Historian as a Citizen written by noted political science Professor Howard Zinn , regarding historian 's views of human behavior. The passage reminds the reader to critique their perceptions of history and politics. Making the compelling argument that the position of the historian keeps evolving with the times and sociopolitical landscape. Ultimately , the proper role of the historian is to understand how history affects the present. Zinn starts off by saying " Traditionally , he is passive observer, one who looks for sequential patterns in the past as a guide to the future, or else describes the historical events as unique and disorderly- but without participating himself in attempts to change pattern or tidy the disorder" (Zinn 43). The "he" in the passage is in reference to historians as a whole. Zinn is saying that generally a historian must merely be an onlooker and facilitate. They must understand how the past is a basis for current events. Zinn goes onto say "For historians, there is an additional trap: The more we work on the data of the past the more weighted the past seems" (Zinn …show more content…
Additionally the readers are shown the "us vs them" mentality of human nature. No matter the situation we always see ourselves as the good guys, or the victim. An example of this that Zinn uses is the U.S 's views of the Soviet Union, the S.U. regime is regarded as tyrannical. But we must analyze what parts of our government are oppressive as well. By humanizing ourselves as the good ones we can justify truly horrifying acts. In this case Zinn uses The Vietnam War, an act of unnecessary violence that the U.S has committed. Evil isn 't exactly specific to one group of people, anyone and everyone has the potential to be cruel. There is a choice to be made of whether we will succumb to corrupt behavior or not. We are always quick to condemn other 's acts of evil, but defend the behavior of our government, people, or
Regarding this Haskell states that objectivity in the present “has precious little to do with neutrality, but a great deal to do with a cultural orientation,” and continues by stating that if objectivity were rooted in neutrality there, in his opinion, would be nothing to defend (Haskell, 131). While Haskell seems to feel that there are some bias viewpoints to objectivity and the history that historians write, Novick believes quite the opposite. Novick suggests that he believes that historians can write history itself from an unbiased opinion. He presents this by writing, “that historians, as historians, must purge themselves of external loyalties,” with this established Novick finishes by stating that historians ultimately, provide their loyalty to “the objective historical truth” (Novick, 2). Haskell continues to disagree with Novick’s view of objectivity as he defines the term as stating that it is useless to be neutral, and all historians write from the point of
Howard Zinn’s A People’s History of the United States offers great educational value, not only on history itself but on how history is typically taught, how it should be instead portrayed, and the arguments that arise as a result. Such a controversial book can bring up many different opinions and analyses. Zinn’s purpose in writing A People’s History of the United States was to share history from a perspective different from that which we typically read. “Too much history, he contends, is written ‘from the point of view of governments, conquerors, diplomats, leaders.’ His People’s History, by way of contrast, sides with the losers, the downtrodden, the underdog” (Zinn XVI).
Fallen Angels Have you a reader ever wondered about the realistic depiction of war: how the war is romanticized and how it can be an awful place to be? The author Walter Dean Myers shows us the depiction of the war in Vietnam the main character in the book Richard Perry a young boy from Harlem being thrown into the war because of his life at home and doesn't want to really deal with people. The book Fallen Angels is a realistic depiction of war. The book shows us some untimely deaths, graphic violence and the main protagonist inner thoughts and doubts. Through the novel Fallen Angels the depiction of war is shoved into the main characters face with graphic violence untimely deaths that occur and the
Courtney Lachney The Progressive Era Critical Thinking Activity Essay Rubric History shows how humans grew. It shows where we all originated from and how we made up our laws and such. History has brought about a lot of change. There are so many different ideals and beliefs that originated in the past. There were so many wars and killing sover things that were sometimes for the worst.
There was something pulling me back” (Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon, 2000.) The citizen described by Aristotle is a member of the polis. The polis is particularly important in defining the citizen because it is what allows self-sufficiency. This self-sufficiency creates an artificial equality that causes people to do things for the public good.
Then by the same sign when a man kills ten others, his crime will be ten times greater and should be punished by death ten times…. Crime such as attacking another country is applauded as a righteous act, can this be said to be knowing the difference between righteousness and unrighteousness? (20)” this quote originated from Judy Grahn’s book, “blood, bread, and roses” and it is notable to mention for its truthfulness that people place blame to everything else unless notably acceptable in society. When it came down to it Ehrenreich had no qualm to point out humanities flaws and even mentions that it shows humans true nature. Ehrenreich brings a good thought to the table, “Which are we: beasts because we make war, or angels because we so often seek to make it into something
In the journal article “ Andrew Jackson versus the Historians”, author Charles G. Sellers explained the various interpretations of Jackson, from the viewpoint of Whig historians and Progressive Historians. These interpretations were based on the policies of Jackson. The Whig historians viewed the former president in a negative way. They considered him arrogant, ignorant, and not fit for being president. Sellers pointed out that it was not just because of “Jackson’s personality…nor was it the general policies he pursued as president”
Steven Hahn’s lecture holds several great points, but his introduction resonates with me when he explains that it is nearly impossible to write a history of one state from a different place of origin. Hahn explains that the corresponding viewpoints would be too great and in order to fully understand the history of one place, you need to have some sort of connection to the place itself. Such a connection forms when places construct a history that brings citizens together, either through public celebrations or remembrance of past events specific to that state. This allows citizens who experience these events to hold a deeper connection and understanding of their home state, and thus write a comprehensive and in-depth history on said state. Non-citizens would not have those same experiences, so they would not be able to write such a full history since they lack the fundamental understanding that citizens hold.
On the day that the United States of America declared to became independent, everything has changed since then. That day was one of the most significant historical events in the US history line; people of US began to have a completely different life. Thus the difference of political situation after the declaration of independence, US began to refresh everything that was necessary, and the law took the priority. Howard Zinn and Anthony Arnove both were a writer, editor, and social activist that was best known for the anti-war movement.
History is a novel idea that has been a continuous idea throughout our time in class. We have gone over what history means to us, the students; as well as the authors and filmmakers we have studied. For me, before this class, History merely meant what we
However, I think it is important for historians to try to get as close as possible to the perspective that people in said time and place in history observed. We see
In contrast, “The Genocidal Killer in the Mirror” focuses on the history of mass death goes back as far as 500 years ago. Sartwell cited some historical events that happened, including the Cambodian Killing Field, Nazi Holocaust, Cultural Revolution, Belgians vs. Congolese and the African Slave Trade. In his article, Sartwell assumes that authority especially hierarchies is the most “evil” thing in our society. Sartwell also states that all humans are "evil” (Sartwell), but then ask if evil is something that is learned behavior through institutional means, for example through media and bureaucracy.
Throughout the novel, dehumanization has contributed to and resulted in large amounts of conflict. People’s positivity is stripped away leaving only negativity. Society then finds a way to cope with their unhappiness, usually resulting in an increase in negative effects. One example of how censorship created negative conflicts includes, “A carful of children… had seen a man, a very extraordinary sight, a man strolling, a rarity… They would have killed me…
The word terrorist attaches to every part of this essay so that the reader will view them in a negative light and become persuaded to believe that torture is a necessary action to perform on them (terrorists). The word innocent also attaches to every part of this essay to make the reader become a defender to those “who never asked to be in danger”. This word (innocent) also connects with the word baby because whenever a person thinks about a baby the adjectives that are associated with it are helpless, unknowing, innocent, and unaware to the danger that surrounds them. This connection is made because the one thing any (moral) human being would care about over their own self would be their children. Levin uses this connection so that it is very relatable to the audience’s everyday life and the emotional appeal is able to have more influence since it is a scenario any