Human Nature Human nature is what keeps us alive and not dead before our time. Some people want to go against what is natural for humans but they seem to die before long and they are not killed by other humans but by nature itself. This can be very simple or very difficult to understand, human nature that is. Heat and cold, water and everything can kill you if you go against what human nature tells you to do and it does not tell you like how we are talking now but has feeling that only that one person can feel their own, but when this does happen listen closely and listen well to what it has to say before you do anything on the matter or else you just might end up six feet under. Jack London tells of one such story in his short story “To Build …show more content…
In the story he goes out in Alaskan forest called the Yukon about 50 below zero without a partner to go with him. Very dumb because what if something were to happen to you such as you are too cold to move or feel your hands and feet, plus you are wet and need to make a fire to survive and you cannot which in the end you die by freezing to death. He was a new comer and had no idea what was in store for him during these long day without the sun to get some of the warmth from. When you are new you should listen to people how have been where you are at and take their advice to heart and do what they say without …show more content…
Human nature is about knowing what is right and what is wrong to do in different problems when they arise at different times or even at the same time. Cocky is one sure way to lead yourself into a grave without even being aware that you are digging your grave and about to fall into it. This can and will lead to most likely death if you do not know what you are doing or if you have no idea what is going to happen while you are at there. Dumb is the worst way to die because you know you did not have to die because you could have said no I will not go out when some says not to go out when it is that cold
Jon Krakauer attempts to understand the inner-workings of a man named Chris McCandless, who goes on an outrageous journey into the Alaskan wilderness, in his book Into The Wild. Krakauer romanticizes McCandless’s reckless venture by telling of his own escapades, however, McCandless’s mission should not be idolized. McCandless had overestimated himself and underestimated the wilderness when he went on his deadly adventure. McCandless went around a large portion of the lower half of North America and survived with little help. He believed because he could survive without provisions in these areas, he could also do so in Alaska.
He has his sights firmly set on his Alaskan journey and nothing will influence his plan. McCandless’s independence makes him a free spirit, but this does not mean that he was a hero by any means. Rather, Krakauer makes the argument that McCandless was ignorant and naive. Krakauer says about McCandless that he was “rash, untutored in the ways of the backcountry and incautious to the point of foolhardiness” (85). McCandless’s ignorance led him to refuse offers of better gear to live in the outdoors, saying “No thanks”, “I’ll be fine with what I’ve got” (6).
Into the Wild Essay In 1992, 24 year old Christopher McCandless abandoned his possessions and decided to hitchhike to Alaska and invent a new life for himself. Chris had just finished college and many thought he was going to further his education but instead he took a fatal trip into the wild. There are many questions still unanswered to why he felt he needed to go on this trip and people will never know the real reason why Chris McCandless hitchhiked to Alaska by himself with insufficient equipment.
So many people tried to help McCandless, but those were the same people he wanted to leave behind. One of them, Gallien recognized that McCandless lacked the basic necessities to survive in the Alaskan Bush, “he has no food except for a ten pound bag of rice, his hiking boots are not waterproof, and his rifle is too small for the large game he will have to kill in order to survive…” Gallien tried to talk McCandless out of an unsafe, unmarked route, but McCandless was too hot headed and ignorant to take that into consideration. Another man, who went by Stucky bought rice for McCandless and told him he's too early, that there was too much snow out and nothing is growing yet. But McCandless shrugged him off and went anyway. “Stucky points out, ‘Alex you're too early.
The very first page of this book we are presented with a letter from Alex, who is obviously leaving home. The letter I believed was a really cool way to give us the background of the story we needed to know on a personal level. This was our first look at Alex. He seems excited to be out in the Alaskan bush. Not too many people would be excited about that.
The Dumbest Man Ever What would you do to stay warm in the klondike’s? In the book “To Build A Fire” by Jack London, the main character is unable to survive in the Klondike’s alone. The characters include the old man, the main character, and the main character’s dog 1.His first mistake was that he ignored others advice. 2. His second mistake is that he went in the coldest time of the year.
For years, man and nature have coexisted in harmony, but in recent years, man and nature have become increasingly disconnected, as air conditioning, GMO’s, and other innovations have been made to combat the natural way of life. Some people, such as Christopher McCandless, wish to be one with nature again. As his journey into the Alaskan wilderness proved, nature and man have a glorious and close, but sometimes the unforgiving and hostile relationship, as some men admire nature, but nature is not forgiving of simple mistakes as some minor misdoings can seal one’s fate. This is proven in Jon Krakauer’s novel, Into the Wild, as nature was unforgiving of Christopher’s mistakes while attempting to survive in the Alaskan wilderness. This relationship
Throughout the course of Jon Krakauer’s Into The Wild the reader can see that time and time again Chris McCandless is unprepared for what lies ahead of him, which is why he is not a noble man, nor should his journey be considered noble. While it is true that McCandless had gone on adventures before, nothing had prepared him for the bitter cold climate and the lack of food he had in Alaska. McCandless was not prepared physically or mentally and he did not bring anywhere near enough supplies for someone planning to spend the summer in the harsh environment of Alaska. While it wasn’t foolish for Chris to go out and try to find happiness for himself, it was foolish of him to have been unprepared to begin a difficult adventure in Alaska. Chris McCandless
The Alaskan Bush is one of the hardest places to survive without any assistance, supplies, skills, and little food. Jon Krakauer explains in his biography, Into The Wild, how Christopher McCandless ventured into the Alaskan Bush and ultimately perished due to lack of preparation and hubris. McCandless was an intelligent young man who made a few mistakes but overall Krakauer believed that McCandless was not an ignorant adrenalin junkie who had no respect for the land. Krakauer chose to write this biography because he too had the strong desire to discover and explore as he also ventured into the Alaskan Bush when he was a young man, but he survived unlike McCandless. Krakauer’s argument was convincing because he gives credible evidence that McCandless was not foolish like many critics say he was.
Jack London 's writing is harsh poetry. He describes scenes in such detail. Reading his work makes you picture how the scenes look in your head. He shows a deeper meaning in the events of his stories(Napierkowski). The point of view of the story is third person limited omniscient.
In the end, his imagination was what helped him defeat Spitz. For this reason, Jack London was not a nature
He chose not to bring a map, compass, watch because he didn’t want to know what time, day, month or year it was when he went into the wild. He also made the decision not to bring any real food except a 10 lb bag of rice, and a book about plants. Interestingly, one of Chris’s favorite authors was Jack London who wrote the short story “To Build a Fire.” We know Chris was “mesmerized by London’s turgid portrayal of life in Alaska and the Yukon, [and] McCandless read and reread The Call of The Wild, White Fang, [and] “To Build a Fire”(Krakauer 44). The man from “To Build a Fire” made a lot of mistakes in the story that were very crucial.
A natural human instinct is to do anything in order to survive. Though a person may not necessarily want to survive, the physical body of a person does. The body naturally will try to do anything in order to protect itself and survive even when the person does not notice. Survival comes at a cost that not all people are willing to pay. To survive there are struggles and obstacles that not all are willing to face, but to get through these obstacles an individual is one step closer to survival.
Nature and men have always been in conflict. Even though humans are part of Nature, we see ourselves as entities unrelated to it. Since the prehistory, we have been using Nature at our favor mostly to feed ourselves.
The short story of a man wandering across the Yukon Territory in midwinter creates a multitude of feelings in the reader. However, no feeling is stronger than the suspense about the survival of the main character. The man sets out alone to cross the Yukon Territory alone, despite warnings about the dangers of doing so. These dangers as told to us through through the eyes of a narrator develop the anticipation that keeps the story entertaining. Jack London’s effective use of basic literary techniques such as narration and conflict in the short story “To Build a Fire” is successful in keeping the reader involved throughout the story.