Critically analyze the impact of the Human Rights Act 1998
It is an Act which gives more effect to rights and freedom which is running by the European convention on it. It is an Act made by the parliament of United Kingdom. This Act has been given the fully support and assent to be used from the 9th of November 1998 but fortunately it is forced to used on 2nd October 2000.From this date the usage of this Human Rights Act 1998 got increased compared from when it got assent to be used. All the United Kingdom law which contained in the European convention on Human Rights are involved in the Act.
The European Convention on Human Rights- After Second World War, the Council of Europe started the ECHR , to prevent such horrors happening
…show more content…
Each article addresses a different law. These are all taken from the ECHR and are commonly called "the Convention rights
Article 2: Right to life 1. The right of everyone to life is protected by law. No one can be deprived of his life intentionally save in execution of a sentence of a court following his conviction of a crime for which the penalty prescribed by law.2. Death should not be regarded as inflicted in contravention of this article when it occurs as a result of the use of force, which is more than necessary Example case - Pretty v United Kingdom [2002]
Article 3: Freedom from torture and inhuman or degrading treatment As expected, the government should not inflict such treatment on you. They must also be protected if someone treats you that way. If they know that this right is violated, they should intervene to stop it. The State should also investigate credible allegations of such treatment. Example case - Chahal v United Kingdom
…show more content…
You have the right to personal liberty. This means that you should not be imprisoned or detained without a valid reason. If you are arrested, the Law on Human Rights states that you are entitled to: be told in a language that you understand why he has been arrested and face charges that be brought to justice without delay bail (provisional release while continuing the trial), subject to certain conditions have a trial within a reasonable time go to court to challenge their detention if you think it is illegal, and if compensation was illegally detained.
Article 6: Right to a fair trial which he is charged with a crime and has to go to court, or a public authority makes a decision that has an impact on their civil rights or obligations. In this context, civil rights and obligations are recognized in the areas of UK law, including the right to property, the law of planning, family law, contract law and labor law. It's a good idea to get more tips if you think that the right to a fair and public trial could apply to you. Example case-DG v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (ESA)
Kolton Copple AMC 1020 April 21, 2015 Word Count: Restriction of Civil Liberties during the second red scare Durring the late 1950s after World War two ended a period know as the red scare came about. Even though the the communist party in America faded quickly after World War two Americans still feared communist sympathizers would help the Solvit Union and China commit acts of espionage. During the 1940s, Republican campaigners claimed that Roosevelt, labor union leaders, and other Democrats had communist ties.
Some deny medical help especially in children who have no word against their parents. Article 19 helps this situation because it provides medical assistance to children who are in need. In my opinion this article protects the lives of individuals, but also invades personal belief. Article 3 is the article that specifies that all men have equal rights and no individual has more privileges than others, and the law treats everyone
Human rights have been around for as long as we can remember now, but in the recent years they have been really precise. Even with the laws getting stricter, there are many and it is hard to get every single person to do the right thing and be reasonable, in this case to obey and respect human rights. That’s why to this day human rights are not acknowledged to the extent that they should be. While human rights being actualized should be the goal, many countries and people already have disagreements with them. Furthermore, for them to be strict and final for every person would not to be possible any time in the near future as they weren’t in the past.
Elie Wiesel was truly a courageous figure during the torturous years of the Holocaust. In his best selling novel titled Night, Elie portrays many events that completely shatter most human rights laws established by modern day activists such as the United Nations. According to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, there are thirty different articles established to protect us from people violating our treasured human rights. Within the declaration, two articles really stand out for Elie’s situation such as article five and eighteen. Both of these articles accurately despic great human rights violations that were performed throughout Elie’s experience during the mournful Holocaust.
Human rights protection is alleged as an international affair and our rights values are euro-centrically influenced, according to the article. Jonathan Wolff’s article advocates for the need of balancing and protecting human rights, especially the second-generation rights as they are equally, if not the most essential to the first-generation
Imposition on Human Rights The modern conception of civil liberties involves a long list of individual rights which include the right to liberty and security of person, rights to property and privacy, right to a fair trial and the rights to free speech. These civil and political rights are now framed as “human rights” and are protected by numerous international treaties. Freedom of movement is also broadly recognised in international law and bills of rights. Article 13 of Universal Declaration of Human Rights provides that everyone has the right to freedom of movement and residence within borders of each state.
During the trial I assumed he was given bail, as the level of security did not seem as high as it might be, should he be in custody. Specifically, When Judge Levy suggested to adjourn for a lunch break, he advised the accused that he was allowed to go for in the public area, as there was no jury and all witnesses were interviewed. The decision of bail can be made on the basis that the accused is presumed to be innocent until proven guilty, on the basis of the crime, and on the best interest of the state’s resources. Considering the burden of proof was on the Defense (as discussed in the ‘statement of the defense’ below), and that many believe ‘certain types of offenders such as drug dealers (…) ought to be denied bail in all circumstances’ , it is surprising that Judge Levy came to this
The “Four Freedoms” was the main reason why the Universal Declaration of Human Rights was developed. “The Declaration was drafted over two years by the Commission on Human Rights, chaired by former First Lady Eleanor Roosevelt.” (“The Four Freedoms” 1). It was adopted on December 10, 1948 and is known to be “one of the most widely translated documents in the world” (“The Four Freedoms” 1). This declaration insists that all rights be upheld by governments and people to secure basic human rights (“The Four Freedoms”
Correspondingly, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights depend on dignity, equality and mutual respect – regardless of your nationality, your religion or your beliefs. Your rights are tied in with being dealt with reasonably and treating others decently, and being able to make on decisions about your own life. These fundamental human rights are: Universal; They have a place with every one of us; They can't be detracted from us, Indivisible and independent Governments should not have the capacity to choose
Human rights were initiated for the protection of the basic civil and political liberties in the general public. In the United Kingdom the Human Rights Act of 1998 came into force in October 2000. The aim of the HRA in the UK was to provide further legal effect to the basic rights and freedoms contained in the European Convention of Human Rights. The rights contained in the HRA not only affect essential matters of life and death, but also issues that occur in people 's daily life. Considering the broad range of basic rights covered, it is not astonishing that the HRA is viewed as one of the most significant segments of legislation ever passed in the UK.
It changed the legal landscape by introducing a new approach to interpretation into UK legislation that is sometimes known as the “compatibility approach” or the “abstract purposive approach”. Interpretation of legislation is governed by s.3(1) of HRA . This provision applies to cases where any of the Convention rights are concerned. If an Act cannot be read compatibly with ECHR when the words are clear then s.4(2) of HRA states, “If the court is satisfied that the provision is incompatible with a Convention right, it may make a declaration of that incompatibility”
[5] Common law works in a different way, the judges rather than the Parliament make common law or ‘judge-made law’. Considering criminal and civil cases, the judges take decisions based on the stare decisis principle (Latin “to stand by things decided”, the legal principle of determining points in litigation according to precedent [4]), deliver rulings and create precedents, thus applying the law to real life situations. Therefore, the value of the precedent is very high in the English Common Law system. The strengths of common law
The use of ECHR or European Convention on Human Rights in British courts before it was being incorporated into United Kingdom law is an example. UK and any other country which relies to the power of legislation, should always if possible do not conflicts with the international law. Therefore the supremacy of both laws depends on the acceptance if the municipal courts to the international law
A significant number of international human rights and environmental instruments show how environmental protection contributes to the enjoyment of human rights. Human rights became a focus of international law long before environmental concerns did. While the United Nations Charter of 1945 marked the beginning of modern international human rights law, the Stockholm Declaration of 1972 is generally seen as the starting point of the modern international framework for environmental protection. Certain international human rights instruments concluded after the 1972 United Nations Conference on the Human Environment explicitly recognized the linkage between human rights and the environment.
Although the modern foundation of ‘human rights ' arose from magna Carter in 1215, the document did not give rights, but guaranteed certain ‘liberties '. The first concept of the term ‘human rights ' is attributed to John Locke (1632-1704) in his work entitled: ‘ An Essay Concerning Human Understanding '. Although Locke did not use the term ‘human rights’, his efforts laid the foundation that people should be allowed to advance their potentials in the society in so far such acts do not harm other individuals. Human right wore an international mantle after mantle the 2nd World War and has now been documented in international mantle after the Second World War and has now been documented in international, regional and national