Throughout history, philosophers have been questioning about the human nature. Are humans originally good? Are we originally bad? Are humans born in a blank state, tabula rasa as John Lock referred to it? Many theories have been produced that try to explain the human behavior. Those theories can be categorized under two main ideologies: determinism, and existentialism. Determinism is the idea that humans do not have free-well, and that all their decisions are determined either by the nature of human species or by the nurturing humans receive from the environment. The first type of deterministic theories argue in favor of human nature; namely, humans are predetermined by their genetics and natural evolution to act in a certain way. These theories …show more content…
First, a flourishing economy can never exist without security and protection from a higher authority. Only a strong state with a strong military can stop the aggression of some humans on the rights of others. Jared Diamond in his famous book, Guns, Germs, and Steel, argues that the strong militaries with advanced weapons were among the main factors that enabled the Europeans to dominate most of the world during the imperial era. Moreover, military power will not only protect economies but will allow them to flourish either by violent or non-violent means. For example, the European imperial powers enriched their economies through the extraction of raw resources from the colonies and then selling them in the origin country and the colonies’ markets as well. A more specific example is the British East India Company that had its own army to help protect and market their goods in India. Second, military power comes before ideological power for two reasons. Unfamiliar ideologies have been suppressed and killed either by oppressive governments or by the common society that usually resist any change in the status quo. This has been the norm throughout history, and is still the norm in many countries today, until the last century that allowed a relative free sharing of ideas and opinions. Accordingly, most of today’s ideologies, including religions, would never have survived without the support of military power. Ideologies die if left in books, and they blossom only if there are enough people who have enough military power and are willing to sacrifice their lives for those ideas. In addition, this part of using direct force may be used to establish the foundation of the ideology only. According to Ibn Khaldun, people, consciously or unconsciously out of fear or out of glorification, usually tend to imitate and follow the
Determinism is a theory that all things in the world is governed by laws. This theory is based upon the materialist view of the body and mind. Materialists think that all things that exist in this world matter. We, humans, have mind or souls and desired interests are based upon actions. This principal argues that we have no moral responsibilities and choices.
How did the dominant countries of the world come to be dominant? Or, how did people living in the same time period, with crude and primitive technology come to overthrow other neighboring countries? Especially since these countries were inhabited by people with relatively the same intelligence levels as themselves. However, some historians would conclude that intelligence was, in fact, the main deciding factor for the overthrow of some countries. However, in this book, Jared Diamond tells how guns, germs, and steel are, in effect, the reasons for some cultures being superior over others.
While invention was only part of the story, empire was central. It enabled the accumulation of capital for rapid expansion and controlled markets, and it ensured a supply of cotton. Beckert argues that slavery and the expropriation of native lands was fueled by European capital and combined to feed raw materials relentlessly into Europe’s core industry. European capitalists and rulers altered global networks through multiple means. The muscle of armed trade enabled the creation of a complex, Eurocentric maritime trade web and the forging of a military-fiscal state allowed for the projection of power into the far-flung corners of the world.
Jared Diamond attempts to answer this question through his historical narrative on the rise of civilization presented in Guns, Germs, and Steel. By drawing from his personal experiences, Diamond offers an explanation for this situation by explaining how the geographical location of past societies determined their rate of technological and societal advancement, ultimately defining the amount of international power modern states possess today. Although Jared Diamond’s argument seems to successfully trace the source of inequality between states back to the fact that not all geographic regions have the same nor equal amount of resources available, his reasoning is not completely compelling.
To begin, human nature is claimed as a set of characteristics given to all humans, it is therefore declared essentially historical to the extent of being unchangeable. However, human development is something that is true to an individual and unique to solely himself through their decisions. It is in our human nature to be vulnerable to imperfection, such as nefarious actions. The philosophy of existentialism states that we are the creators of our own nature.
In The Diplomacy of Imperialism by William L. Langer, the depth of the economic force is discussed. The author states “But the economic side . . . must not be allowed to obscure the other factors. Psychologically speaking . . . evolutionary teaching [about the “survival of the fittest] was perhaps most crucial.”
The essay will, in essence inspect the determinism–free will problem. It will start with a basic introduction to the concept of determinism. Historical observations and interpretations about it will be outlined and criticised,
This chapter opens with the account of Susan Smith of South Carolina, and of Andrea Yates of Texas. In both cases, these women took the lives of their children. Smith strapped her two young sons into their car seats and drove her car into a lake. Yates drowned her five children in the family bath tub. Smith in particular paints a gruesome picture in my mind.
One of the biggest flaws of determinism is that it strips humans of their individualism and moral freedom. People aren’t who they are because of the choices they make, but the environments they’re from. This theory also discredits individual responsibility. A man who abuses his wife can simply claim he had no choice-- it’s due to his violent upbringing. Where does this end?
The Blank Slate and Paul Bloom’s Just Babies: The Origins of Good and Evil, this essay will analyze the opinions advanced by both sides of the theories. In
The notion of modern state started emerging in the sixteenth century and with the span of time, this idea of modern state became universal through conquest and overpowering. Modern state, i.e. the enriched and the precise form of absolutist state aspires for the pursuit of central power in the state and makes its way regularized for the national system of power to get implemented. The concept of modern state has been there since the Westphalia Peace Treaty in the mC17. But even before that peace treaty, the similar form of state was there in the form of imperialism and there existed the princely states which used to be governed by the imperial authorities. Now with the formation of modern state the other forms of power structures has become weak and has now been exhausted.
The second question with the problem with humans is “what are the innate predispositions of men?” (Becker, 1971, p. 116). The third question with the problem with humans is “what types of personality are most valued” (Becker, 1971, p. 116). The fourth question with the problem with humans is “what are the modes of relating to others” (Becker, 1971, p. 116).
For many years, a complex debate has raged on: how were we created? The two different sides of this argument have been the intelligent design theory and evolution. The intelligent design theory states that all living creatures were created by something or something. On the other hand, the theory of evolution states that complex creatures evolved from more simplistic creatures naturally over time.
Evolutionary Psychologists are making a mistake in supposing that modern human behavior can be explained by our evolutionary history. Although applying the evolutionary theory to the way we as humans act, there are still problems with the evolutionary theory. In this essay, I argue that (i) Humans do not solely act based on instinct like evolutionary history would suggest and (ii)not everyone’s behaviors are for reproductive success. I will start off this essay by explaining what evolutionary psychologists think human motives are ( Giving examples from famous Evolutionary Psychologist Darwin books that he has written about Evolutionary Theory). I will then present the two most cogent arguments against Darwin’s theory.