According to Annamaria Bottini, “ animal tests provide their contribution, both with regard to costs and time to market and, more importantly, when wrong decisions on the efficacy and safety of lead substances are taken based on the animal tests performed in the R&D process” (Bottini 9). Moreover, Animal testing makes a astronomical difference in the development process. It can eliminate mistakes that might occur if no testing or clinical testing is done. If a mistake is not caught, it can cost a company a lot of money in going back to resolve the issue that could have been avoided in the first place. That time spent going back costs, researchers a great sum of money.
So, people can remain hopeful that soon animal testing will be a thing of the past. However, there are some doubts about how tests can be accurately carried out without being used on a living organism. Today there are a lot of curable diseases which used to be fatal that shows
Most of the drugs tested on animals could still be dangerous and make the animal’s sacrifice worthless. Even though animal testing has also helped to create several life-saving cures and treatments, hundreds of animals had to die, all of them having no need or responsibility to sacrifice themselves for humans. When these cures are being made, a disease may only effect ten to fifteen people, but humans would still test on hundreds of animals. A jungle filled with monkeys could be captured and tested on until they die, for just a couple of humans that are sick with a disease that requires a medicine unable to found within animal testing, but the animals would still die. Not only does animal testing not give 100% accurate results, there are also many other ways that can help humans test
Animal experimentation is wrong because animals can register pain just like humans, the medication is not reliable, and money is lost when it is ineffective. Scientist are intentionally infecting animals with diseases, force-feeding chemicals, blinding, burning, mutilating, and leaving them to suffer (Moore 1). There some actions that can be taken to reduce the amount of animal experiment that is being done. The three R’s research replacement, reduction, and refinement (Conlee 1). Scientist can develop a bond with their subject and begin to care to for the animal subject.
Animal testing is not a reliable way to test medicines, animal testing is wasteful and dangerous, and above all animals are not like us. To begin, Animal testing is not a reliable way to test medicines. According to Cruelty free international “It is not surprising to find that treatments showing ‘promise’ in animals rarely work in humans”. This shows that animals
Animal testing is known as the experimental use of animals for scientific, cosmetic and medical research that seek to control the variables that affect the behavior or biological system under study. It is estimated that around 50 to 100 million of animals are used for testing. Most animal testing is paid through funding about 40% of the funds received are provided to animal testing in the name of research. Of these research 45% is used to identify medical studies, 30% to identify psychological research and 25% for cosmetic and other researchers. “The treatment and testing of animals is a widely controversial subject that many believe isn’t necessary.
Animal experiments are conducted to test whether the manufactured drugs, that are going to be put out in the market, are safe. They are also conducted as research purposes, like discovering cures for untreatable diseases. However, animal testing has been called in to question because its cruelty and lack of promised results. Is it possible to assume animal testing has become unnecessary? First of all, the conduction of animal experimentation can be easily rejected because of the immorality and cruelty that comes with it.
It’s often used to test products as a safety precaution before they are released to the public. Although it can be useful to know the side effects of something before trying it on humans, we don’t consider the effects it can have on the animals, which are often extremely harmful and cruel. Scientists have become progressive in creating alternative methods to these experiments. Now, animal testing is nearly unnecessary because there are alternatives which are more efficient and harmless. The rights of animals is a topic that comes up frequently, but people often turn their cheek the other way when it comes to their possessions being a product of cruelty.
According to the article, “About us” on understandinganimalresearch.org, only 0.2% of all animals in the world are used for both scientific and commercial animal testing. Animal testing is the process of experiments being done on non-human animals, and this process is performed to ensure the safety of cosmetics, drugs, and food additives. Humans only use animal testing when there is no other available options, and animal testing is practiced on endless amounts of products that are very essential in our lives today (Murnaghan). Scientists have developed great deals of vaccine and medicine, as a result, human kids, toddlers, and the elderly’s precious lives have been saved from death. Animal testing is a controversial topic in society, and while supporters
Most testing of animals is unnecessary and undertaken purely because of curiosity instead of the need to find cures to illnesses. Animal testing should be banned to protect the rights of animals since they cannot protest, speak up, or have any say in the situation. Animals suffer the abuse from harmful experiments to supposedly provide us with new cures which hardly occurs. We would not sacrifice one disabled child’s life in hope to save 1,000 children, so why sacrifice the life of an animal in hope to find a cure for an illness. Most advances in medical sciences have been through human testing and not through animal testing.