Many citizens in democratic Latin American countries live under oppression and poverty. Like many other countries in the world, these countries have had revolutions, economic depressions and bad governments. Yet in countries like in Mexico things have not change. Its citizens are aware of the current economic depression, the government’s corruption and violence. Since Mexico mostly all Latin American countries are free or partly free, with the exception of Cuba, people elect their government officials. Yet they are aware of the incompetence of their own government and eventually instead of changing the government, citizens keep voting for the same type of government. a speech by political scientist Gloria Alvarez given at the first Ibero-American …show more content…
This ten minute speech is given at the first annual Ibero-American Youth Parliament which explains why the speaker would want to target young people. Gloria Alvarez gives this speech in front of other political scientist, activists and other professionals, so she makes sure to use a formal language in order to bring credibility and understanding to her speech by using words such as “demagogy”, “dismantle”, “Maslow Pyramid” and “Republic”. The purpose of this speech is to persuade people from keep voting for populist governments. She began by explaining the meaning of populism, and that its main goal is to make people believe that they need from someone else to have a better way of life. She gave the example of Cuba, a country which is not free but many other Latin American countries praise (Venezuela and Guatemala) because its government provides free public services. So this people fail to see that people in this countries are taken from their basic human rights like freedom of speech, access to quality education and health services, and more. So that is why according to her, voters should get rid of populist governments by becoming aware that before all the immediate material things a political candidates can offers, people must thing on the long term rights and opportunities that will be …show more content…
Since Gloria Alvarez is a political scientist, her remarks get more credibility. Also this speech took place at an annual parliament in where many ex presidents, journalists, activists, and political scientists of various Latin American countries gather to discuss various themes regarding its citizens, this means that this woman is a one that must maintain her own credibility. The second genera is an image published by the Wilson Center. Since these data graphs are based on the public’s opinion and not on the web site that published it, the image builds
She centers her argument on the representation and the politicization
She claims that women who pursue higher leveled jobs are hurting their families by not being there for them. Women can decide whether to vote or not and what to do with their own lives. They cannot be limited by others. Then she claims that in states that allow women to vote nothing gets done that women were fighting for. She believes that women should not have the right to vote because some women have not filled her expectation in the polls.
The French and Latin American Revolutions, two significant historical occurrences, aimed to overthrow repressive regimes and enshrine egalitarian and libertarian ideals. While both revolutions had similar goals, they had different outcomes because of their different socio-political environments. The Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen and the French Constitution, which supported individual liberties and a representative government, were products of the French Revolution, which was inspired by Enlightenment ideas (Source 1). As evidenced by the Haitian Constitution of 1801 and the Mexican Constitution of 1824, the Latin American Revolutions, including the Haitian and Mexican Revolutions, embraced the principles of racial equality and federalism (Sources 3, 6). We can learn more about the various paths and results by contrasting and comparing these outcomes.
The society nowadays consists of different jobs and people from different areas, but they were not like that in the late 1800s. Most Americans lived on farms. When things started changing for farmers from what they were growing to how they borrowed money due to the radical policies, consequences were brought to the farmers as the radical politics started changing farmer’s life. One of the consequences is that the farmers are no longer dependent on themselves. In earlier times, farmers grew their own food, made their own tools, and were generally self-sufficient.
To Americans and many others around the world, the U.S. is the face of what should be a “free society,” not including every society’s minor flaws. Maybe it’s because I’m barely entering the brink of my social awareness as a U.S. citizen or maybe is it more due to recent threats to our freedom as Americans, but now more than in the past decade or so, the media has brought the image of huge protests, riots, and demonstrations into the spotlight. And unfortunately, more often than not, many of these events result in violence, aggression, and opposition. Nonetheless, people’s intentions and visions of victory surely do not aim to end in chaos and harm to our societies.
Peron continues with the most disturbing statement of all, he speaks to the people of Argentina and tells them that the solution to opposition is to “answer a violent act with another violent act” (Peron 1). Peron’s authoritarian values began to show and became present throughout the rest of his rule. On the other hand, in a speech during his earlier years of power he continues to relish in the great ideas of Mussolini. He explains that to have an ordered population the form of government must be “the true people’s democracy [and], the true social democracy” (The Red Phoenix 3). Due to this speech, peron received much criticism from Argentina communists and socialists, who believes that the people should not have a vote.
There were many causes of revolutions in Latin America and Europe in the 1800’s. So many people around the world wanted change. What do the people do to get what they want? They force change and this leads to a revolution. The main man who stepped up for South America was Simon Bolivar.
The Populist development was a rebellion by ranchers in the South and Midwest against the Democratic and Republican Parties for overlooking their hobbies and troubles. For over 10 years, ranchers have experienced harvest disappointments, falling costs, poor promoting, and absence of credit offices. Numerous ranchers were in the red because of a dry spell that influenced the Midwest in the 1880s. In the meantime, costs for Southern cotton dropped. These calamities, joined with disdain against railways, cash loan specialists, grain-lift proprietors, and others with whom agriculturists worked together, drove ranchers to arrange a few different organizations.
HIS 1010 Name: Abdullah Ali Mohammed Madonna ID: 250490 Neoliberalism has occupied Latin America for over three decades. The neoliberalism eliminates tariffs and government subsidies of national industry and implementing national policies that favor the needs of business and investment. In this essay, I am going to discuss the issues that faced Latin America because of neoliberalism and how it brought harm to Latin America. Neoliberalism caused a loss in state revenue, so the amount which helped to fund the social welfare programs faced a loss. The regulations of labors were weakened, financial trading was deregulated, and the prices of agricultural products were no longer controlled by the state.
Populist Movement Success or Failure In 1892, a group of middle class farmers in the South and Midwest evolved creating what was known as the populist party. The populists came together to discuss how the government was ignoring the economic problems they were facing, creating lots of anger among the party, and resulting in the formation of the populist movement. Throughout this Movement, the populists were unsuccessful in ways of not accomplishing everything they hoped to receive in the future. If the populists were not completely successful in their Movement, then what did the populists receive from the revolt?
The Cosmic Race, by Mexican politician, activist, and intellectual Jose Vasconcelos, is an essay about a new race in Latin America brought about by the fusion of all other races and the society they will live in. It is an extremely influential essay in Mexico. The Cosmic Race says that America is the ancient home of the now lost Atlantean civilization (Vasconcelos 7). The subsequent Atlantean downfall spawned four races the Indian, natives in America, the Black, the Mongol, and the White (Vasconcelos 9). Latin America, already a racial melting pot, is in the perfect condition to .
With this statement, Fidel Castro is making a call to action for women to demand what they can achieve and gain high status and positions in society, implying they should pursue this revolutionary values to achieve a truly communist country, where all members of society are viewed and treated as equals; as in the Soviet Union. He takes advantage of the occasion, the
She also mentions that women’s rights should be equal to Human rights. This speech was given at the United Nations Fourth Conference of Women on September
She also states that no state can deny women the right to vote because everyone is a person and half the population should not be discriminated based on who they are. The repeated use of the word oligarchy in the second half of the speech gives the word a very bad connotation since it talks about people ruling other people, even though everyone is born equally. The word oligarchy has a bad connotation since it means a small group of people
Throughout time, the concept of “democracy” has been misunderstood and misused by the majority of governments around the world. In the Ecuadorian case, despite suffering innumerable dictatorships in command of several presidents such as José Maria Velasco Ibarra or Guillermo Rodríguez Lara, democratic ideas have prevailed and continue to evolve through the history and through the time. In fact, nowadays democracy is the principal political system in this country, in which the notion of popular sovereignty can be recognized. However, it is not clear what kind of democracy the Republic of Ecuador has. So, in order to clarify what was said before, it will be taken into consideration: (1) the definition of democracy according to three important authors, (2) the principal characteristics of a democracy and the two main types of democracy: (3) direct and (4) representative.