Juliane Smith
Professor Mira Green
HSTAM 302
8 July 2023
The Legacy of the Gracchi Brothers The expansion of the Roman Republic had several impacts that would lead up to the agrarian reforms of the Gracchi Brothers, Tiberius, and Gaius Gracchus, which introduced, among benefits for the general population, violence as a means of political resolution. Their deaths at the hands of the Roman Republic would expose the issues in the political system while leaving a legacy of unique social reform. Driven by mos maiorum, Tiberius and Gaius Gracchus transformed the political system with agrarian reforms that ultimately led to the use of violence as a means of political revolution in the Roman Republic. To start, it is crucial to consider the legacy
…show more content…
The new acquisition of land benefitted the rich in the Roman Republic, who eventually drove out the poor with larger rent prices. In response, Tiberius, as tribune, proposed a land bill that distributed land to needy citizens, as well as limiting one person from holding more than 500 acres of land. As a result, the poor people of the Roman Republic were assisted and Tiberius gained more of a following due to his populist platform. Land bills like these, also, would increase the participation of the common people in Roman politics in response to the consequences of empire. To sum up, the agrarian reforms by Tiberius Gracchus as tribune transformed the political system by appealing to the common people who felt threatened by the powerful elite, though led to some political …show more content…
For example, a bill introduced by Tiberius was without consultation with the Senate, which “was not illegal, but it violated a custom of long standing.” Furthermore, upon receiving a veto by fellow tribune Marcus Octavius, Tiberius had him removed from office with his power, which was unconstitutional. Such actions on his behalf led the Senate to fear his growing alleged tyrant power which eventually led to a revolt in which Tiberius and many of his followers were killed. Similarly, Gaius Gracchus was killed along with his supporters by his political foes as a result of his agrarian reforms that were accumulating a massive public following. These events portray one of the biggest aspects of the Gracchi legacy, which was violence as a means of political resolution. This is because as a response to Tiberius’ unconstitutional methods and Gaius’ unique reforms, the Senate sought it better to have them killed instead, as well as a few citizens, leading to the bloodshed that became the Gracchi
As stated in the article in Gaius Gracchus, “However questionable their political tactics at times were, the brothers Gracchus were to show up a fundamental flaw in the way Roman society was conducting itself. Running an army with less and less conscripts to oversee an expanding empire was not sustainable” (Gaius Gracchus Article). Both Tiberius and Gaius tried to help elevate the poor people of Rome and expand their army without also increasing Roman land and population. Rome had clear flaws in leadership, but the flaws that eventually brought about its fall were the issues Gaius and Tiberius tried to address. It is impossible to control an ever increasing population with a small army that never gets much bigger because of the strict laws around conscription.
He wanted revenge for is brother after he was illegally murdered. Bradley states that “…according to the aims [Gaius] wished to achieve (to avenge Tiberius’ death, to alleviate unemployment and to weaken the senate)” (1990). Undoubtedly, he wished to undermine the senate after what they did because the should have been persecuted, but were not. Furthermore, Bradley suggests that Gaius’ motives for his reforms were to relive the suffering of the urban unemployed and poor people, as well as to further the agriculture law that Tiberius re-enacted (1990, p.251-255). By doing this, he is helping the plebeians by letting them have more opportunities, but especially to make Rome fairer.
Tiberius built on this trust with the plebs, and told them he could get their land back, and that he wanted to help. This is prompted him to become tribune. After achieving this status, he chose to identify one of Rome's biggest problems, the distribution of land. He claimed that the upper class had too much and the lower class had too little. Therefore he proposed a new law to be passed.
Tiberius Gracchus tried to help the common Roman people through his actions as a tribune in 133 B.C. by a familiar method, Agrarian reform. His proposals were met with out right rejections from the senate, but he ended up passing the law anyway. This action along with his announcing his illegal re-election bid for tribune according to Morey caused the senators to call-out “Tiberius as a traitor” ,but “the people extolled him as a patriot”. (1901) When election day came Tiberius Gracchus was murdered in the senate along with three-hundred of his followers by a group of senators led by Scipio Nasica.
Furthermore, when the author describes how Tiberius handled his plans, he states, “interempto senatu”, making Tiberius appear to have negative intentions for the senate. In his “doing away with” the senate, Tiberius is depicted to be discarding a traditional Roman value. In this way, the author chooses specific words to make Tiberius appear to be someone who cared about power for himself, but had no regards for the republic- and was thusly
Tiberius and Gaius Gracchus, better known as the ‘Gracchi Brothers’ were a pair of tribunes descending from the plebs from the 2nd century BCE who sought to introduce land reforms and other legislations that aligned with their populist views/ideas. It can be said that the career of the two brothers was marked by murder, riots and outright manipulation of the power they were granted which completely altered the state of Roman politics- aiding in the breakdown of the Roman Republic. The legislation they sought to pass essentially redistributed major aristocratic land ownership among the commoners such as the urban poor and veterans. After achieving little success during the early stages of the reforms, both were assassinated by enemy parties.
Over 4700 Roman citizens were executed and their properties were confiscated and sold by auction offering great fortunes to his followers. He also transferred all the legislative power to the Senate and removed the laws of the Gracchi. All of these harsh actions done in order to go against the democratic political views of Marius were very unjustified and
In the greatness of ancient Rome, an evil act took place that destroyed the balance of power and changed the course of history. Even though some have praised Julius Caesar's assassination as a courageous attempt to protect the Republic, it is clear that it was a planned murderous act that called for legal consequences. Senators became irritated with Julius Caesar as he made changes and grew in power. On March 44 BCE, a group of conspirators assassinated Caesar within the Senate walls. The assassination of Julius Caesar was a determined act of violence that should be punished under the law, despite political motives and noble intentions.
Considering Caesar’s approval surrounded by the senate, it gave him a copious number of enemies because other politicians were jealous of the number of things that he had accomplished in the republic. He also gave former enemies, ones he had previously conquered, positions in government. Some of these positions included the senate. This was ultimately the biggest mistake during his reign due to the fact that, these people conducted the assassination plot for
The two centuries antecedent to the Common Era were tumultuous in the world of Rome. The political realm in particular was undergoing drastic changes in the way the government ran and in the way men claimed power. In a way, the whole series of events started with the brothers Gracchi. The two brothers proposed different bills designed to help the lower classes; “Tiberius Gracchus proposed an agrarian law… Gaius Gracchus proposed a grain law.” (Cicero, Speech in Defense of Sestius, 48.103).
They abused an oath known as sacrosanctitas, or the right of tribunes to not be physically harmed, to take control of Rome. With this oath in place, Tiberius bypassed the Senate and instead used the Plebian Assembly to issue land and farms to those without them. Both brothers ignored the tradition of tribunes being only elected once by announcing they will run for the next election, resulting in Tiberius being killed by angry senators. When Gaius tried to instate new courts to put senators on trial for political corruption, the senators advised the consuls to defend the republic by killing him. This ultimately resulted in two factions being created, the “supporters of the people” in the populares faction, or supporters of the “best” whom belonged to the optimates
The Senate realized Caesar was going to be king for a long period, thus destroying the power of the Senate. The Senators intention was killing for the good, the integrity, and the survival of the Republic. They alleged that his power would end their representative government. By doing that, though, they brought on rule by strong emperors, which ended the power of the Roman Senate. This is shown by how the killers claimed the murder was the murder of a tyrant.
The Gracchi brothers, Tiberius and Gaius, had intentions of making Rome the best it could be, which contradicted the visions of the Senators. The two brothers grew up during a tough time in the Roman Empire, but they took it upon themselves to make a difference. “The Empire went through tremendous growth, through both acquisition of land, slaves, and various citizen classes.” This drastic growth ultimately led to a fall in the Roman political system. Tiberius, the older brother, founded the idea of the agrarian laws, which was later continued by his younger brother, Gaius, after his death.
Augustus had made many important reforms in his rule, by having to control everything in Rome and making the senators work for him to build and do the thing for him. The senates were an advisory body whose advice becomes law via the consuls, praetors, and by confirmation by the assemblies of the citizens in Rome. Augustus had mad the laws so strongly that if women or a man do anything behind his back, he willpower send them to a different region, and get them killed by putting them with the animals to die. When Augustus made the laws across he directly made his plans to the people to present his Tribunician
“If you must break the law, do it to seize power: in all other cases observe it”- Julius Caesar, the man who is known as one of the most fascinating political figures of all time. The one who through his military genius, expanded the Roman Republic to include parts of what are now Spain, France, Germany, Switzerland, and Belgium. Although the hero had many followers and admirers, he was ultimately stabbed to death by his own fellow politicians. Caesar was born in July, 100 B.C.E to Gaius Caesar and Aurelia. The family claimed a noble history but hadn’t produced many influential people till then.