Hume's Criticism Of The Kalam Cosmological Argument
Since, Hume denies causation and metaphysic given that God-talk is a metaphysical notion it follows that, for him, the Kalam cosmological argument is flawed.
Hume’s argument mentioned above suggests that there can be a beginning without a cause. As a counter argument, Anscombe would say that, Hume can “imagine” may be say a rabbit coming into being. This means to say that Hume who is imagining the rabbit coming into being is the cause of the rabbit’s coming into existence (50). In addition, Kant on Hume’s view that there is no causal link or necessary connection would say that, Hume has made a mistake in not reasoning that when he denies causation he is actually using the category of causation. What helps us to understand causation are the categories of
…show more content…
He argues that, there is no evidence of absolute beginning. This criticism targets the second premise (P2). He asserts that indeed the evidence have shown that there was a Big Bang but do we have enough evidence that the Big Bang was an absolute beginning (ed. Boslough 85). How accurate is the scientific evidence for this conclusion? Is that proof of an absolute beginning? What if the universe was just eternal recurrence? Is it not that ascribing to Big Bang a model that shows human limitedness? In the same line of thought, does it mean that the universe did not existed before the Big Bang or it just explains science’s limitation? (Davies 52) Another question raised as an objection to the Kalam cosmological argument is that, why do we say that things are expanding, what if they are collapsing? Looking at science we would appreciate that science can change. It is not static, new theories can come up. For instance, the Newtonian theory was replaced by the Einsteinian theory, we moved from geocentricism to heliocentrism. Given that science is still growing would we say that the Big Bang theory has an absolute bearing to the existence of the
Kalam Cosmological Argument Essay
590 Words | 3 PagesEverything that begins to exist has a cause of its existence 2. The universe began to exist 3. Therefore, the universe has a cause of existence His defense of the Kalam Cosmological Argument revolves mostly around the second premise. This is mostly due to him finding the first premise as intuitively obvious, where he claims that “no one, seriously denies it”. From experience, we find that physical objects do not come into existence without causes.
William Lane Craig's Cosmological Argument
296 Words | 2 PagesI think William Lane Craig made a strong argument when it came to a cosmological argument. He does have a point that there is an explanation of how the world came to be but there is more to it, such as dates and things like that. He says that the ultimate question in philosophy would be “why does anything exists”? He brings up that atheist think that the universe is eternal but he says there is reasons why the universe began. He says its obscured to think that its number of past events is infinite, which he says leads to self-contradictions.
David Hume's Claim Against Miracles
214 Words | 1 PagesHume's claim against miracles is that it does not matter how strong the evidence for a miracle it may be it is rather more rational to reject the miracle than to believe in it. Hume states that there are two ways in order to decide to believe a piece of evidence. The reliability of a witness is the first factor. A witness can be dishonest or be ignorant about a situation which would make their claims worth little. So Humes says to take in consideration how reliable the witness is.
William Paley's The Teleological Argument
802 Words | 4 PagesAgain premise three says ‘Generally, when effects resemble each other, their causes do as well’. In Hume’s objection it says if two things are exactly alike, then they are general caused by things that are exactly alike. The world is not exactly like a machine though, some parts may be comparable but there are immense differences. One example from class was a crater created by a bomb and a crater created by a meteorite. Another example is a forest fire; it could be created by a lighting strike or by human fault.
Jim Jones Quotes
1082 Words | 5 PagesPhilosophy 224 Monday/Wednesday 10-11:15 WORD COUNT In a small village, deep in the South American jungle of Guyana, two men overlook a massacre of over 900 people. Of these 900 people, about 300 were children. The men stand in silence, but only for a moment, they are philosophers… HUME: “This is truly astonishing… There is no way that Jim Jones could have been a prophet…”
The Big Bang Theory
1130 Words | 5 PagesThe big bang does not explain why it took place, nor how the universe was created. However, it can be argued that the big bang theory addresses the evolution of the universe, not its creation. The big bang is simply a theory. This means, that it cannot be proven, but it can be disproven. Observations and tests carried out which support the theory have made it stronger, resulting in more people willing to accept it.
Cosmological Vs Ontological Argument
1444 Words | 6 PagesThe cosmological argument looks to the world to prove God’s existence rather than pure definitions. The proponent of the cosmological argument was St. Thomas Aquinas, a theologian in the eleventh century CE (Solomon). He proposed that everything that exists must have a cause, and that the cause was God (Aquinas). Aquinas’ first point was based off of motion, that nothing can be both the mover and moved. An item sitting in place has the potential to be moving, but cannot move unless something that is already moving imparts motion to it
The Design Argument: Does God Exist
965 Words | 4 PagesPhilosopher David Hume’s argument against William Paley’s addresses the most common criticism in why Paley is wrong. Hume’s points out two major flaws in Paley’s argument that there is a creator of the universe. The first argument is the lack of evidence, in which he states that the existence of such a creator can only be proved through the a pattern of observation, which there is no pattern for. This addresses how without any form of pattern through observation that it is difficult to make a correlation between the universe and its designer (Speaks). Secondly he argumes that there are limitations to the design argument that Paley does not address.
God's Not Dead Analysis
915 Words | 4 PagesPg. 63). The general principles of a cosmological argument are: effects have causes, things happen and things exist for a reason, it’s trying to explain things, and all our sciences, studies, and lives are based on it (McGowan, Michael. N.p.). During Josh Wheaton’s speech in defending his belief, he uses this type of argument and talks about the Big Bang. He talked about how in the 1920s, Belgian astronomer and theist, Georges Lemaitre, said the entire universe jumping into existence in a trillionth of a second, out of nothing, in a flash of light, is how he would expect the universe to respond if God were to actually utter the command in Genesis 1:3, “let there be light”.
Thomas Aquinas Cosmological Argument
1784 Words | 8 PagesThe traditional claim of all Cosmological Arguments is defined as “something outside the universe is responsible to explain the existence of the universe” (PowerPoint 380). In the “causal argument,” or the First Cause Argument on the cosmological argument, “something” outside of the universe that is supposed to inform us about the existence of the universe is argued to be explained as God. As the first cause argument goes into depth and with the help of Thomas Aquinas, it is easy to see how God is responsible for explaining the existence of the universe around us. Within the first cause argument on the cosmological argument the following premises and conclusions are discussed: Premise 1: There exists things that are caused. Meaning that
Hume's Casual Doctrine
1989 Words | 8 PagesComparing Hume’s Casual Doctrine In the Enquiry and the Treatise Modern Philosophical Texts MA Course 0364481 The first definition of cause Hume presents in his Enquiry is ontological, whereas the second definition is psychological. The key blunder of the skeptic’s interpretation of the Enquiry is the supposition that both definitions are equal, and also the critical error of the supposition that from merely one experiment, an association of ideas can be derived. The aim of this paper is to try to attempt to summarise Hume’s position on causality as it relates to his works throughout his life’s entirety, as well as secondary views on this matter.
Compare And Contrast Descartes And Hume
1404 Words | 6 PagesLogically speaking, Hume’s theory makes the most sense due to the knowledge learned from cause and effect. I understand the relationship between the beginning to its adjacent cause and it applies to everyday life in society. Unlike Hume, Descartes suggests the origin of knowledge is logical and through self-doubt. Yet, he is unable to provide proof of the existence of god despite playing a substantial role in his theory.
Existence Of God Analysis
1027 Words | 5 PagesIn this argument we already assumed that there may be possibility that God exist and finally we reached where we started. So this argument does not give us the exact information about existence of God. There are many objections on this argument but still it is a powerful argument. In my opinion, this argument is not much satisfactory. It describes that existence is greater than imagination.
Mccloskey's Argument For The Existence Of God
1742 Words | 7 PagesOn Being an Atheist The existence of God has been a huge issue for many years. The main McCloskey's issue with the idea of God is the presence of many evils in the world. McCloskey implies that the "proofs" of the existence of God cannot establish a factual evidence which supports the existing argument of whether there is God or not. Some proofs explaining the existence of God should be dismissed because they are not valid.
The Big Bang Theory: Similarities Between Science And Religion
1172 Words | 5 PagesThe Biblical standpoint states that God created the universe from complete darkness. Now when comparing it to scientific theory, the Big Bang also started from in an abyss of nothingness and resulted in the creation of the cosmos. In essence, utilizing both of these scenarios, one can say that the Big Bang and the God’s creation of the cosmos are the same events. Now, while religion keeps it at that, by using science, they can delve deeper into this phenomena in order to see how the universe came to be. Not only will this answer the question of how we came to be, but what caused this event to happen.
More about Hume's Criticism Of The Kalam Cosmological Argument
Kalam Cosmological Argument Essay
590 Words | 3 PagesWilliam Lane Craig's Cosmological Argument
296 Words | 2 PagesDavid Hume's Claim Against Miracles
214 Words | 1 PagesWilliam Paley's The Teleological Argument
802 Words | 4 PagesJim Jones Quotes
1082 Words | 5 PagesThe Big Bang Theory
1130 Words | 5 PagesCosmological Vs Ontological Argument
1444 Words | 6 PagesThe Design Argument: Does God Exist
965 Words | 4 PagesGod's Not Dead Analysis
915 Words | 4 PagesThomas Aquinas Cosmological Argument
1784 Words | 8 PagesHume's Casual Doctrine
1989 Words | 8 PagesCompare And Contrast Descartes And Hume
1404 Words | 6 PagesExistence Of God Analysis
1027 Words | 5 PagesMccloskey's Argument For The Existence Of God
1742 Words | 7 PagesThe Big Bang Theory: Similarities Between Science And Religion
1172 Words | 5 Pages