FRESH EYE NEVER HURTS
Reasons why you need a second opinion in Cancer
Cancer diagnosis most often comes with an element of shock followed by denial, which is followed by anxiety; partly due to the absence of visible symptoms, and partly due to the fact that the patient or his family is just unable to emotionally cope with a sudden diagnosis of such a critical illness. In such a state, it is likely that one wants to take an opinion, from another expert to be fully convinced. There is also fear of the suggested line of treatment – chemotherapy or radiation – that drives one to wonder if their primary doctor might be wrong; or if there is an alternate line of treatment that he is failing to consider.
Besides ‘hoping against hope’, are logical
…show more content…
With the concept of second opinion in India, gaining traction only in the last few years, many still wonder if it is okay to go for it. The most common doubts would arise around whether or not their primary medical practitioner might be fine with them, approaching another doctor. Is he really the best specialist for cancer treatment and oncology? Would he take offence? Would he know the second doctor personally, and would they talk? Should I, or not, disclose my decision to take second opinion? For those of us having such questions, here are some reasons why taking a second opinion might be helpful for the …show more content…
They are in-charge of choosing the treatment that best fits the case and implementing it in the best environment. However, the success of treatment often depends on how emotionally strong the patient is. Your second opinion giver could offer relevant guidance, proof-points and cases which contribute positively to the patient’s wellbeing, and give them strength to undergo the cancer treatment. Further, they could also identify risk factors such as genetic makeup, lifestyle triggers or possible pathogens that could’ve caused the cancer – and suggest preventive measures as applicable, for the family members who might also be under risk.
While on one side, as a result of lifestyle changes cancer is becoming increasingly prevalent in our country, on the other, we have access to best-in-class medical and biomedical advancements that have drastically reduced the suffering involved in cancer-care. With the patient’s wellbeing as the foremost priority, doctors and other medical/ nursing staff today, are methodically trained to help patients take treatment effectively, manage side-effects and
These days’ patients can either opt out of treatment or health care options in general because the healthcare system has undergone so much scrutiny for many incidents that still go on, because there’s not a day that goes by without see these drug compensation commercials. Compensation for patients whom have suffered the side effects of drugs that were tested on them with vague explanations of how it would work, and we see human beings die off of such careless inhumane acts. Patients should be constantly reminded of their rights, like how the police read one’s Miranda before they arrested it should be the first thing a care giver makes sure his or her patient knows before they agree to any type of treatment that just
With these patients come high emotional roller-coaster, wanting to know as much as possible. As a soon to be Sonographer we are taught not to relay any information we view. Not even at the slightest bit. Sonographers act under the direction of
The diagnosis of cancer can have an enormous impact on a cancer patient mentally. A cancer diagnosis can be shocking to some patients. " After you
The thesis of this chapter states that in certain situations, it is crucial to listen to a medical professional, however, in others, it is very important to listen to yourself and also to do what you feel is right. The author of Complications," Atul Gawane, has written this specific chapter to persuade the reader of his thesis. If the choice you make is incorrect, then it could potentially be a matter of life and death. Atul Gawande gives multiple examples of patients that have made wrong and right decisions to prove his point. He uses the personal anecdotes of four different people, with four decisions to prove his point.
The situation could be addressed through the informed shared medical decision, which though has its limitations. Val Jones (2012) notes that the idea of the informed shared medical decision is “as old as the Hippocratic Oath”, but its widespread adoption would “create an extra layer of bureaucracy” (Jones, 2012). In order to understand the validity of this claim, it is recommended to take a look into the innovation. The main idea underlying the informed shared medical decision is that patients should be informed by independent consultants who would help them to make more accurate decision regarding medical interventions. It is suggested that experts hired by a health insurance company or government agency are more objective in their recommendations,
The patients I have worked with have become my greatest teachers. I can’t sit down and flip to a chapter in a textbook that would teach me how to listen to a patient and let their unique history paint the picture of their present illness. A physician that I shadowed told me something that has since resonated with me. She told me how every patient has a story, and you always need to listen carefully because these stories aren’t pointless, they often can lead to your diagnosis. I personally believe the most important member of the care team is the patient; without communicating with the patient there is no chance to obtain crucial insight as to the illness that is presented to you.
From what is said about this questionable doctor, no good could have ever come
Despite her disease progression nine months status- post surgery and three months after chemotherapy the treating oncology team was reluctant to discuss the risk/benefit aspect of chemotherapy and did not consider the option of palliative care in the face of progressive ascites and pleural effusion. Despite her continued decline the palliative care team offered her second-line of aggressive chemotherapy. This makes one wonder is this just bad medicine or is it seriously unethical? A wide range of medical and ethical issues arose in the provision of palliative care for this patient. This exemplified the need for patient’s autonomy, beneficence versus non-maleficence and truth telling.
The observation was undertaken by two Observer One (the author) and Observer Two (an ex clinician
I believe that unless a patient has explicitly said that they do not wish to be told bad news, it is a doctor’s duty to tell them the truth. This provides the patient with the most respect for a person and their autonomy. It also allows the patient to make important decisions regarding their own health, relationships, and finances. If the news is very bad, the patient can then decide to reconcile with estranged family members/friends, have the time to write a will, and settle any unfinished business. If the news is not so bad, the patient can decide what treatment path, if any, they wish to
Each morning patients came in for assessment and the treatment team developed or altered existing treatment protocols. I longed to be part of this team, working to stabilize each patient so they could return home to pursue their goals. The nurses stood out to me as the team members at ground zero in the unit, working directly with patients, and advocating for them in meetings. As a Nurse Practitioner, I will provide this same standard of holistic care to my patients, taking into consideration their biological, social, psychological and cultural needs while developing and implementing treatment decisions.
Not only do you need to focus on the wellbeing of your patient, but the patient
You wanted my side of the story, I’m just giving you background,” I explained. Let me tell you, I’ve been to lots of Docs over the years, and they are all so impatient. They ask you a question and they need you to answer just that and they want your answer right then. They don’t like extra info. Just what they ask you.
Doctors and physicians have more and better knowledge than normal people about human body and they are able to assist their patients while making tough decisions. However, they can not always make the right decision. Doctors can not predict the result of a surgery or a treatment and they do not have enough confidence of the result because sometimes the surgery could go in a way they didn’t expect. Although patients have the right to decide their treatments, doctors and patients should share
As Aristotle once said “Quality is not an act, it is a habit”. I am proud to say that here at King Hussein Cancer Center, excellence and high-caliber service are the cornerstones of our fight against cancer. Our dedication to quality and safety is guided by our strategic vision and evidenced by our achieved successes. The years 2012 and 2013 especially illustrate our accomplishments as they have far surpassed anything we have attained before; from ground-breaking research and cutting-edge technology to our regional and physical expansion and national successes.