Imagery of Gardens in The Tragedy of King Richard II The Tragedy of King Richard II is one of Shakespeare’s plays which talks about leadership, particularly the causes of success and failure. In the play, Shakespeare gives an account where a leader rose to the position of a king thinking that it is God who has anointed him (Bevington, 2014). However, unlike the most likely expectation, this king, Richard II, engages in practices and a leadership style that ends up bringing more suffering to the people rather than helping them overcome the various challenges they faced. Throughout the play, Shakespeare traces how King Richard II rose to power, his style of leadership, and how this style ultimately leads to his failure (Bevington, 2014). To help the audience learn more about the leadership of England and its shortcomings during the reign of King Richard II, Shakespeare employs various styles, among them vivid imagery. This essay examines the use and importance of imagery of gardens used in the play. To begin with, Shakespeare uses the imagery of a garden to analogize the biblical Garden of Eden, describing the beauty of England. As we see from the speech of John of Gaunt, England was supposed to be a land that everybody dreamt of living in, but the reality is different because of poor leadership as that of King Richard II. This royal throne of kings, this sceptered isle, This earth of majesty, this seat of Mars, This other Eden, demi-paradise, This fortress
In the vignette, “The Monkey Garden,” Cisneros uses similes, personification, and juxtaposition to show how the garden quickly changes from a child’s playground to a place of haunting grownup memories. In the beginning, Cisneros uses similes to describe the carefree nature of the garden: “There were big green apples hard as knees. And everywhere the sleepy smell of rotting wood, damp earth, and dusty hollyhocks thick and perfumey like the blue-blonde hair of the dead" (Cisneros 95). Initially, Esperanza and the other children are young and naive and play in the garden without any worries. The garden is a place of childhood innocence and shows that although Esperanza wants desperately to grow up, she is still a child.
Lizabeth and the children “hated those marigolds”, those peculiar organisms “interfered with the perfect ugliness of the place” their beauty “said too much”; it “did not make sense” nor did the necessity to uproot “weeds” (Collier 8). The children, or the weeds, felt intimidated by these beautiful and loved marigolds. They feared the imbalance. Revenge was sought. Lizabeth and the children would destroy the flowers.
In chapter 12 of “The bean Trees”, Kingsolver shows the beauty of nature through her figurative language. Her descriptions of the natural landscape, show that the land embodies a life of a baby to an adult- from birth to death. Taylor falls in love with the Arizona’s desert land and sky, and her appreciation for nature is mirrored in the landscape that is in front of
Finally, the setting of Miss Lottie's garden, with its beautiful marigolds, represents a contrast to the poverty and ugliness of Lizbeth's surroundings. "For some perverse reason, we children hated those marigolds. They interfered with the perfect ugliness of the place; they were too beautiful; they said too much that we could not understand; they did not make sense. Perhaps we had some dim notion of what we were and how little chance we had of being anything else. Otherwise, why would we have been so preoccupied with destruction?"
For example, he describes its gloominess as a “fantastic farm where ashes grow like wheat,” which demonstrates a dismal feel in an ironic fashion through the contrasting imagery associated with growth and freshness. This tone is further expressed by the “ashes grow[ing] like wheat into ridges… and grotesque gardens,” which adds to the dreariness of
In Edward Abbey writings he talks his descriptive encounters with nature in the deserts mostly about the snakes that he is watching. Abbey has a love for the deserts and this is why he writes about “The Serpents of Paradise”. In this story he used a lot of detail to make it feel like you know what is constantly going on, it almost felt like I was their and could imagine in my mind every moment I read. The way Abbey writes only makes me want to just keep reading. Abbey uses his senses to describe what he is seeing like the greasy wings of the ravens and what they sound like pretending to talk to him.
The author, Voltaire, used this garden to show a biblical allusion to the garden of Eden. At the end of story, Candide gets a garden and cultivates it based on a recommendation of a Turkish Muslim which is ironic. The irony is that the initial garden was an allusion to Eden and the fall from grace while the final garden is still Eden but from the Muslim point of view. The castle is one of the most significant gardens because Voltaire portrayed it as the ultimate utopia that Candide gets kicked out of. Voltaire’s style and technique is shown when he starts with the fall from grace then end up in a garden like Eden is significant because it helps shape meaning for the reader in the
Friar Laurence says these lines during a monologue while he is attending his plants. The significance of this
Alice Walker uses imagery and diction throughout her short story to tell the reader the meaning of “The Flowers”. The meaning of innocence lost and people growing up being changed by the harshness of reality. The author is able to use the imagery to show the difference between innocence and the loss of it. The setting is also used to show this as well.
One of the major themes in the play Hamlet, by William Shakespeare, is deception. In Act I Scene IV, one of the characters, Marcellus, claims: “Something is rotten in the State of Denmark” (1.4.100). This is referring to the act of deception, where everything may look fine to the naked eye, but there are underlying problems occurring in the state of Denmark. In utilizing diction and metaphors, Shakespeare adds more depth to one of the major themes of the play. Metaphors are used by Shakespeare to compare Claudius to a deathly creature, while nobody realizes his mal intentions.
There is a use of an extended metaphor of the seasons in the speech. When Shakespeare uses the metaphor of a weak flower and then it becomes a “killing frost” (Shakespeare 6) might show how liable Wolsey is. The killing of the flower demonstrates the animosity Cardinal has, while the frost shows the king’s release of him and that it only took three days for the flowering. Line ten also portrays figurative language when they talk about the wanton boys. The boys soaring bladders is suppose to symbolize Wolsey is being grasped by the king, but has support for the people who are higher up that got him where he is at the moment.
These images show Wordsworth’s relationship with nature because he personifies this flower allowing him to relate it and become one with nature.
MIP Rough Draft The play “Hamlet” by William Shakespeare and the book, “The Handmaids Tale” by Margaret Atwood, both create a fall of power in society and this loss of leadership opens the door for corruption to take over. Both authors have created this instability in society and use the motifs: loss of power, religion, and relationships to explore characters’ innermost selves. This exploration of characters proves that one will submit to anything in order to obtain stability in a corrupt environment. Both Shakespeare and Margaret Atwood immediately pull the rug out beneath from the characters in their work, creating instability not only in the character’s mind but in the reader’s mind as well.
Was Richard III Evil? Richard III was a power hungry king in the play of William Shakespeare. During the beginning of the play Richard III represents himself as a self-made criminal; he makes his malicious intention known in every speech to the audience. Richard works his way up to the throne by murdering his rivals. Was Richard III evil?
Shakespeare really wrote tragedies of great heights and earned standard category. His one of the best creation Richard II is a historical play rather being a tragedy. The history play is usually distinguished especially by its political purposes from other kinds of plays. Shakespeare 's use of his sources shows that he wanted to emphasize the political issues involved in the conflict between Richard and Bolingbroke, mainly the privileges of kingship and the right of rebellion. The play is consequently written not about the down fall of its hero but around the chronological stages by which Bolingbroke threatens, captures, and retains the crown.