With the end of the World War I, the British Raj in India fell into crisis. The political situation of India was in constant disturbance. Because of the war a number of reforms were carried out in India which became one of the major reasons of colonial crisis in India. This paper will discuss what impact different reforms of the British Raj had on the politics of India, how the arrival of Gandhi changed the political scenario in India, how the Muslim league was affecting politics, and how these factors lead to the catastrophic partition of the sub-continent. Since the beginning of the Raj, the British imposed various reforms on the Indian population which continued to happen till the end of the colonial rule. In 1906, the Secretary of the …show more content…
To achieve this end he used the tactic of non-violent non-cooperation. His method involved passive resistance. Gandhi also supported the Khilafat movement, which was carried by the Muslims of India in 1919, to pressurize the British Raj and to protect the Ottoman Empire. He supported it because he wanted to oppose the social and economic policies which were imposed by the British. Because of the disappointment of the Rowlett act of 1919 Gandhi got the chance to introduce All-India agitation. He also opposed the act of 1919, by calling it “a ‘black act’ passed by a ‘satanic’ government” (Jalal and Bose, p. 110). The British’s hideous brutality of the Jallian wala Bagh massacre was unexpected for Gandhi. He was profoundly affected by this massacre and described it as “thinly disguised whitewash” (Metcalf and Metcalf, p. 169). Due to this massacre he lost his faith on the British’s good intentions and began the mass nationalist movements of 1920. It included the boycott of schools, courts, councils, and all the imported foreign goods. With the passage of time the movement continued with great participation from the masses, like the whole Punjab was against the imperial rule. The movement was very successful as Jalal and Bose have suggested, “the boycott of British goods and institutions was much more effective in 1921 than it had been in 1905” (p. 116) Another motive of non-cooperation was also to introduce native institution that could compete and replace the British institutions, to meet this end majority contributed money and some leaders like Tilak and Lalaji started their own institutions. The tension was thick between the Congress and the Government throughout 1921. The movement completely irritated the British as they did not know how to respond it. They could not throw Gandhi and his
They marched saying “we burn british cloth” British soldiers got a small group of indians and beat then until they saw the large group of marchers coming, they start running after them and threw their torches into the british buildings British soldiers came out and the Indians got violent towards them and they died. Because this contradicts the campaign Gandhi says the campaign needs to end “An eye for an eye only ends up making the world blind”gandhi says this to the people who tell him not to end the campaign (Jinnah and
Once the BEIC had control over India, they reshaped the government to better suit their needs. For instance, the BEIC required that natives couldn’t serve in “civil administration till they become Christian,” seeing that “no civil or military servant in India rises to a position of real influence or distinction.” (Document 15) Before the BEIC, India’s government was self-sufficient and flourishing. Laws were passed in response to problems that people were encountering, with the well-being of the people as the key objective. The BEIC was not taking into account the natives.
The British rulers of India helped settle 500 million diverse peoples with different religions all over India during their rulership, providing stronger communities held together by values of religion (Paragraph 6). However, the people of India were given little to no responsibility of themselves and their own nation (Document 1). Meaning the British also created a great divide of the native people and the British imperialists get to dictate what taxes and laws exist, all of which to only better the lives of themselves and did not pertain to the basic human needs for the people who actually lived in India. Paragraph 12 shows that the British did bring several different states of India into one unified nation to help establish an effective justice system, civil service, loyal army, and efficient police force to protect the people of India. On the other hand, document 2 shows that the Indians had no say in the taxes they had to pay to the British or how they spent their money as a nation.
He tried to clean the Indian society of the caste system. He later became the leader of the Indian National Congress in 1920. He participated in many non-violent protests to fight against the British. His resistance to colonialism is partnered by his powerful
Although, violently fighting the British may have eventually won India its independence, Gandhi choosing to be nonviolent caused India to learn how to do things on its own while still reaching its goal of actually being independent from the British significantly faster. Gandhi’s use of nonviolence was because he didn't want to hurt anyone, he just wanted India to be independent. Going to jail gained Gandhi attention, followers and respect, and lastly, Gandhi not seeing the British as his enemy contributed to a more peaceful way on how to gain India’s freedom. Gandhi doing this caused India to eventually gain it’s independence in
Gandhi people manage their anger and have peace against the British. He did this by creating a philosophy and encouraging people to follow that philosophy. Gandhi also used peace instead of violence against the British. Gandhi did this because he believed that he can achieve peace among everybody. Gandhi’s philosophy didn't work on everyone.
It was the imperialist rulers who caused the British and all the other people to see them, the British, themselves as the bad people and killers. Gandhi and his people never fought back once, the only single thing they did was not cooperate. And the British themselves did them the favor and got the people to turn against them by attacking and killing some innocent people and giving them jail
British rule over india as a colonial state was effective and precise in the eyes of British supporters, but it was only this way through its discriminatory measures, separating Indians as well as creating conflict, and was thusly not in the benefit of India’s natives. At first glance, it may seem that Indians were advanced by the efficient rule which the colonists employed(Lalvani). However, this governing body was led by a tiny minority of native Indians, outnumbered 1 to 15 by British invaders( Document #2). This left them all but voiceless as the British installed drastic laws such as the Rowlatt Act, meant to disempower aboriginals by allowing the British to imprison supposed terrorists, meaning protesters, without a trial(Gandhi). Still, the British feared further revolt among Indians, and with so few of them there to enforce their laws they needed a police force staffed by the very people they sought to oppress.
Along with the government, Britain controlled the police force, denying the Indians a reliable source for help (Gandhi). This often led the people of India to bodily harm,
When Gandhi returned back to India from Europe in 1896 he was sickened. The British Raj had formally taken over, so he decided to make a change and stop the unfair treatment of everyone in India. As Gandhi said himself, “My ambition is no less than to convert the British people
British Imperialism in India More than 40 million people died in India during British imperialism. The East India Company is a company that is ruled by The British, but the people serving are Indians. In 1757 the East India Company troops won over India at the Battle of Plassey. From then they ruled India.
At the sea, Gandhi picked up a handful of salt. This act went against the British law mandating that they buy salt from their government and this law did not allow them to collect their own salt. That act was made to let the British government know that the Indian people were tired of being under Britain’s rule and they were tired of following all of the unjust laws that were
The 20th century, the most prominent examples of non-violence that induced a dramatic change in India in presence of vicious violence. One of the great souls Mahatma Gandhi’ who was born on October 2, 1869, in the Indian coastal city of Porbandar and sustained the most authentic life but was fully determined to give up his complete life for the good sake of India under British rule. From all of his experience getting married at young age, studying at London to thrown out of the train in South Africa just because of being colored and being arrested for getting uncontrolled over by the British he became to be known as a leader one by one to all the Indian community. His rules were always to fight against British but with nonviolence. What made
The British first came to India not only because of the abundance of raw materials, but also the mass potential they seen. The British East India Company, took advantage of the collapsing Mughal Empire, and broke away from their control to flourished their company. In 1857 the Sepoy army rebelled and that caused the British to come in guns blazing and take over the country. The British rule demolished India through, taxation on anything made in India, and the exportation of raw materials, which caused a plentiful amount of famine,and throughout all of this, the British kept most on India uneducated, and those they did educate, most were forced to become interpreters for the benefits it would make in taking over India and keeping the British in control. Political Paragraph British imperialism had a negative effect on the politics of India because of the corrupt justice system, and the utter lack of respect that killed masses of innocent people.
Even though, imperialism did benefit some countries economically, but it overshadows cultural traditions and the economy in others. ( Claim) After 1857, India was channeled as a market for British Industrial Products. This affected the Indian peasants who now had to grow cash crops, instead of their own food. This act destroyed the old village economy and worsened