I could identify the families’ communication pattern by noticing two key aspects of their communication, first were they were high or low conversation families and secondly are they high conformity or low conformity families. For instance, High conversation families talk about all subject matters and they believe that open and frequent communication is essential to an enjoyable and rewarding family life. They are also spontaneous and full of life. Whereas, low conversation families view talking as frivolous and tend to be quiet families. I next looked for conformity orientation, which is the degree to which families believe that communication should emphasize similarity or diversity in attitudes, beliefs, and values. High conformity families use their interactions to highlight and enforce uniformity of thought. …show more content…
Whereas, High conformity families believe that diversity is key and they believe that friends and family are equal. Anyhow, I choose Breaking bad, I placed them in the low conversation and high conformity, which makes them a Protective family since protective families are low in conversation but high in conformity, and to me this is how the family in Breaking bad acts. My family communication pattern is high conversation and conformity, which is the consensual family communication pattern. No, I am not satisfied with our family type of communication since it always puts family first and it feels somewhat restrictive. However, since I am an adult, I can modify my pattern of communication, so that is a
Here Logan Feys claims that we have this pressure on us to conform to standards set by society. I agree because we are constantly being pushed into this mold by society to be somebody that we simply aren’t. Family is a great example of the pressure of conformity.
Many families have different relationships and feelings towards each other. Depending on the patterns of interactions among each other, or through their roles and relationships that they have helps to form their interactions. Family experiences can be different for each member and they may have different perspectives. Family dynamics can be helpful and healthy, and also can take unhelpful and unhealthy forms.
In this book the topic of conformity and
Over the past two weeks our class has been reading the book Ordinary People by Judith Beth. During the story the Jarret’s family dynamic communication affects all the characters because they all lack communication throughout the family and they are not able to talk about feelings or things that happen in everyday life. In the text Conrad was talking with Berger (psychiatrist and Berger “asked” How is [your] family life? [Conrad] responded by saying “me and my mother don’t get along She is very private and it doesn 't bother [me]”. (Beth,98)
Families have different patterns of communication and it can be brought to a romantic relationship or learn from it. All in all couples that experience conflict with family in younger years usually have a constructive style of conflict management and communication. Fowler, M., Pearson, J. C.,
One of the most significant advantages of conformity is that it can promote social unity within a group or community. When individuals conform to social norms and shared values, they are more likely to feel a sense of belonging to others in their group. This, in turn, can lead to greater cooperation and collaboration, which can be crucial for achieving common goals and addressing shared challenges. For example, in a workplace setting, conformity to a set of shared values and norms can help to build a sense of team spirit and foster a positive work culture. Similarly, conformity to a set of social norms can promote a sense of unity and shared identity among members of a particular culture or society.
In life, people have created conformities that people follow to keep everyone safe. For example, the world has laws that most people follow to avoid
The characters in Parenthood appear to be the evolving family for the 1990’s. The Buckman family is comprised of four different parts that include a Grandma, Grandpa, and Larry, the youngest child; Gill, one of the fathers; Karen, Gill’s wife; Kevin, Gill’s oldest son; Taylor, Gill’s only daughter; Justin, Gill’s youngest son; Helen, a single mom; Julie, Helen’s only daughter; Gary, Helen’s only son; Nathan, one of the fathers; Susan, Nathan’s wife; and Patty, Nathan’s only girl. This paper will address the Buckman’s evolving family, including the dynamics of change in the family and strategies for coping with change. The first family in the Buckman family is Gill and Karen.
Main Analysis The varieties in family structure are exposed in the television series Parenthood. The small families within the Braverman family give relevant examples of the change. Each of the children in the show has their own unique support system. All families prove relevance to prior research conducted on the topic.
She emphasizes the recognition of “cross-cultural” communication is beneficial to repair the conversational issues (Tannen 264). She proposes couples to improve their relationship by learning differences, adjusting conversational styles, and changing attitude. Learning differences is crucial to couples at the beginning of improvement, which helps couples to achieve mutual acceptance. Ideally, couples change their communication patterns according to their partners’ preference.
Over the years, mass communication has been defined in several ways. While some view it as a process, others perceive it as a skill. But apart from these two classifications, I particularly view mass communication as a tool since it is an essential device that can be used in one’s everyday life. It is an instrument all humans can make use of in delivering their intended messages to their family, friends and even to strangers. Charles Berger and Richard Calabrese suggested the same perception as they proposed their theory called the Uncertainty Reduction Theory.
Families are said to constitute realities in which most of one’s attributes are constructed, based on the family interactions, beliefs, values as well as the behaviours that are seen in the specific families one is brought up into (Archer & McCarthy, 2007). However, even though most of one’s personal characteristics may be heavily influenced by their families; people do have a sense of individuality that makes them unique from any other person in the family (Becvar & Becvar, 2013). Therefore, one may argue that it is these differences that may cause misunderstandings in families.
This may not be exactly what Dr. Montoya intended, but when I was reading about different styles of communication it brought to mind my entire relationship with my husband. Communication and the different styles we prefer have been an issue for us for many years so much so that ten years ago we both agreed to read the book, You Just Don’t Understand, by Deborah Tannen. Different terms were used in this book to discuss a similar phenomenon. Where Ting-Toomey and Chung’s book discusses high context and low context cultures, Tannen, discusses metamessages and social roles between men and women.
Family members may or may not be biologically related, share the same household, or be legally recognized” (Raney, 2015:6). In the series Modern family, it shows the dynamics of a 21st century family and how traditions and culture has evolved over the years. As opposed to “nuclear family” “No longer does the traditional family consist of two parents and two children; instead, more diverse and shifting family structures are becoming the norm.
In essence, poor communication results in low self-esteem, which can trigger individual or familial maladaptive responses, especially in times of high stress. According to Satir’s review, functional families are having clear, complete, congruent communication in which there are clear roles and rules to govern family processes. A functional family is compatible with Satir’s notion of an “open system”, interchange of information and resources is clear within and without the adaptive and dynamic