Joe’s War shows use of humorous verbs in varying context, for example, “The princess, wearing a slave’s collar shackled to the High King’s chair. That is what I think “lost”, which makes the reader construe what the character is saying (Abercrombie, 2015, p. 7). Usually, people know princesses to have a royal life where they have everything they want by virtue of ascription, but a reader may find it improbable to picture a princess wearing shackles and tied to a king’s chair, because this usually never happens. Hence, it is creative in a way, and helps propagate what is generally know to be true.
Stephen’s Green Mile, the prison warden says, “I love paperwork” the verb ‘love’ paperwork may not sit properly with some people who may not like to like to do anything concerning paperwork, normally associated with work (King, 2000, p. 18). Hence, the context in which it is said may seem odd and at the same
…show more content…
5. Conclusion
In summary, all four novels incorporate verbum dicendi and if you read further, you will notice r-relation in some of the sentences where the relation between the verb and the meaning of the sentence structures either make sense or not. One could argue that all four novels have verbum dicendi because they contain dialogue given that verbum dicendi introduces spoken communication or quotation marks. This was particularly evident in Steven’s Malazan and Joe’s War both of which begin their chapters with spoken words in quotation marks ‘Prod and pull”, “We have lost” respectively. In both cases, the reader has an idea of what direction the story will take because these phrases begin the story and carry the weight of the story. Some of the words or phrases that appear as verbum dicendi appear as descriptive verbs for instance to denote the
Joe was dominant among others and controlling towards Janie. Everyone had high expectations for Joe and Janie, and Joe knew Janie did not have the knowledge or intelligence he had, so Joe looked down upon Janie. Janie had no background, the only placed Janie seemed to have belonged was under control by a man, and that man happened to be Joe. “Thank yuh fuh yo’ compliments, but mah wife don’t know nothin’ ‘bout no speech-makin’. Ah never married her for nothin’ lak dat.
Also, similes are tools that the author uses when portraying the situation
This is a reflection of who Joe was in the beginning of the book, where he was just another kid with no worries. It is ironic because of who Joe has developed into and what he's been through. However, by the end of the chapter, Joe is portrayed as a child who is dependent on his parents to bring him back home. His young age is an obstacle but it also provides some protection as he would be tried as a juvenile and no one really suspects him. 13-year-old Joe is already making well-advanced decisions that no regular 13-year-old would be making at this age.
There is a lot of irony in "Camp Harmony" by Louis Fiset, including the name. Camp Harmony is a place where anyone with Japanese descendants would go to during World War 2. Camp Harmony, unlike its name is a place like hell, where there is no fun, just eat, sleep and try not to die. There is no "Harmony" in the place, as it is a concentration camp, many people were trapped inside the metal gates and not allowed to leave.
To portray him as a wild animal in such a way that any normal or civil behavior is discredited. Because of this, that is why I think society antagonizes any literacies that Injun Joe may have. In my opinion, the literacies that Injun Joe has are not far from the ones that our society sees as necessary. I believe he has some literacies, but society does not see them as literacies because of the way Joe is portrayed as a hillbilly folklore in the media. He was able to learn how to survive in the wilderness and he had the mental skills and capability to outsmart law enforcements for six months.
The two texts differentiate by the form of text he uses; in his speech he talks in a speech form while in his narrative he speaks in the form of the memories of his
The motif drives the plot and lets the reader analyze the developments that occur throughout both pieces of literature. The similarities and differences of the sins committed in both prose also allow the readers to see how differently the sin played a role in the treatment and development of the
Figurative language is often used in “The Jilting of Granny Weatherall” because it shows Granny’s hallucinations. The flowery language that often personifies inanimate objects illustrates the intensity and detail of Granny’s hallucinations. For example, “Hapsy melted from within and turned flimsy as gray gauze and the baby was a gauzy shadow…” (398). Using the words “melted” and “gauzy shadow” give the reader a comprehensive picture of what Granny saw. Also, the figurative language used outside of Granny’s hallucinations help the reader understand how events occur in the story.
Those are the ways the authors make their novels satirical with the use of diction in order to differentiate the intellectual levels of the
Figurative language played a big role for understanding the story in a more profound way, and it also lets you interpret the text in different ways.
The use of irony helped move the plot along, and it made the story easy to read and follow along with. Irony helped show that in times of war, sides don’t exactly matter. You could be a patriot, but then be killed by your own friends, or you could be a loyalist and be killed at the hands of the British. During war, everyone must care for
One example of this in the reading was when he used this to describe the beauty and view of a horizon. He stated that so many people have come and go, limping on crutches or dieing, and were heroes from many wars. Then while stating the different wars, he uses this device to empathize the amount of people who came and went by listing the many wars with the conjunction or in between each one, such as, the Pacific or Europe or Korea or Vietnam or the Persian Gulf wars. A third use of a rhetorical device that I noticed throughout the reading was the author's use of euphemism. This is when the author substitutes a word for another that is more pleasant so that he or she does not come off as rude and can avoid conflict in with the readers of the story.
In Roald Dahl’s riveting short story “Lamb to the Slaughter” dramatic irony is used to build tension. Dramatic irony is defined as a literary device where the reader knows more about a situation than the characters in the story. The main character Ms. Maloney, a devoted and tender wife, suddenly turns into a reckless murderer as her husband tells her he wants to leave. Throughout the narrative a prominent example of dramatic irony is when the policemen eat the leg of lamb. " ‘That's why the weapon should be easy to find.’
It is very difficult to be able to write a piece so beautifully by giving it life using the dialect so preciously giving the reader the sense of living in that time period. The story contains grammar and sentence structure we use as we speak to one another. The way it’s written and read is very obvious, no one can deny that, but looking closely at the words as they come to life by giving them a persona of their own is completely hidden from the text. For example, when Joe and Missie were playing with each other in the kitchen and as Missie searches his pockets Joe says, “Missie May, take yo’ hand out mah pocket!” looking at that sentence right there we can tell there is a lot of spelling errors
Many different authors have different styles of writing that they use. Styles can vary to an evil, dark story, to a very humorous and funny story. O.Henry's style is very humorous and he is a master of picking when to use irony inside of his short stories. O.Henry's use of irony to entertain the reader, has humorous statements throughout the story, and his use of descriptive language and imagery to better understand the plot line is excellent in The Ransom of Red Chief.