Theoretical analysis of ig models: global practices and china’s proposal /approach
1. Introduction
1.1 Background and Research Questions
Internet governance is emerging as a leading issue in twenty-first century. Developing rapidly since its invention, the Internet has worked as the communication network connecting individuals, and is becoming the basic infrastructure of social and economic system. As a global distributed network, the Internet consists of millions of smaller interconnected networks, with great influences transcending national borders. Today, Internet governance has become a point of international conflicts, and a new arena for display of political and economical power. Therefore, it is necessary to rank the issue of Internet
…show more content…
Since China embraced the Internet in early 1990s, enormous academic efforts have been made on China's control over the Internet via diversified ways (Goldsmith & Wu, 2006; Hughes & Wacker, 2003; Kalathil & Boas, 2010). However, relatively little attention is paid to its role and action on Internet governance at the global level. The existing research has already gave up the early belief of a totally decentralized and uncontrollable Internet system as merely a myth (Goldsmith & Wu, 2006), which makes it possible to bring states back into analysis of Internet governance. Based on the analysis of current Internet governance models, China’s proposals of Internet governance can also be seen in the international arena. Emphasizing on cyber sovereignty and role of state, should it be counted as a new model? In this thesis, it will be …show more content…
Both current models, multi-stakeholder and intergovernmental models will be analyzed respectively through actors, scope and principles aspects. From each aspect, the key features of each model can be concluded. What is the power structure and interrelations between actors? What issues are covered in each model, and what are the most focal ones? Regarding the normative aspect, what are the common standards for the regime? How could it be assessed and situated in the political spectrum? Comparatively, both models have their characteristics, which will be summarized in a visualized
project week phase 1 block 6 How would you manage this campaign what are the different roles within your teams what are your milestones and planning of activities s47853 achara charles Strategic Social Media: My strategy is a high level plan to use social media to achieve one or more goals under conditions of uncertainty, which includes several subsets of skills including "tactics", siege craft, logistics etc.my team will use a comprehensive way to try to pursue political ends.it is important because the resources available to achieve these goals are usually limited. my team and I will use Strategic social media to generally involves setting goals, determining actions to achieve the goals, and mobilizing resources to execute the actions. A strategy describes how the ends will be achieved by the means . my team and i have to share information, pictures and videos to
In Network Neutrality Nuances, David Farber makes a contrasting counterpoint to Barbara van Schewick’s piece of net neutrality protecting us from abuse from our ISPs. Farber states that because the internet has always regulated itself over the course of its nature and is continuing to grow increasingly with no issues, we should continue to let the internet self-regulate. Thus David Farber is suggesting that the government and legislators take a reactive stance on the internet because over the course of the internet’s history it has shown to be growing exponentially. Farber continues to analyze the history of net neutrality and comes to the conclusion that any legislation that attempts to manage the internet will fail due to the incompetence of legislations regarding the internet as demonstrated by history. Farber attempts to inductively explain the pretense behind the legislations against net neutrality; however some of his examples ultimately fail to support his conclusion due to his very apparent position against legislators
This paper will give a closer look at the
Previous attempts to regulate the internet have failed because we assume we can predict how the internet will evolve, when that is not
This essay will examine the possible advantages and disadvantages of such a
With the world population being 7,259,902,243 people, a grossly huge amount of people use the Internet, the number being 3,366,261,156 people worldwide. That ends up being almost half of the population, the percentage being 46.4% I one hundred percent disagree with the “decision” of the government ridding of the Internet entirely, as if that isn't clear enough already. Though the government might find the termination of the Internet useful in some circumstances, I have no doubt that it may result in riots, violence, protests, and more in order to get it
He examines the previous occurrences of the history of the Internet in which the constant and sudden changes forced brief decisions from the government and the FCC to make decisions crippling the Internet. For instance, David Farber states the changes
One of the first questions for the paper about what it
Our thought processes, in short, begin to mirror the way a computer processes things in terms of efficiency and data processing. Today, it seems that almost everything is on or reliant upon the Internet. It is “becoming our map and our clock, our printing press and our typewriter, our calculator and our telephone, and our radio and TV,” Carr says (321). The Internet interconnects everything we do in the media age.
The Stakeholder Salience Theory, created by Mitchell, Agle and Wood, are based upon the combination of the three relationship attributes to generate general types of stakeholders. These attributes include: Power; Legitimacy; Urgency. “Stakeholder salience” is defined as the degree to which managers give priority to competing stakeholder claims. Therefore if a stakeholder consist of all three attributes, he/she/it will be of most importance and will have more rights and privileges than a stakeholder that consists of only one of the three attributes. As seen in the picture on the right, you can differentiate between the different types of stakeholders, according to where they get placed given the attributes they consist of.
Benefits and Challenges of Multi-Agency Introduction Multi-agency can be defined as the involvement of different corporations which works together to eliminate vital issues or problems in the society. The involvement of ranges of professionals in an integrated way provides a strong platform which helps to attain a positive outcome for the young generation and the children. The working in partnership the key element of multi-agency, therefore the working of the multi-agency is faces variety of changes, however the perspectives and approach of the agency is supported by the government to enhance social condition, education and health facilities (Atkinson, 2005). The main objective of this research paper is to identify the working process and to recognize the challenges in the working mechanism. Therefore, the main aim is to analyse and investigate the working mechanism and different models of multi-agency.
In Stephen D. Krasner’s, “Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables,” he defines what regimes are in relation to international politics as well as ascertaining their significance. Krasner compares and contrasts multiple scholarly viewpoints to determine if regimes have a noteworthy impact on international relations. Furthermore, he discusses the different building blocks for which regime development is built on. Krasner defines regimes as “sets of implicit or explicit principles, norms, rules and decision-making procedures around which actors’ expectations converge in a given area of international relations.”
The Internet includes commercial, educational, governmental, and other networks, all of which use the same set of communications protocols.” The Internet has rapidly taken over, not only the United States, but also in numerous other countries across the ocean. “There was an estimate of 3.5 billion
PERMA model The PERMA model of Seligman (2011) suggests that people are most happy when they experience positive emotions, engagement, positive relationships, meaning and achievement. Therefore Seligman describes a multimodal construct for which happiness can be measured from these 5 components (fig.1). The PERMA model predecessor was the “Authentic happiness model” of Seligman, in which he first described happiness consisting of three components: meaning, positive emotions and engagement (Seligman, 2003). In Seligman’s recent PERMA model, he states that happiness is a multidimensional subjective construct build up out of the five components.
Through the improvement of technology, we became reachable in an instant through the internet by the use of our mobiles, gadgets, emails, computers, television systems and more. All of these factors together are being integrated in our daily lives and it has a powerful social impact. New innovative