Imorality Of Humanity And Morality In Mary Shelley's Frankenstein

830 Words4 Pages
Immortality of Frankenstein
Recent advances in science have raised the question of morality in the world. How far will scientists go before experiments are deemed immoral? The novel Frankenstein by Mary Shelley, raises a question regarding the line between morality and immorality of scientific advances. Are such advances advantages or disadvantages? In fact, the novel Frankenstein reveals the immorality of the scientific advances of creating artificial life beyond the laws of nature.
The laws of nature are defined by two things, science and morality. Science is credited for a majority of our advances in health, and health care would not be where it is today without it. While science can cross the line of immorality, humans would not be able to live as long without certain advances. In Frankenstein, such advances were not up to par with what it is today. Back in the day, people would die of the common cold, flu, and other curable diseases. Without science, most humans would not only be dead, but most likely extinct easily due to an epidemic. In the article debating the advancements of science, it says, “The advancement of science has most definitely manipulated the progress of humanity over time, as is evident by the current lengths of people 's lives”. (2) Science has undoubtedly saves the lives of numerous people each year, and its advances are what keeps the human population alive and well. Overall, science has changed the way humans live, how humanity progresses, and
Open Document