State acts as an instrument of power. One of the most important responsibilities a state has is to ensure security and protection for its citizens. Given all the instrument of power, loyalty and allegiance given by the individuals to the state, citizens therefore depend on the state for protection of their rights and freedom. The state is obliged to promote individual rights on social, regional and domestic level. The state is the bearer of duties in respect of individuals who depend on it for protection of their rights and are entitled to claim against it for violation of those rights. In our current world there have been cases of states committing atrocities to their people all the name of state-government interests so as to cover up or justify …show more content…
This was meant to be a democratic process that the state had undertaken in 15 years since the military dictatorship was removed. Ethiopian people’s revolutionary democratic front (EPDRF) coalition won the elections . The opposition felt it was unfair to them by alleging that there had been some foul play in the elections. The opposition comprised of the United Ethiopian Democratic Forces and also the Oromo Federalist Democratic movement. The Ethiopian people’s revolutionary democratic front ( EPDRF) which emerged as the winner claimed that the opposition wanted to over throw the regime by way/means that were not constitutional.
This led to the ruling party and the opposition to have an altercation that led to violence in the state. The CUD which was part of the opposition called for civil disobedience that resulted to massive riots and excessive use of force by the police and military toward the citizens and some political leaders. There were many human rights violations by the state which included civil killings, detention without charge, restriction to freedom of assembly, violence against women and children, denial of their trial and freedom of
…show more content…
On the regional level the African Union also came in as an observer to ensure the legitimacy of the elections . Not only did they observe but they also intervened when the state was in crisis after the elections. African Union focuses on the promotion of peace, security and stability on the continent as a prerequisite for the implementation of the development and integration agenda of the institution.
On the global level the ministry of foreign affairs invited a number of international observers. More than 300 international observers were deployed in Ethiopia with the European Union fielding the largest observation mission followed by the carter center. The USA was also part of the observing team on the global level but the Ethiopian government expelled them based on the democracy assistance group, the national democratic institute, the international republican institute and international foundation for electoral systems which prevented them from offering important assistance. As much as USA did not agree with incident it went ahead and provided aid to Ethiopia because the two states considered each other allies when it came to war against
One is the central government for the political authority that governs an entire nation. The other is the state government which is for the people who live in that specific state. These two governments consequently gave double security for the rights of the people. “The different governments will each control each other, at the same time, control itself.”
The reasons for involvement, mainly include the seek of the United States aid as an ally in a powerful world, and the prevention of
When it comes to the famine in Ethiopia, how did the government make it worse? In the 1980s, a famine in Ethiopia occurred and was one of the worst events of the twentieth century. Ethiopia’s food shortage and hunger crisis led to at least one million deaths. A question asked a lot is why the famine of 1983 to 1985 was so disastrous. One of the main focuses was because of the government's actions and programs.
Although these are the duties of the national government to the state government this relationship is not always entirely clear, of current that national government has a lot more power and authority of the states government. Also it can be interpreted that the national government is supposed to deal with issues on a grander scale while the state governments are supposed to deal with more local issues. Another reason why the obligations the national government has to the states is not always clear is because it says that the national government should protect states from internal discourse which is extremely vague as to what internal discourse or “domestic violence”, whether this means violence within the state or violence between states it is unclear, and could be interpreted multiple ways in order for the national government to gain more power. A way to make this clearer would be for a change in Article 4, Section 4 that states what “domestic violence” is so that there is a formal definition regarding states as to what the duty of the national government is regarding internal discourse. Although this Section defines the relationship that the
The national and state government both have power which the people can appoint to represent them. It imposes laws to keep corruption and illegal behavior from those that can hurt citizens. Under the constitution we have checks and balances. It distributes power onto the Executive, Judicial, and Legislative so no one is more powerful than the other. Our government has created laws to keep peace and order within its borders.
These intentions disclose the structure of government it aims to articulate and subsequently protect over time. In doing so, it lists only governmental powers that are necessary to maintain its enduring political system, which reflects the state’s identity and indirectly promotes civic virtue. Powers regarding various policy areas are not included as they are instead determined by the people via the legislature. As an extension to this, in order to preserve its fundamental ramifications, the constitution must be drafted in a manner that makes it difficult to amend. By retaining a rigid amendment process, it protects the people from the passions of small factions that threaten to sabotage its original meaning.
DBQ: Famine in Ethiopia: How did the government make it worse? (hook)From 1983-1985, a famine in Ethiopia caused millions to die. In 1984, grain prices increased by 300% and five Ethiopian provinces set all-time lows for rainfall. Many people, blamed the famine on the drought, but later figured out that the real cause was politics. Soviet-backed communist Derg took over and worsened the famine.
As a result the people in the community started protesting for the government to do something about it. At the end of the day, the government decided to solve the problem just when the protest was about to turn ugly and
Protester wasn’t happy with the judgment. Because of the ruling there was riots going on and some people went to jail. Mehserle was sentenced to 2 years, but got out 11 months later because good behavior.
Civil disobedience has been discerned in numerous time periods of American history. The definition of disobedience can be interpreted when one or a group prioritizes their conscience of their beliefs over the dictation of laws through rebellion. Notable historical events of slavery and independence has been marked with the disobedience of government laws. Even though the disobedience of societal laws can undermine the corruption of the government, disobedience has undeniably steer societal progress. A form of civil disobedience was the fight for independence of the colonies in the American Revolution.
Violations of our Everyday Life During the Holocaust, many of the Human Rights we exercise today were broken. Consequently, millions of innocent and law-abiding people were killed during this time. The Jews were forced to labor endlessly in concentration camps, and lives were changed for the worse. Three of our precious Human Rights that were broken were: Our right to equality, freedom from discrimination, and the license from torture and degrading treatment. Their equality was destroyed at the start of the Holocaust.
According to this document, what are the fundamental roles of government and the individual citizen? According to this document, the fundamental roles of the government was to make sure their citizens were seen as equal in rights and in religious tolerance. Also, citizens should be treated fairly for example, when in prison and on trial. Finally, the government had to make sure that citizens had secure foundational rights such as speaking freely and expressing political concerns.
For example civil disobedience is the moral responsibility of each and every single citizen because they are the second and largest half of what makes up a state and in order to keep the balance in power people have to fight for what they believe is correct. Gandhi claims that no state is possible with the rulers nor the ruled, both parts have to be present to make a state.
To govern oneself as one wished is an attribute of independence. A sovereign state may not be disturbed by another state unless it has given the right to intervene. When a state attaches legal consequences to conduct in another state, it exercises control over that conduct, and when such control affects essential interests in the foreign state, it may constitute an interference with the sovereign rights of that foreign
INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS BE A MECHANISM FOR EAST AFRICAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. FORTUNATA MULEKUZI REGISTRATION NUMBER: PG201401993 A CONCEPT NOTE SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE UNIVERSIDADE FERNANDO PESSOA AND OPEN UNIVERSITY OF TANZANIA 2016 Background to the Problem The phenomenon international relations emerged at the beginning of the 20th century largely in the West and in particular in the United States as that country grew in power and influence. Bloomfield et al.