Human embryonic stem cells were known before a decade ago that they could be extremely adaptable and could be converted into any type of cell in the body (heart, liver, blood). Stem cell investigators in the year 1998 were able to develop human embryonic stem cells and started the new era called “regenerative medicine” where they can develop ways in which they can replace diseased and injured cells in bodies with serious illnesses. (3)
Stem cells have two characteristics that no other cells have. They can renew themselves by cell division and can differentiate into different cell types like those of bone and muscle. These cells are important towards a human’s health and development because they have a role in the maintenance of our organs and
…show more content…
The Embryonic stem cells are grown in laboratories from cells found in early embryos whereas tissue stem cells are found in our own bodies. The Induced pluripotent (reprogrammed) stem cells are similar to the embryonic but are made from adult specialized cells using a laboratory technique. (4) Stem cells may be pluripotent or multipotent. Stem cells that are pluripotent can give rise to any cell in the body other than those needed to support and develop a fetus in the womb whereas multipotent stem cells can only give rise to a small number of different cell types. …show more content…
Stem cells aren’t only able to stop a disease from proceeding, but it can also restore anything that was injured. To many people it sounds like a great thing but to some, they think it’s an inhumane thing to do. Having to destroy human embryos sounds like a huge problem to people who hold a religious viewpoint or hold moral issues as an important factor. So is stem cell research really a good thing or a bad thing?
References:
1. Bellomo, Michael. The Stem Cell Divide: The Facts, the Fiction, and the Fear Driving the Greatest Scientific, Political, and Religious Debate of Our Time. New York: American Management Association, 2006. Questia School. Web. 13 Sept. 2015.
2. "Britain Debates Taking Lead in Human Cloning." The Florida Times
Union. 23 Jan. 2001. Questia School. Web. 13 Sept. 2015.
3. Cohen, Cynthia B. Renewing the Stuff of Life: Stem Cells, Ethics, and
Public Policy. New York: Oxford UP, 2007. Questia School. Web. 13 Sept. 2015.
4. Cox, Claire. "Types of Stem Cells and Their Current Uses." EuroStemCell.
EuroStemCell, 17 Aug. 2012. Web. 13 Sept. 2015.
5. "Glimpse of Hope for the Blind Given Stem Cell Jab." Daily
The essay “Best Hope Lies in Privately Funded Stem Cell Research”, states the importance of stem cell research and the effects it can have on curing disease more effectively than any other method. Written by Sigrid Fry-Revere, PhD, director of bioethics studies at the Cato Institute; the author of the paper emphasizes the importance of funding programs for stem cell research on highlights the government holding out on funding due to ethical reasons. Revere claims that the government is threatening the private investing of stem cell research organizations and are trying to put a stop to production of research. This essay is targeted for people who are academic/bioethics orientated and the future of the world disease control and abolishment.
Though there have since become guidelines, for much of the first half century of cell research all projects were riddled with a lack of ethical treatment of the patients and the exploitation of them and their cells. Despite the gripes of the patients, especially those whom are mentioned by Skloot, they are largely ignored in favor of the money making giant that is the cell growing
Over the years, there have been many controversial issues surrounding medical research, but one of the most arguable topics of all time is the use of embryonic stem cells. Some individuals believe that extracting stem cells from unborn babies will be useful to create new medications or, in most cases, help regenerate damaged cells. Although, many people disagree with the process scientists use to obtain these stem cells. By continuing embryonic stem cell research, scientists are denying an unborn child the chance to live, they are not letting nature take its intended course, and they are not adhering to the religious or moral beliefs of many people.
Embryonic stem cell treatment has the potential to be very beneficial to our society. Nevertheless, many people oppose the use of embryonic stem cells due to the fact that they are extracted from human embryos. They believe that embryos are human life and should possess the same rights that humans do.
Embryonic Stem cell research is a controversial issue in America right now and has been for years. Personally when I first saw read about this topic I knew I was going to be against it because of my religious beliefs. However, after doing more research and reading more into it, I actually think we need to continue funding for this. I know many people would disagree with me but this could save millions of people from suffering every day.
The authors here compare Nazi's in the 1955 who would experiment on disabled children to stem cell scientists who use "human embryos or fetuses as objects or means of experimentation"(Lee & Schmaida, 2015, para.5). This comparison between Nazi's who are interested in improving the Nazi party and stem cell scientists looking find cures for diseases is unwarranted and displays the author's skewed opinion of fetal stem cells. The authors reach a breakdown in logic when they say that "second-trimester miscarriages are also an excellent sources of fetal tissue for transplantation. No clear scientific proof justifies using abortion-derived or human embryonic tissues"(Lee & Schmainda, 2015, para.4). These two sentences contradict each other and unveils more depth to the authors' distaste for fetal stem cells.
People who want to protect the lives of infants say we should not practice embryonic stem research on embryos because they believe it is unethical and they care about the lives of children. Since their beliefs and values differ from those of the religious beliefs and philosophical thinkers, they tend to have different reasons, and they tend to cite different evidence in support of their claim. For example, in “embryonic stem cell debate brings politics ethics to bench” Charles Marwick argues a principal claim in stark contrast to the position held by Glick. Whereas Glick said, “embryonic stem cell is ethical,” Marwick replies, “that embryonic stem cell is unethical.” And Marwick further supports his her principal claim with reasons that reflect his values and beliefs.
Embryonic stem cell transplants have been an ethical, social, and legal controversy since the first successful transplant of human stem cells in 1998. The controversy slowed down the pace of any advancements in the life saving technique. Stem cell transplant controversy falls into the same category as abortion and whether someone is pro-life or pro-choice because of the way the cells are derived from human embryos. The use embryonic stems cells have been saving lives since the late 90s, so the discontinuation of this research would be the greatest mistake ever made. Imagine a child sick with an aggressive cancer that is close to ending the child’s life.
On February 8, 1951 something incredible to the medical world was discovered, the HeLa cell. It was taken from Henrietta Lacks a patient who had a large tumor and shortly died of cancer after the finding of the large mass in her stomach. Yet, prior to her death on that day of February her physician without her consent took her cervical tissue and gave it to the researching finding that it kept doubling and growing in size making it ‘immortal’. Never had such a significant and powerful cells had been found before. The tissue has been used to stop diseases, HIV/AIDS, understand cancer, these cells have even been through space to see if it was safe for humans.
How would you feel if you tried something new that was putting your life in danger? It’s also a fifty percent chance of you making it through the new procedure. Embryonic stem research have not a total success in this world today. First, the treatments may not even work on a person why get your hopes up high. Second, they’re doing this thing called human cloning.
This process provides a safe alternative to embryonic cells, as the stem cells did not produce tumors. Adult stem cells are also being found in more tissues than ever thought (Stem cell Basics). This would allow many different uses of the adult stem cells, as they can only form certain major cell types of a tissue or
yet it’s there.” Stem Cell causes numerous consequences for, it was not reliable and this should undertake deeper studies on the other hand this was the only hope for the person suffering from diseases. We should thank God for the life we have. All of us have a special purpose, it is to live and do God’s will. People were God’s creation all of us were obliged to love one another not to hurt others especially the embryos inside the mother’s
Most people in our society, no matter what level of education that they may have, have heard of the cloning, specifically the cloning of Dolly the lamb, and have some notions regarding the idea of cloning humans. "The successes in animal cloning suggest to some that the technology has matured sufficiently to justify its application to human cloning" (Jaenisch et al.). However, not every agrees that human cloning is a something that should be put into practice (Hoskins). There generally seem to be two basic divisions on this issue: those who find it inappropriate and unethical, and those who find it a reasonable and necessary step in the progression of scientific research (Lustig).
Do you know that based on the scientific studies, 90% human cloning tuned out to be unsuccessful. Human cloning(modifying babies) is a process of producing new identical babies by altering their genomes. Some of studies show that scientists successfully cloned animals such as cows, Pigs, and sheep. For the past 3-5 years human cloning have a lot of debates and controversies between peoples. However Human cloning is dangerous for the new engineered baby and their moms, so it should be banned to prevent new disease, to constantly limit the population of dying human beings, and to stop unnecessary fees to modify babies.
Many people view this as destroying a potential for life to futher scientific research and knowledge. A lot of the opposition to stem cell research comes from the moral belief that human life begins at conception and some see it that destroying an embryo for medical research or even to treat another human is morally the same as killing a human child or adult for research. Many people with these views are strongly religious Roman Catholics or Orthodox