Hurbert Law And Crime Essay

Hurlbert considers law a social structure which interacts and informs people-to-people relations, along with how the people and government coincide with the law; socially constructed law can therefor explain the unequaled power structures between corporate crime and other crime (2011). Considering law as a social structure ultimately leaves direct oppression and stratification of minority groups inevitable. “Social justice issues are dynamic and change over time with social conditions.” (Gerlach & Hurlbert, 2011, p. 66); Hurlbert and Gerlach elaborate on social issues such as the growing economical gap playing a key role in the change of laws. The unavoidable grouping of economical class deviation causes social theorists such as Marx to view society as competing for power and resources; Marx also argued that the owner class had economic power that could be used to influence state and governmental decisions, such as

Law is as Hurlbert states, evolving; it is developing with “struggle, activism, and social change.” (2011, p. 228). Society is beginning to narrow down on corporate crime, seeing it as a powerful societal disorder. Whether it be a prestigious corporate manager or a street crime, Foucault calls “Lawbreaking not an accident, but an unavoidable imperfection” (1975), and according to Hurlbert this ideology benefits the development of the law (2011). Past laws based on discrimination and prejudice leave only the privileged individuals having full access to the rights declared in what we now know as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948). Evaluating history can give someone a very broad understanding that laws have changed, and are changing due to socially constructed idealizations, and how law should achieve justice for the neediest in society (Hurlbert,