The hunger strike is an extreme case of public disobedience, when one 's body is used as a tool in order to make a political or social statement. It has an old history and, as McCabe says, it has roots in Ancient times. In Antiquity, when a person was treated unfairly, he or she used to go the doorstep of his enemy and stay there starving to death, asking the gods for vengeance (McCabe 306). This was particularly frightening for the owner of the house because the starving man would be cursing him and his family right from the entrance of the house. Politicians are still afraid of hunger strikes and of people deciding to starve themselves because, through their actions, the strikes place the responsibility for their death entirely in the hands …show more content…
However, after a short period of peace and quiet, when the officials discovered that the prisoners were putting pressure on the media asking for fair trials, the prisoners ' leader Aamer, was put in the isolation cell, thing which led to another hunger strike. This time the hunger strike was so severe that many inmates were force fed in what the prisoners ' lawyers denounce as inhumane: "the feeding tubes, which were "the thickness of a finger," were regarded as objects of torture. She reported that they were forcibly shoved up the prisoners ' noses without anesthetic or sedatives being provided, and that this resulted in prisoners "vomiting up substantial amounts of blood," but added that when they did so, "the soldiers mocked and cursed at them,and taunted them with statements like 'look what your religion has brought you '"(qtd in Worthington 275). Here we clearly see how force feeding can become torture, and how it can denigrate human …show more content…
The role of the psychiatrist is very important, and he or she is he the one to decide whether a person is competent of making responsible decisions: "An individual is described as being competent if he has the ability to make an informed decision, regardless of whether the decision is sensible" (Brockman 453), and therefore an individual may decide to persist on his or her hunger strike until death. The Johannes Wier Foundation 's manual states that in case of hunger strike "the psyche remains clear ... there is no mental deterioration" until few hours before death occurs (qutd in Fressler 245). Therefore, doctors should not attempt force feeding the striker as he or she is still competent of making decisions. According to Fressler, "The autonomy of competent individuals is, however, to be respected, for to do otherwise is, from both ethical and legal perspectives, to commit assault" (244). A person who is not confined in prisons or mental institution and goes on a hunger strike does not have his or her right to privacy restricted and she or he is free to die of starvation. Many authors argue that the same thing should be happening in the case of
This is for sure going against the article number 5 in the universal declaration, “Nobody has any right to hurt us or to torture us”. As human beings if we have done nothing wrong even if we did anything wrong we have no right to be physically abused. Another example is when Elie Wiesels father states when Elie asked if he had eaten, “They didn’t give us anything… they said that we were sick, that we would die soon, and that it would be a waste of food” (Wiesel 107). This proves that the physical cruel treatment is happening to human rights because they are not being fed when they do not
This often leads to eating disorders as well due to the consistency of not eating from the lack of food. My favorite of the essay describes how I feel about this topic “ they should
“By depriving the body of nutrition, starvation slowly allows the body to devour its own reserves, including muscle, fat, and organs, up to the point of complete system shut-down and death. Understanding how starvation affects the body is important to recognizing the
In Night one of the ways that the Jews were dehumanized was by abuse. There were beatings, “I never felt anything except the lashes of the whip... Only the first really hurt.” (Wiesel, 57) “They were forced to dig huge trenches. When they had finished their work, the men from the Gestapo began theirs.
The guards that did not agree personally to the torturing of prisoners, but obeyed anyway, were participating in the act of Submissive Obedience, because the conscience they obeyed was not their own. The guards actions can also be explained by Philip G. Zimbardo’s “Stanford Prison Experiment”. In Zimbardo’s experiment, many young men were given absolute power as guards over prisoners, much like the soldiers at Abu Ghraib. After given few directives and told to enforce the laws of the prison, the guards at the Stanford Prison took only 3 days to
All of the prisoners were forced to look at the hanging child, “lingering between life and death, withering before our eyes” as they walked past to get their soup. Any one person could have saved him from this cruel death, but it would have only been in vain because the savior and the boy would’ve been shot (Wiesel 65). The Gestapo even forced a man to place his own father’s corpse into the furnace; he had no choice but to do it for fear of his body being next inside the furnace. As they were evacuating camp in the rail cars, the Gestapo ordered the men to throw out the dead bodies, which they agreed to happily because that meant more space for the living, so they threw the bodies out as if they were nothing, like “a sack of flour” (Wiesel 99). The orders to witness and commit heinous acts allowed the prisoners themselves to fall victims to accepting them and refusing to prevent them for fear of
(Wiesel 59). One cannot deny that the prisoners were afraid of being caught by the SS and being killed at them at that moment. The prisoners have been starved for months if not years and those two bowls were left alone, but they knew if they even touched that soup trouble was going to happen. Their psychological needs were not important to them at that moment their safety on the other hand was their priority. Nevertheless, the argument is overstated because this portion of the book was saying what the prisoners did, not what they thought nor felt.
thousand went on strike on July 20, 1899 after months of planning to boycott ("William Randolph Hearst"). All of the other newspapers lowered their prices back to pre-war prices of 65 cents for 100 except Joseph Pultizer’s Evening World and William Randolph Hearst’s Evening Journal. At this high of a rate Newsies could not make enough for housing and food. The reason many newsies started protesting was because they believed that Pulitzer and Hearst were being greedy saying, "Ain't that ten cents worth as much to us as it is to Hearst and Pulitzer who are millionaires? well i guess it is.
Without food for so long, it was turning people mad to where families were mauling each other without question. Why would anyone kill a family member over bread? Because they were only focused on one thing and one thing only. Food and as much as they could get even in the smallest quantities. “That’s all we thought about.
Who do you imagine when someone says food insecurity or hunger? Do you imagine someone severely underweight? Or maybe children in third world countries because surely hunger isn 't here in the United states. But, in fact, hunger is here in the United States, the documentary A Place at the Table defines someone who is food insecure as someone who does not know where their next meal is coming from, they have no idea how to manage, find, or afford food.
One should do what is best at the patient’s request for humane, quick and painless dimes.” The above statement said by Dr. Jack is very true, as keeping people alive who are starving to death is inhumane. And what is the necessity to keep them alive against their wish though they had tolerated it since long and no improvements are resulted. The person suffering from this condition and his family members both have to suffer. Even their family members would wish that he might be relieved from this pain as they also cannot see their beloved ones suffering.
Military Nurse’s Dilemma Chi Tiet University of Michigan - Flint Nurses are a group of professionals who faces a variety of ethical dilemmas while working. Therefore, these dilemmas cannot only impact on their personalities but also affect their patients. However, ethical dilemmas are argumentative and difficult to deal with, so there is no “right” or “wrong” answer for them. In a military nurse’s dilemma, a military RN is ordered to force feeding a terrorist prisoner while he is undergoing interrogation, and the prisoner is on a hunger strike protesting. The nurse is torn, but fearing of reprisal if orders are disobeyed, so the nurse is appalled at the over-riding a patient’s wish by force feeding him agains his wish.
World hunger is a major problem going on in the world. It is happening all over the world it isn 't just happening in one place. The people that are going through world hunger can not help it. A big part of it is that they can not afford food or it is that they are living in a really poor part of the world where there are not any resources of food. World hunger changes many families lives and it would be awesome if we could be one to make a difference.
World Hunger affects a significant amount of people all around the world. It is an issue that everyone should be aware of. The future is bright but there are lots of steps left to figuring out a way to end world hunger. From my research, my intention is to inform the reader about what is hunger, what are the causes, what are the effects of it, where does it mostly occur, and how can we end it. Someone who is severely hungry is someone who is incapable of accessing food on a consistent basis.
The right to food is a human right. It is universal, acknowledged at the national, regional and international level, and applies to every person and group of persons. Currently, however, some 852 million persons throughout the world are seriously – and permanently undernourished, 815 million of whom are in developing countries, 28 million in countries in transition and 9 million in developed (―industrialized‖) countries. Furthermore, every five seconds, a child under ten years of age dies of hunger or malnutrition1 – more than 5 million per year.