick the tribes for the comfort of ourselves, all stated in Document 6, Senator Peleg Sprague. In Document 5, Theodore Frelinghuysen, Frelinghuysen’s speech mentions how removal of the tribes would involve, very violent actions and crowded acres as they will be forced onto lands west of the Mississippi.
A Shameful Part of American History The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was America’s first attempt to legally remove Native Americans from their land. This primary source was created by the Senate and House of Representatives, and it was backed by President Andrew Jackson. Passed on May 28th, the act allowed the for the relocation of Natives west of the Mississippi River. This order was a result of Manifest Destiny which was the belief that it was the United State’s God-given right to expand westward.
Would you remove an abundance of Indians from their homes for money? That is what the Indian Removal Act did. Hundreds of Native Americans were taken from their homes. Andrew Jackson and John Ross had a debate on if they should get rid of the Indian Removal Act or if they should keep it. The Indian Removal Act was a step in the right direction.
After the U.S Constitution was ratified on the 27 of June 1788, American governors swore oath to democracy, equality and liberty. The idea of democracy has constantly been ignored throughout American history. At the very beginning of the new nation, the presidents were not elected by the people but rather by legislatures, distancing itself from the ideal method of democracy where the power belonged to the people. It was only gradually throughout the presidential elections that each state’s people started voting directly. Andrew Jackson is one of the American presidents whose actions are still debated on today.
On May 28, 1830, President Jackson signed the Indian Removal Act. Native Americans who didn’t want to relocate would become citizens of their home state. The Indian Removal Act separated Indians from immediate contact with settlements of whites. free them from the power of the States; enable them to pursue happiness in their own way and under their own rude institutions.
The Indian Removal Act was signed in 1830 by President Andrew Jackson to remove the Cherokee Indians from their homes and force them to settle west of the Mississippi River. The act was passed in hopes to gain agrarian land that would replenish the cotton industry which had plummeted after the Panic of 1819. Andrew Jackson believed that effectively forcing the Cherokees to become more civilized and to christianize them would be beneficial to them. Therefore, he thought the journey westward was necessary. In late 1838, the Cherokees were removed from their homes and forced into a brutal journey westward in the bitter cold.
The real intentions behind the Indian removal were due to the Indians territory was known as a black belt, a favorable soil and climate, which the American prosperity and economy were relying in the commercialization and textile industrialization of cotton. (270). All in all, Jackson’s administration had the intention in expand the territory by forcing the “Five Civilized Tribes” to increase the cotton commercialization and textile industrialization in favor of the American economy. On the other hand, many white settlers from the North and the leaders of the “Five Civilized Tribes” oppose the Indian Removal Act, fearing what they would found in the new land to survive.
On July 17, 1830, the Cherokee nation published an appeal to all of the American people. United States government paid little thought to the Native Americans’ previous letters of their concerns. It came to the point where they turned to the everyday people to help them. They were desperate. Their withdrawal of their homeland was being caused by Andrew Jackson signing the Indian Removal Act into law on May 28, 1830.