According to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, there are a little over 700 children abductions per day. Wouldn’t it be wonderful to live in a world where everyone was safe, and people were rendered harmless? Immediately you may think it is a no-brainer…and wonder why this hasn’t already been established! Although, with a closer look, you may reach a different opinion. Throughout this essay The Giver by Lois Lowry, and The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe by C.S. Lewis will be the primary source of my investigation into human choice. Human Choice has both positive and negative consequences. To eliminate evil one might think that you should eliminate human choice. However, with the abolition of human choice, you will also …show more content…
People are numb to emotion when people die, and look on it as a process of life that should not affect us. Lois Lowry wrote this in the Giver, “As he [Jonas] continued to watch, the newchild, no longer crying, moved his arms and legs in a jerking motion. Then he went limp. His head fell to the side, his eyes half open. Then he was still.” Later in the chapter Lowry added this, “He killed it! My father killed it! Jonas said to himself, stunned at what he was realizing. He continued to stare at the screen numbly.” The community of Sameness, decided that a lack of human choice would create a ‘perfect’ community. However, perfection cannot be achieved, because in the pursuit of perfection; there are costs that will eventually outweigh the benefits. We see this illustrated in the words of Lowry, “His father loaded the carton containing the body into the chute and gave it a shove. ‘Bye-bye, little guy,’ Jonas heard his father say before he left the room. Then the screen went blank.” Jonas’ father had no capacity to understand that human life is sacred and when it is ended; it is not to be taken lightly. With no ability to feel emotion, the little carton was shoved down the chute without a second
Erik Fisher, and Author Bauer, cracking up in the locker room, as if they were dying themselves, except only with laughter. But, when they come back out, into the real world, into the moment of silence. They for some reason, were pretending to be somber, pretending to care, but why. Why would someone ever laugh over a death, how could someone laugh over
The Jews had become so accustomed to seeing death that they could pass by it without feeling anything. “The dead remained in the yard… no one recieted Kaddish over them. Sons abandoned the remains of their fathers without a tear. ”(Wiesel 92) This shows that the Jews were unable to feel sorrow even after seeing their fathers lie deceased on the ground.
The theme power and corruption is explored in both ‘Hamlet’ and ‘The Lion King’. It is demonstrated that power can be used for the wrong reasons, and it results in families being torn apart. In Disney’s ‘The Lion King’, Scar the antagonist was denied from being king at birth, and therefore allowed the greed for power to override his personality. Jealousy was shown when Scar used Simba to cover up his murder of the king.
‘It is what he was told to do, and he know nothing else’” (144). This illustrates just how much Jonas’ father lacks knowledge and wisdom, to the point where he does not know if killing an innocent baby is morally wrong. This means that Jonas’ father as well as everyone in the community will never know what is really right or wrong, nor will they know what to believe. It matters because people in Jonas’ community might think killing is a normal action, or even worse, good.
The other reason in which natural evil operates to give humans their freedom is that it makes possible certain kinds of action towards it between which genets can choose (Swinburne, p.95). For instance, sicknesses provide humans chance to find the cure and help other patients in the future. If there is no sickness, this choice does not exist at all. It is a way in which we learn how to bring about good and evil. The natural evil allows us to perform at our best and interact with out fellows at the deepest level.
On the other hand, theists like Swinburne, believe that evil is necessary for important reasons such as that it helps us grow and improve. In this paper I will argue that the theist is right, because the good of the evil in this specific case on problems beyond one’s control, outweighs the bad that comes from it. I will begin by stating the objection the anti-theodicist gives for why it is wrong that there is a problem of evil. (<--fix) Regarding passive evil not caused by human action, the anti-theodicist claims that there is an issue with a creator, God, allowing a world to exist where evil things happen, which are not caused by human beings (180-181).
Today we live in a scientific era, a modern world, where everyday a new invention amazes us and changes the lives of common people in ways in which we couldn’t even have imagined. Technology has grown at an exponential rate ever since the industrial revolution and we know how every single piece of the human body operates, down to the atoms that it is composed of. And yet the common public refuses to let go of an age old misconception - that it is a single, tragic moment in a child’s life that triggers their transformation from good to evil. In his article, “Why Boys Become Vicious”, William Golding misinterprets fear and chaos as the direct cause of evil when it actually the neurological and genetic makeup of a child that proves to be the true culprit. However, Golding accurately pins the background of a child as one of the key causes of evil in children.
In the book,everyone has the same attribute’s but one twelve year old boy named Jonas. Throughout the novel,Jonas has suffer and has been misunderstood. Jonas opened his eyes to the reality of the community. This causes tears,anger,lonely’s,confused,unaware and misunderstanding. “He killed it my father killed it”,Jonas said to himself” (Lowry 188).
Wrong word, Jonas thought. Frightened meant that deep, sickening feeling of something terrible about to happen. “ Lois Lowry chose to end the novel when we expected her to tell us what happened to Gabriel and Jonas. The ending was quite unexpected and unpredictable. By using an open-ended plot the author makes the reader reflect on the possible endings of the story.
The movie, The Lion King, includes several different demonstrations of leadership theories. By following the story of a young lion, whose father is the king, and their “pride” or community, the film shows an array of different leadership approaches from two main leaders (Allers and Minkoff). The most prominent leaders in The Lion King are Mufasa, the king of the “pride lands” and the main character’s father, and Scar. Scar is Mufasa’s bitter and jealous brother that rules over the hyenas just outside of the “pride lands” (Allers and Minkoff). Between these two, very different leaders, the situational approach, the path-goal approach, and the transformational approach are all applied.
A lot of arguments have been known to prove or disprove the existence of God, and the Problem of Evil is one of them. The Problem of Evil argues that it is impossible to have God and evil existing in the same world. Due to ideal characteristics of God, evil should not have a chance to exist and make human suffer. In this essay, I will examine the argument for the Problem of Evil, a possible theodicy against the argument, and reply to the theodicy. First of all, to be clear, the Problem of Evil is an argument that shows that God cannot be either all- powerful, all-knowing, and/or all good.
The book and movie that I read is called The Lion, The Witch ,and The Wardrobe. It was written by C.S Lewis, and the movie was produced by Andrew Adamson. The book and the movie were about this family who had to move because of Air Raids. There were two brothers named Peter and Edmund and two sisters named Susan and Lucy. They stay in a profferer 's house.
Just remember that almost anything that you experience in the early stages of grief is normal—including feeling like you’re going crazy, feeling like you’re in a bad dream, or questioning your religious or spiritual beliefs. Shock and disbelief – Right after a loss, it can be hard to accept what happened. You may feel numb, have trouble believing that the loss really happened, or even deny the truth. If someone you love has died, you may keep expecting them to show up, even though you know they’re gone.
However, only 115 reported abductions represent cases in which strangers abduct and kill children, hold them for ransom, or take them with the intention to keep. It is very worrying that so many kidnappings happens in
That just leaves one question, why, and how do we cope with this feeling? To have this feeling shows the people are normal and that we as humans are able to show how we feel. Grieving is very important when you lose a loved one because it helps people get over the feeling of being empty, and it also helps people move on from the sadness that they are feeling. To begin with, we grieve because we loved. When people lose someone and they do not grieve that means that the did not love as much as they could have.