Carl Jung defined an archetype as something that keeps on recurring over the course of time and is, in fact, any character, action or situation that represents the universal pattern in human behaviour (Headlee, 2014). In this essay I will be explaining the structural archetype of Birth, Death and Re-birth by stating how this applies the novel I am David by referring to how David discards his old life as a prisoner, the difficulties he has to face and how he reaches self-actualization. One of the most common situational archetypes is that of Birth, Death and Re-birth. With this archetype the protagonist encounters a problem or faces a struggle that leads to self-actualization. The character transform in a way where he or she moves away from their …show more content…
After David eats an orange for the first time, he becomes frustrated with himself because he doesn’t know anything about the world outside the concentration camp saying: “I don’t know anything! How can I stay free when I don’t even know what everybody else knows!” (Holm, 1965). David being ignorant about life outside the concentration camp, leads to him learning new things about the new word around him and this initiates the start of David’s rebirth as a new person. Near the end of the novel David reaches self-actualization. When he is held against his will and forced to work on a farm, David accuses God of being cruel, but as he sits and reflects about his life, he realizes that he himself has also been cruel: “He had said God was cruel like Carlo and the farmer…when perhaps God just wanted to teach him where his own fault lay! He had been cruel himself.” (Holm, 1965). When one considers the above-mentioned statements, it is clear to see that I am David fits the structural archetype of Birth, Death and Rebirth based on how David moves away from his old life and becomes a new person because of the difficulties he
hope has faded away, david became a robot showing no emoiton but inside was fighting between fear and anger/ at night no longer dreamed/ the words hope and faith just became words with no meanings/ didnt care if he was beaten.. eating was his only survival and ate whenever he could pg.135 david finally= family slave by summer 1972.. brothers treated him as one he became the hitting magnet and dad lost faith in david because david had to be on mothers side because she was the one who fed him pg.136 hate was all that was left in david, he hated himself more than anything; he felt its his fault because he let it go on.. and let it go on for so long every beating or starvation was all one just big game to catherine, it brought her joyment and somehow never felt guilty.. even stabbing him; no guilt pg.75 after all kids were asleep david was called to drink ammonia, david non educated did not think this was bad so drank it.. seconds later fell to the ground reaching for
(Rehman, Kazmi, Perveen, 2016). David towards the end of his story began to think that death was the only way he could escape the abuse. David’s story is the story of many other children around the world who suffer from physical, emotional and mental abuse, these children are in search of a light in the darkness for many years and David’s light in the darkness was his father in the beginning of the book but that drastically changed further on.
When he returned “his re-education camp had blinded him” as if he was brainwashed and had no life left in him, portraying
However, looking beyond what is initially shown, a new context can adhered to the plot. Carl Jung’s theory of archetypal patterns delves into the human psyche by analyzing its parts. According to Jung, the human mind is split into three different parts; the ego, the personal unconscious, and the collective unconscious- which can be split into many different archetypes that impact personality (McLeod). Oates uses archetypes and symbolism to show the battle of a young girl trying make her own home and identity in a world that
As of that, the prince decides to kill him to prevent him from marrying his beloved which causes the death and rebirth archetype because after a while Inigo Montoya hears him scream and he calls it the torture of all time like the one he sounded like when his father's dead. Therefore, he goes and tries to save him, but it's too late. Eventually, they find the miracle man who offers them a potion to make Wesley alive again or his rebirth. All of these are examples fit the situational archetypes category. Next, character archetypes follow.
Persistence is the view that persons have psychological continuity, thus, a person is the future being that inherits the mental features from that person. A person is also the past being whose mental features they have inherited. Olson refers to this question of persistence as the “traditional problem” of personal identity. The question of persistence asks what is essential and adequate for a person existing at one time to be identical with something present at another time. Therefore, Olson believes that contemporary philosophers think an answer to this question would resolve all there is to know about the metaphysics of personal identity (“An Argument for Animalism”, 613).
In the beginning of the story, David was a timid, quiet boy who would have preferred to have stayed home with his mom in Chicago. “‘I don't want to sleep in a tent.’ He said, and his voice broke with the simple honesty of it, and his eyes glazed”(Pg 416) He says he doesn't want to sleep in a tent and begins to break down almost.
This shows the change David has made with his views and choices. In the beginning of the book, David wished for extra arms as a harmless joke only to realize that making that joke costed him and got beat by his father. David then kept quiet as he didn’t want to express his own feelings due to trauma he has suffered. By the end of the book, David runs away with his friends in protest to his father’s rules and to express who he truly is. From the beginning of the book to the end, David has shown examples of him changing who he is as a person for the better.
According to Carl Jung and Joseph Campbell archetype is a recurring pattern of images, situations, or symbols, found in the mythology, religion, art, and dreams of cultures around the world. There are many different types of archetypes. The lover archetype is one of them. This archetype governs all kind of love from parental love, to friendship, to spiritual love. These archetypes are often known as partner, friends, intimate, sensualist, enthusiast, or a team builder.
The three texts, Oedipus The King, Aias, and Philoktetes, define an identity as the uniqueness of a character such as the strength and skills, the representation of that character to other people, and the true heritage. However, an identity one spends his life to build can fall apart within a second by any illness, action, or sudden revelation who they actually are. Aias, Oedipus, and Philoktetes’ carelessness in identifying with their reputations and actions lead their individualities to shatter and change. When Aias, Philoktetes, and Oedipus are forced to undergo destruction or alteration of their identities, they use their physical suffering to cope with the psychological distress of losing their identities.
For many years, the issue of self-identity has been a problem that philosophers and scholars have been to explain using different theories. The question on self –identity tries to explain the concept of how a person today is different from the one in the years to come. In philosophy, the theory of personal identity tries to solve the questions who we are, our existence, and life after death. To understand the concept of self-identity, it is important to analyze a person over a period under given conditions. Despite the numerous theories on personal identity, the paper narrows down the study to the personal theories of John Locke and Rene Descartes, and their points of view on personal identity.