Hydropower dams are built to generate electricity from the energy of flowing water. While these dams can provide renewable energy and water storage for communities, they can also have significant impacts on the environment and the people who live near them. For Native American communities, the construction of hydropower dams has had significant impacts on their culture and heritage. In this essay, we will examine the ways in which hydropower dams have impacted Native American culture and heritage, as well as the efforts being made to mitigate these impacts. The Impacts of Hydropower Dams on Native American Culture and Heritage The construction of hydropower dams has had significant impacts on Native American culture and heritage. One of the most significant impacts has been the displacement of Native American communities. In many cases, these communities were forced to relocate to make way for the construction of dams. This relocation disrupted traditional ways of life, including hunting and fishing practices, which are often closely tied to cultural and spiritual practices. For example, the construction of …show more content…
As Kitson (2009) notes, "the hydropower projects, in many ways, represented a new form of colonization, as indigenous peoples were excluded from the decision-making process and bore the brunt of the social and environmental impacts of the dams" (p. 630). This lack of consultation and collaboration with Native American communities during the planning and approval of hydropower projects has been a significant challenge in mitigating their impacts. In fact, as Deloria and Lytle (2011) explain, "the United States government, which had a trust responsibility to protect tribal lands and resources, had approved the dam without consulting the tribal nations that would be most affected by it" (p.
Native Americans have a right to live on their own reservations. A major pipeline is about to made through their reservation. I know that the people are furious with this. The pipeline would destroy historic sites. I have proposed a solution to this problem.
Initial federal permits, and partnership with affected tribes, were treated as a “check the box” exercise. Nowhere was there a careful analysis of how much the Missouri River crossing threatened water quality and tribal treaty rights. Nowhere was there a thoughtful public discussion of whether a new major oil pipeline should be placed in a river providing drinking water to 17 million people. And one had to pore over hundreds of pages of technical data to learn that the original route of the pipeline crossed the river just north of Bismarck, N.D. — a capital city that is nearly 90 percent white — and was moved to Standing Rock only when regulators expressed concern over the risk of a spill to the city’s water
The pipeline is an issue of culture clash; How can a culture such as that held by the Standing Rock Sioux tribe and the Army Corps of engineers be compatible? The Standing Rock Sioux tribe has held certain locations with a very high level of respect in their culture for many years. They have considered this land to have special meaning, even though the United States government has legal ownership that doesn’t mean that the tribe threw out the cultural meaning they had associated with the land just because they did not have legal ownership of the land. The notion of American property law is not considered as relevant to their beliefs regarding the land. This is not to say that the tribe is against American law, it is more to say that perhaps
As Native Americans are fearful that will lack clean water, they also fear additional problems. Their culture is disrespected and not taken accounted for. Many individuals protested to keep the pipeline project from finishing. Protesters been violated throughout expressing their freedom speech. In the article, “Here’s What’s Happening with the Dakota Access Pipeline Protest”, By Mahita Gajanan.
The debate in the early 1900s over the Hetch Hetchy dam showcased the uprising of citizens deemed as protectionists, such as John Muir, and how they differed from conservationists, such as Gifford Pinchot. The arguments and results of this issue are still relevant today, as there is currently a debate concerning whether or not to restore Hetch Hetchy to its former glory. Gifford Pinchot supported the building of the dam because he was a conservationist. This means he believed the dam could be a beneficial natural resource because it would provide water to San Francisco. He opposed protectionist views, like Muir’s, in the reading “Giving a Dam!” and refuted preservationist’s policies.
With population growth also comes schools and road systems, which often entails a permanent settlement. In terms of the Yellowknife Dene tribe, many of these institutions were built on land that they called sacred. These permanent settlements meant the loss of harvestable land for the Dene First Nation tribe as well as loss of hunting and fishing sites. Events such as these can cause serious social implications in terms of how the community functions as a whole. As in many aboriginal communities, the tribe members work together as a cohesive community.
There were many situations that the laborers had to conquer and get over with to build this and preserve this dam. The Yuma Project was an importance of people for a long time for different groups. The project would cause a big impact throughout Yuma’s population. The Yuma History sympathizes the three main cultures of Hispanics, American Indians, Anglo America.
These Indians struggled to adapt to these new homes and the city life. Relocation centers were made to offer help to these Indians and brought cultural awareness and social services for them. The outcome led to a growth of Native American activism and a sense of
western expansion affected native American lives in so many ways, it would take a book to say it all. So just to mention a few. It affected there way of life. It affected what they believed in from there traditional teachings. They saw everything change when they couldn't figure out why they were treated so bad after they welcome everyone that landed.
The Seneca Nation used the Treaty of 1794 to fight for their land, but encountered Eminent Domain. And although alternatives to Kinzua Dam were explored, they were also rejected because the United States couldn’t exchange taking the land of one people for taking it from others. Thus, when the land was taken, the Seneca Nation was forced to exchange their lifestyle for a new one.
The American society should strive to obtain higher standards of respect for the majority as well as the minority communities. There are not many people who are aware about the controversy and issues that the use of reclaimed water at the Snowbowl has created. Yet this disrespect to Indigenous belief has a long path in American history and Native American people. Indians were stripped of their land in 1829 because of the Homestead Act, which granted white people the right to claim up to 160 acres of land as their own. Even as the Constitution states that “all men are created equal”, Native Americans have faced discrimination, oppression, and racism due to their culture and skin color.
From the time American children are able to go to school, they are taught, that the US government has always been and is the one main group that the citizens of the United States can trust with everything, but as time has passed, what has happened to this trust bond and why? The government has a lot of influence on today’s society and their decision making processes, such as the Dakota Access Pipeline, the Great Planes Expanse, Border patrol, job creations, and government spendings are all huge parts in today’s dispute over whether or not to go through with it. The Dakota access pipeline, if it is gone through with, it is going to go through sacred Native American burial grounds but, this pipeline will boost today’s economy and create more jobs.
Since the Transcontinental Railroad was created, the Native Americans land and culture was impacted by the Western Expansion. People thought the railroad was a positive thing because it improved transportation and communication, but many Native Americans were harmed because of it. During the years of 1850 to 1890, the Native Americans were forced off their land because they were in the way of the making of the railroad and the discovery of gold. Also, Americans broke the treaty of Fort Laramie, caused the Battle of Little Bighorn, and lost many lives because of their selfishness for the gold. In addition to that, Native American’s culture changed throughout time.
The policy had a significant impact on Native American communities, as it resulted