The rapid rate of development in Malaysia has made the extent of deforestation by leaps and bounds. In Malaysia, the issue of deforestation cause by certain factors are at an alarming stage. It should has been given great attention by the government. To address these impacts, implementation of law in Malaysia must be a priority. However, the Malaysian constitution does not have an definite provision for the protection or conservation of the environment.[ Sarah Tan Yen Ling. [2013]. A Constitutional Environmental Protection For Malaysia: Some Possibilities, 1 LNS(A) xl ]
There is a problem whereby there is limited recognition of indigenous peoples’ legal and land rights by the government regarding to their native customary land. In Gua Musang, Kelantan, there is massive indiscriminate logging of trees seems to be the order of the day, with little replanting, and this has been going on for a long while. It seems as either there are no laws requiring logging companies to log responsibly by cutting only mature trees and do compulsory replanting or there is no proper enforcement of law in the federal and state government.[ Rani Rasiah (3 Mar 2015). Kelantan deforestation: State government must take responsibility. Retrived from https://aliran.com] In November 2016, the State Forestry Department stopped issuing permits to enter the forest reserve areas where the Orang Asli (original people) live, reportedly in response to the blockades in Kelantan. However, the forest is still
The white man’s dream is of new energy sources and industrial development however, the maps that the Indigenous peoples create of their territory gets in the way of this (Brody, 1981, p. 30). Indigenous groups have lost a lot of land that was once the center of their hunting and trapping systems due to the ignorance of settlers and developers of First Nations economic and cultural
The government eventually passed the native title in which stated that the laws and regulation for the courts follows in future claims. This had all happened in 1993. Many non- indigenous people did not understand why Mabo had put so much effort into all this when it was just land. They did not realize the issue that Mabo was stating, butF why would the non-indigenous people see a problem.
The High Court ruled that Indigenous Australians had a right to claim native title to traditional lands that were not legally owned by the
A prominent example is seen in the Royal Proclamation of 1763, which was meant to recognize Indigenous rights and protect their lands. Despite these intentions, however, shortcomings exist on behalf of the government regarding how it has fulfilled treaty obligations such as these over time. Although the proclamation acknowledged Indigenous territories and mandated negotiations for land cessions, many settlers persisted in seizing Indigenous lands without consent or agreements. Due to inadequate enforcement by the government, these encroachments flourished and often resulted in egregious violations against Indigenous rights and properties. The authority's neglect of the Royal Proclamation has been an underlying factor contributing to widespread legal injustices suffered by Indigenous peoples.
Essay Outline The human race that inhabited the lands earlier than anyone else, Aboriginals in Canada had conquered many obstacles which got them to what they are today. In the past, Canadian Aboriginals have dealt with many gruesome issues that primarily involved the Canadians opposing them or treating them like ‘‘wards.’’ The Indian Act is a written law which controls the Indian’s lives and it is often amended several times to make Indian lives either peaceful or cruel but especially, cruel. Aboriginals found the Indian Act a massive problem in their lives due to it completely controlling them and how they lived on their reserve.
This quote highlights the importance of Indigenous people having freedom from governmental control. It asserts that they should be able to have autonomy and control over their identities, lands, and communities
This further demonstrates the opposition of the government to indigenous people owning their own
The government has passed many conservation policies to protect animals, eco-systems, plants and trees itself and indigenous people’s way of life, but many of these policies get overlooked and require a lot of extra work. How it affects the rest of the world- This action is permanent, and all of the world is targeted as a potential setting for deforestation. It is predicted that the continuing action may result in very few rainforest across the entire globe. Cutting trees can also be harmful to our ozone layer, which protects earth from dangerous radiation.
The Tsilhqot People have been fighting logging issues since the 1980’s and are still fighting over other issues like mining since 2013 (The Star, Supreme Court Grants Land Title…, 2014). Not only did the Tsilhqot people have property issues arise from resource development but the Haida as well. The Haida Native group in British Columbia also protested and opposed logging on the Queen Charlotte Islands in 1985 (Centre for Native Governance, Haida, 2013). In 1987 the Province of British Columbia signed an agreement to give some land back however, it took six years to complete and during this time frame they continued their developments (Centre for Native Governance, Haida, 2013). Robert William, the Tsilhqot representative in this case, said
Cases in which land has been returned to indigenous owners have already been examined and brought to light. This happened in California's redwood forests. The trees were returned to their descendants and studies show their protection and care paid off. (Bearfoot, 2022) The land is richer in health and more wildlife inhabits it.
Introduction Eddie Mabo was the man who initiated the land rights argument for indigenous people. He found out that where he was born and lived, at a place called Mer Island was not legally his or his peoples land. This news angered and upset Eddie Mabo and he began speaking out and telling people about his story. It was while Eddie Mabo was working as a gardener at James Cook University that he crossed paths with land rights advocates and some legal minds who would become influential in his later argument to have the indigenous right to land recognised by the courts. He received a great amount of support especially from fellow Indigenous people.
While many environmental ethicists argue for the intervention and replanting of trees and relocating of species, First Nations perspectives believe that is not the way to deal with nature. Aboriginals have, as Bruce Morito highlights in his article titled “The ‘Ecological Indian’ and Environmentalism” a “sound and sustainable environmental ethic, painstakingly worked out over the course of thousands of years occupying this land” (238). To erase their language as the residential school system has is to erase the environmental ethic that Aboriginals have
Kofi Annan, once the seventh Secretary-General of the United Nations, stated, “If globalization is to succeed, it must succeed for poor and rich alike. It must deliver rights no less than riches. It must provide social justice and equity no less than economic prosperity and enhanced communication” (Kofi Annan). Persistently, the world is reminded of the advantages of globalization and how history could have been shaped without its existence. In spite of the declarations that defend the international movement enhancing the ideology of an interconnected planet, the downsides of globalization cannot be ignored.
The Brazilian Amazon is home to 40% of the world’s tropical rainforest. Incidentally, it also has the world’s fastest rate of deforestation. Tropical Rainforests around the world are lost at the rate of one acre per second with the average rate of Brazilian Amazon being such that 2 million hectares of forest land are cleared every year. There are multiple causes for this extensive rate of deforestation and this paper will address four such causes namely (1) rapid population growth, (2) industrial logging and mining, (3) changing spatial patterns of deforestation, and (4) wildfires. Moreover, there are several Brazilian state policies that encourage deforestation practices of which this paper will look at five key aspects – (1) taxes on agricultural income, (2) rules of land allocation, (3) land taxes, and (4) tax credit schemes and subsidized credits.
The rapid destruction of woodlands or removal of trees from forests is known as deforestation. Every year, vast areas of forests are cleared to make way for agriculture and development. Tropical rainforests play important ecological roles: 1. Rainforests are the oldest ecosystems on Earth and house almost half of the world’s flora and fauna. 2.