Hume's Argument Against Induction By David Hume

230 Words1 Page
Hume’s argument against induction is that “only meaningful propositions are relations of idea and matter of fact”. This meaning that the claim must be priori or a posteriori. However, Hume contradicts himself because his own argument does not meet his own criteria of a meaningful proposition. This is because his statement is not a relation of ideas or a matter of fact. The grue-problem is almost like predicting what will happen in the future based on what happened in the past. For example, Sandeep decides to eat a sandwich, but his girlfriend stops him because she says it will turn into a monster after the first bite. Sandeep then says that when he ate this type of sandwich before it did not turn into a monster. So based on past experiences
Open Document