Olivia Rocha
Robert Hines
History 1301
August 2, 2023
Activism Provoking Change for Black Americans
Once the ending of slavery took place in 1865, a new epidemic struck Black Americans, lynching. Lynching is when white mobs capture these black individuals and then commit brutal tortures and death on these victims. It did not matter if you were a Black woman, a Black child, or an innocent Black man, they were all victims of this disparity. These actions were either hushed away by the white people or were not counteracted with justice because those who interfered could also be lynched. However, a Black American woman named Ida B. Wells fought to uncover these incidents and inform her community of this destruction. She began seeking out anti-lynching
…show more content…
Wells began investigating lynchings. With this, she revealed crucial information that would soon be accessible to the public. To understand her sources, she traced back to the original locations of the victims' deaths. She also found it resourceful to get the stories from the family members of the victims and those who had witnessed the incident. Wells was mostly intrigued by the idea of "venturing into the taboo realm of sexuality," which would lead her to understand one of the major causes of these lynchings (Myrick-Harris, pg. 97). During her investigation, she found that the victims that were tortured and murdered for rape, had a low probability of even committing this crime because "rape had never been alleged in two-thirds of the lynchings." Wells found that those who claimed rape were usually white women that were caught having affairs and needed to find any way to cover up this incident. When these discoveries were published in Wells's newspaper, many different reactions occurred. The white supremacists were furious about this alternative information. They became so belligerent that they destroyed her office and "promised to lynch Wells if she returned" (Myrick-Harris, pg. 97). Meanwhile, others felt more surprised that this was a major reason for the lynchings. This finding might have helped ease the guilt of the victim's family and assisted them with their grieving. …show more content…
Wells produced. Yet, I still find a sense of passion to educate myself over preceding issues and find ways to help in-need communities. In the present day, the United States still faces injustices among many communities, including the homeless, religious minorities, wildlife, Native Americans, LGBTQ individuals, Transgender youth, still amongst the black community, and many other minorities. I feel passionate enough about all these issues and have even used my sense of activism for these causes. In previous academic courses, I had the opportunity of researching and writing essays about some of these injustices. Even in my local community, I had the chance to participate in protests and events to show my support. I have attempted to actively work for these causes in the tradition of Ida B. Wells. In addition, I have focused my attention on the present issues in the Transgender community. To the best of my knowledge, I have attempted to educate myself about the injustices these individuals face, the laws that will affect their livelihoods, the statistics of homelessness in Trans communities, and other predominant issues that infiltrate their community. In the present day, Americans of many backgrounds face discrimination and injustices, and I feel that it is our job to educate ourselves on these problems and combat them in many ways, just like Ida B.
The cry has also been associated with various effects, and this is because the lynch law was being implemented at any time wherever the concerns was linked to the Afro-Americans. The fourth chapter of the book is “the malicious and untruthful white press.” This is a chapter of the book that covers how the white press was spreading lies about the Afro-Americans at the time.
Martinsville had been suggested to be an all-white town that had known KKK organizations. Therefore, when police investigated the murder, they saw finding the murderer to be an unimportant task due to the color of Carol Jenkins. They also saw no reason to find a murderer because they assumed the murdered to be white and were trying to be lenient of the situation. 4.)
Ever since the murder of Mary Phagan, which occurred on April 26, 1913, there has been a lot of discussions of who may have called the sweet, little Mary Phagan. Could have it been the black man, Jim Conley, or was it the white, Jewish man, Leo Frank? Did the killer get away with murder, or was justice served through the act of lynching? During this time, no one could have convinced another person that Jim Conley indeed killed Mary Phagan, but that Leo Frank was the definite killer in the eyes of the people. The point that everyone can agree upon is that the murder of Mary Phagan could never be forgotten.
Through the account of the murder of Henry Marrow, raised an awareness and hatred due to segregation and discrimination of race that caused a civil rights
Did you know that in 1882 to 1968, there were almost 4,000 people lynched that were black and about 1,000 lynched that were white? In the twentieth century a muckraker, by the name of Ida B. Wells, reported on similar Lynch cases. Ida B. Wells was an African-American journalist in the twentieth century, also called a muckraker, who wrote articles about lynching and led an anti-lynching movement. She changed America socially, morally, and economically through her investigative reporting. Ida B. Wells changed America socially because her speaking out inspired African-Americans to raise their voices and to create new protests due to the strong influence she had on them.
There have been many cases revolving around lynching. For instance, the famous case of Emmit Till, a young African American boy brutally murdered. Before the murder, Till decided to whistle at a white woman named Carolyn Bryant. Consequently, little did Till know that the funny joke of a whistle would cause him great misery and agony. On the night of the tragedy, two men, Roy Bryant, and J.W. Milam, went to Till’s granduncle's house looking for Till.
The issue of lynching in America became such a popularized crime due to it being justified for an accusation of things such as murder, robbery and arson, many were even lynched without being accused. In her influential book The Red Record published in
Wells had the courage to write articles condemning the lynching of her friends and the wrongful deaths of other African Americans bringing to attention the unfairness of the government and society at that time.
Throughout the South, Wells was able to discover that in most cases there was never a violent act towards a white woman and it was simply an excuse for murder. By communicating this message with factual evidence she was able to spread the anti-lynching campaign and raise more attention for the cause. Without her investigations and speeches lynchings could have easily been sweeped under the rug and a cycle of violence could’ve continued across the
To start the lynching process, white community usually made up a false situation accusing mainly black men of a crime they most likely did not even commit. Because of this the bystanders or the surrounding crowd started to believe the white group and proceed with the lynching act. While seeing this cruelty, Ida B Wells knew that she had to do something to bring justice to these black men. This situation shows how unfair and biased the overall community was against black people. Also, how hard it would be for anyone to stand up against these ‘powerful’ men at that time.
Although she hired a lawyer and sued the Chesapeake and Ohio railroad for discrimination, she lost her case in 1887.” This states that she stood up for her race and tried to speak out against it. My opinion of this story is that it was a great was to learn about one of the several colored people who took a stand against people
"Every negro in the South knows that he is under a kind of sentence of death; he does not know when his turn will come, it may never come, but it may also be any time" remarked John Dollard regarding the uncertainty in many African-Americans minds if they would live to see tomorrow or end up just another victim of racial violence. Between the years 1882 and 1951, 4,730 people were lynched in the United States (Robert A. Gibson, 1), and many died from other forms of racial violence and race riots. Lynching and Racial Violence effected the civil rights era through the lives of African-Americans, Lynch Mobs, and the Anti-Lynching Campaign. Many African-American's lives changed in the last decade of the 19th century due to lynching's or the
Wells uses logos to state the horrific facts regarding lynchings from 1882-1893 in her effort to get organizations to protect the constitutional rights of Black People. Wells writes “that less than one-fourth of the persons hanged, shot and burned by white Christians were even accused of the usual crime--that of assaulting white women. ”(Wells 5). The usage of Logos supports the author's purpose because the author uses facts to support her argument and urge for government action. The misrepresented lynching statistics are used by the author to demonstrate that the victims of the lynch mobs were largely innocent; only one-third of lynching victims were convicted of rape.
I had known about lynching before this book however Dr. DeGruy goes into detail about the horrific acts. She explains how men that went though no legal process were brutally beaten burned and lynched simply because they talked or looked a white women or simply just stood up for them self. Its disgust me that people would take pictures and treat a lynching like a joyful ceremony. It is disturbing to think that another man would cut off another man 's body parts and keep them as a souvenir. This really made think about the atrocities that were committed in our country that no one has paid
In Suzanne Lebsock’s A Murder in Virginia, 2003, the judicial proceedings of a court case are depicted after a women, Lucy Pollard, was found brutally slain in her own backyard. Most would think this to be a simple illustration of a murder trial, but this case comes with a twist. The twist is that the murder took place in rural Virginia in 1895. This is a time period that is characterized as post Reconstruction but before the implementation of the Jim Crow Laws. Being a Confederate state shortly after the Civil War, one would believe that race relations in Virginia would be extremely tumultuous, but this case just happens to fall in a small window of time in which relationships were surprisingly harmonious.