There is a novel societal axiom - the more educated one becomes, the higher one’s chances of being more successful in life. For many families acquiring education for their children is believed to be the foundation of helping them advance their socio-economic status (ref 1). In the western societies where the mean age keeps increasing, due to an ageing of population, the educational sector has received diminishing financial support from the government (reference 2 about the fact that education is becoming more expensive,). This implies that universities are losing the subsidies they once received, and have to respond by raising the tuition fees. Increased tuition fees for students suggest that the opportunity cost - what one must give up in …show more content…
Individuals and society, derive benefits from investing in people and education becomes the prime human capital investment ( ref Scott R. Sweetland). Three hypotheses will be formed: two on the individual and one on the national level. The relationship to be tested is between the education obtained and income earned. This relationship has been observed and studied by economists such as T. Dee, R. Layard, C. Harmon and G. Psacharopoulos. According to the latter, evidence suggests a causal positive effect of education on income (GEORGE PSACHAROPOULOS, 1994). Thus the following hypothesis can be …show more content…
In the long run, a one year increase in education was found to lead to an average of 8% decrease in mortality of the male population that is below 50 years old (Kunst & Mackenbach, 1994). This is why the second hypothesis will test for a causal effect of different levels of education on the mortality rate on the individual level.
Hypothesis 2: There is significant negative causal effect of the level of education on the mortality rate on the individual level, in the period of 1993 to 2010, in the Netherlands at a 5% significance level.
These statements may not be valid on the aggregate level. Over the last century life expectancy and the level education have been increasing, causing debates and research to find a correlation between these variables (Cochrane, O'Hara, & Leslie, 1980). This is problematic since simultaneous causality could potentially have influence in this setting. Human capital theory could explain this: life expectancy could possibly increase the returns to education in the aggregate level (ref scott sweetland). According to the available data, the final hypothesis will test for a causal effect of life expectancy on the percentage of males who completed higher
Throughout his article, he speaks about education. “The Upside of Income Inequality” makes two basic points to support the conclusion noted in the title of the article. First, the correlations between educationa and income; that the value of a college education has risen as income inequality has risen. And second, that therefore the rate of Americans who attend college has increased. The article provides multiple graphs that correlate different principles with education and income.
According to Henry Bienen, president emeritus of Northwestern University speaking as a panel member in an Intelligence Squared debate “Too Many Kids Go To College, “. . . more years of school, post-secondary, are positively correlated with earnings over one’s lifetime, and also correlated with lower rates of unemployment and shorter duration being unemployed when a higher degree is obtained. ” (8) The American middle class is rapidly shrinking. More and more people are dependent on their own earnings in order to just be able to meet their expenses and survive. They have no family that is able to support them if they don’t make it on their own.
In “The upside of income inequality” – Becker and Murphy, they mention the demand for education and skilled people is growing. The proportion of people going to a higher education is found among all racial and ethnic group (pg.585). As of figure 4 graph, the proportion of men and women ages 20 to 25 who are attending college has risen about half in a 40 year of tracking. They stress the important of education for all types of people that with higher level of education there is more opportunity. Therefore, in article “American remains the world’s beacon of Success” – Tim Roemer.
The Importance of College Many people wonder what they want to do after high school graduation. There are many options to go with such as, military, college, or even taking a break for a little bit. Out of all of these though, going to college would be one of the best ideas because it can help a person a lot in their life. College is also a great opportunity to help get the things someone needs in their life. A college education is valuable because one can have better wealth, a better education, and can give one a healthier lifestyle.
Education is widely regarded as a key factor in the economic and social development of a country. With the extremely rapid development of the society, in order to enhance their competitiveness, increasing young people choose to accept higher education. Yet, there are different attitudes about whether students should pay or not. Some people regard education as a basic right, which should therefore be provided free, while others think the individual student should have to shoulder some of the costs of his or her education. According to Matt Bruenig’s Dissent article “The Case Against Free College: Free college is paid for by the working class people who don 't attend”, Bruenig against the free college because it seems more fair and benefit to
College has had an increase in the amount of attention received over the course of a few decades as the debate on whether or not to go to college has waged on. Amongst the tidal wave of college advocates is Anthony Carnevale; he argues that people should go to college as it provides a substantially higher chance of being able to sustain themselves with higher income over the course of their lives. (par. 3) There is strong opposition to the societal preaching by Stephanie Owen and Isabelle Sawhill who claim that a college education only provides a higher income in certain fields of study.
Going to college for many students is just a normal part of life. It is what will enable them to get an education that eventually will lead to get a well-paid job and the resources and the status to live a comfortable life. But for college professor, Andrew Delbanco, the American college has a higher purpose. In the article “College at Risk”, Delbanco states that colleges should be promoting critical thinking among students, through knowledge of the past and the interaction with each other; as well as, help them discover their talents and passions and figure out what they want to do in life. This type of education is called liberal arts and for Delbanco, it represents the ideal education.
There is many people that go to college, but because of the cost they don't get through college. The elevated costs of college cause not only students to struggle paying for college, but also to struggle financially paying for college when they are done. In many cases, after graduating, young adults who don’t find a job will become poorer, increasing the gap between the rich and the
Many of my friends are studying different courses such as; Physician Assistant, Pharmacy, and Nursing. They all want to achieve their goals and dreams. They also claim that “As Figure 4 shows, the proportion of men and women ages 20 to 25 who attended college jumped by about half over the past poor ears, tracking the rise in the wage premium. When returns fell in the 1970s, the fraction going on to college declined. The rise in returns since 1980 has been accompanied by a significant rise
Delbanco explains how students have changed their reasons for attending a college when he states, “...yet on the assumption that immersing themselves in learning for the sheer joy of it, with the aim of deepening their understanding of culture, nature, and, ultimately, themselves, is a vain indulgence” (222). Secondary education has become too expensive for learning to be an indulgence. Students only go to college to get a degree in order to gain a high paying career. Davidson explains how dire the situation with low paying job is by saying how the process should work, “Only through productivity growth can the average quality of human life improve” (339). Unfortunately, the productivity growth only leaves a bigger pay gap.
Attending college is an important life choice everyone should make. Stephanie Owen and Isabel Sawhill, the authors of Should Everyone Go to College?, explore that “…the median earnings of about $30,000 for 25-34-year old high school graduates working full-time in 2010, this implies that a year in college increases earnings by $3,000, and four years increases them by $12,000” (They Say/I Say pg.209/para. 3). In the Owen and Sawhill article they provide information on the difference in a person’s salary with a high school diploma compared to a person’s salary with a one year certificate and a bachelor’s degree. Owen and Sawhill continues on to state that, “there are many non-monetary benefits of schooling that are harder to measure but no less important” (They Say/I Say pg.210/para.3). The authors used information gathered from research reports that they conducted to determine salary and/or wage earnings for an individual who attends one year of college versus four years of college.
Since tuition has risen 3 times higher the rate of inflation in the past 10 years, this increase a student’s chances of not being able to afford higher education and also gives them a better chance of accumulating debt post-graduation. Some people think that the college education they acquired did not fit the amount they paid for it, even if they pulled out loans or were an ideal candidate for a scholarship. This is a scary fact because higher education can determine if you thrive
From the time we start our careers as students in school, we are told that in order to gains success in life we must attend college. That after high school, college is no doubt the next step we should be taking. Yet, for most students that are not wealthy this goal is almost unattainable. If the majority of students can’t afford tuition, then why is the tuition rate so high? Its certainly not an accident.
The notion that education generates sufficient external benefits, either through higher levels of economic growth spillovers is examined and found lacking. Even under conditions of market failure, government failure is omnipresent and sufficiently. Through education provides positive externality and that university education needs to be subsided the government might not have enough money to pay for education which might also reduce the funds paid by the
In recent years, the number of people who have been attending university greatly increased, consequently, arguments have continued as to whether students should pay for this prerogative or not. With no doubts, everything has its two sides and the problem of whether the university fees should be paid by taxpayers or not is not an exception. Still, there are people who believe that authorities should take the responsibility for funding the university fees. However, others disagree and opine that it is solely the responsibility of students to pay for their higher education that is in a direct connection to their prospering future career and life in general. In this way, it is important to review both sides of this controversial question.