Munir, Lily. Islam and Human Rights. First of all, it should be said that "the question whether or not Islam is compatible with international human rights has been a long debate" (Munir 1). The thing is that traditionally Islam is taken by people, who do not know its main ideas, as a very strict and sometimes even cruel religion, that controls and limits the life of people who adhere to it. Munir in her work Islam and human rights also underlines the fact that Islamic Law has always been taken negatively in the West, because of a great number of various prejudices connected with it (1). The author says that various harsh punishments and the state of affairs in modern Muslim countries are very often used as the evidence of the cruelty …show more content…
This issue is not new for the author as he has been investigating the nature of Islam for a long period of time. Due to this very fact, he is able to introduce some thoughts obtained with the help of deep investigation. Sachedina admits that fact that Islam is taken as the religion which is not able to fit in the main peculiarities of humanism and tolerant approach towards a human being (3). Thus, the author says that "it will be a mistake to think that even the most traditionalist Muslim thinkers are against the need for universal human rights to protect human dignity" (Sachedina 6). With this in mind, it is possible to state that Islam at least does not contradict with the ideas of humanism as thinkers assume that some universal law could be created. Moreover, the author also suggests the idea that the human character of Islam and respect towards human rights could be proved by the fact that according to this religion all people are equal to God. (Sachedina 11). This point could also prove democratic and tolerant inclinations of Islam. With this in mind, the author concludes that the idea that the Islamic law has no right to exist in terms of humanistic approach towards a human being is completely wrong and full of prejudices. Thus, nowadays, the necessity of change is obvious as humanistic character of modern society determines the way
Slavery had a key role in the cultures of Muslim and European people. The documents provided, after being analyzed, tell that the thoughts about slavery from each culture were different. The documents also state that the reasons for the differences in the opinions about slavery were because of religions and basic cultural ideals. Nevertheless, there were some similarities between their slavery. One of the most important is the social status of the slaves.
The crusades were a huge thing in the medieval times. They lasted for hundreds of years and people believed it was their religious duty to fight, because they thought it would please God. They were also promised access to heaven, by the pope. The crusades involved three main religions Christianity, Judaism and Islam. I believe that the muslims were more to blame for the crusades, because they posed the first threat, and because they killed and sold many into slavery.
In addition, Brigitte claims that Islam incarnates violence and accuses it to “supersede” any man-made law via the Sharia law. To respond to her claims, the author
Emphasizing that the present may go on a setback towards the past. Adding examples of what happened and making the audience fearful. By demonstrating what the details were and how everyone felt. On the other note, the author also notes on medical references and particular individuals suffering from the effects of torture.
Islam started in Mecca during the time of the powerful prophet Muhammad. Through military conquest, trade, and pilgrimages, Arab Muslims forces gained vast territories over time. Muslims inherited countless costumes from Greece, Rome, and India. Also they would adopted new advances in mathematics, astronomy and Muslims. This includes Greece, Rome, and India.
The issue of the veil has come to represent the essence of Islam, not only to the West, but also to Muslim Conservatives and Fundamentalists. To some in the West, the veil represents repression and constriction of women’s freedom and choice, limiting their capacity for self-determination. However, some Muslims would argue that women must veil because it is a first step towards restoring true Islam and a defiance against the West Interventionist policies (Lazreg, Why Women Should Not Wear the Veil, pg. 113). Additionally, the idea of freedom as the ultimate value, is a western standard and that for some, piety is more important. Lila Abu-Lughod and Marnia Lazreg have contrasting views on the veiling of Muslim women and the affects it has on their lives.
There are roughly 1.8 million muslims in our world today. How did this happen? How is 24% of our world’s population based on Islam? In the year 610 CE, a young merchant trader went to pray and heard the words of Allah from the angel Gabriel. After some resistance, Muhammed decided to spread the words and the birth of Islam began.
“The Islamic teachings have left great traditions for equitable and gentle dealings and behavior, and inspire people with nobility and tradition” (H.G. Wells). The society and world around us are greatly influenced by the muslim people, or more specifically, the influence of the Islamic world. Their impact on the world is a controversial topic and their role is also often seen as negative. People are constantly oppressing minorities, but without the Muslims or teachings of Islam, the world wouldn’t be the same. This group of people achieved so many things that are considered necessary to our world today, and not many people recognize that.
The author believes that the thoughts of enlightened societies are unwise and ascertains that there are situations whereby torture becomes morally mandatory in dealing with terrorists.
A. PREAMBLE The terrorist attack on September 11, 2001 has sparked intense curiosity and interest in the world especially the West to learn and investigate the religion of Islam. The Muslim people are portrayed as violent and barbaric, and Islam as oppressive and antithesis to human rights values. Thus, escalation of public opinion about Islam has encouraged debates and forums, and also stirred demonstrations and movements which have compelled the Muslims to speak out their minds and interpret and recast their texts viz. Quran and Sunnah of prophet Mohammad and even question and challenge the prevailing culture and practices, and domineering structures.
Correspondingly, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights depend on dignity, equality and mutual respect – regardless of your nationality, your religion or your beliefs. Your rights are tied in with being dealt with reasonably and treating others decently, and being able to make on decisions about your own life. These fundamental human rights are: Universal; They have a place with every one of us; They can't be detracted from us, Indivisible and independent Governments should not have the capacity to choose
Springer (2009) believes that violence is a gross stereotype which is associated with the depiction of the culture in the context of 'war in terror '. African, Asian and Islamic cultures are said to be highly violent. Thus, any discourse that suggests violence should be viewed as contextually specific, because it is bound to particular places in which the culture of violence is formed. Therefore,
Week Outline Preliminary Thesis Statement: Religion is an essential constituent of any civilization with a unique spiritual pathway. Main Point: Religious spirituality establishes the framework for human social and cultural development. 1. Topic Sentence:
“Cultural Relativist and Feminist Critique of International Human Rights- Friends or Foes?” The journal, “Cultural Relativist and Feminist Critique of International Human Rights- Friends or Foes?” by Oonagh Reitman have the aim to know deeper about the two critiques towards the universal Human Rights by the two major theory, which are the Cultural Relativism and Feminism, how they see the universal Human Rights theory. The Journal address for the workshop discussion matter regarding to the similarities on critique of International human rights that made by the Cultural relativist and the feminist. “ Human Rights is the right that given and held by human simply because they are human, and it does not classified nor held by certain groups or not the subject to variation in culture”(Donnelly 1989: 109-110) From the introduction in the journal, the writer defines how the feminist and the cultural relativist express their idea of Universal human rights. The idea of Universal human rights from Donnelly were being reserve by Relativist, they argue that the human rights itself root from culture and due to the variation of culture, making the human rights not universal.
I come from the Muslim culture and will share some of the cultural characteristics. Traditions: Most important one is prayer. We have to pray 5 times a day and read the Holy Quran. We have to fast a whole month during Ramadhan and go for Pilgrimage at least once in a lifetime.